From: Michael A. Terrell on
"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
>
> I think someone (at least one) misunderstood. I don't think they were
> criticizing you, rather elaborating or even having some fun. At least it
> started out that way. ...or maybe *I* missed it. ;-)
>
> In any case, the Usenet is a wild place. If you can't take the criticism, get
> out of the kitchen. ;-)


Some people are born with no sense of humor. Others had it
surgically removed. :(


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

http://www.flickr.com/photos/materrell/
From: krw on
On Wed, 05 May 2010 18:59:36 -0700, Hatunen <hatunen(a)cox.net> wrote:

>On Wed, 05 May 2010 20:46:53 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 05 May 2010 18:39:30 -0700, Hatunen <hatunen(a)cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 05 May 2010 20:18:51 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
>>><mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Adam Funk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2010-05-02, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > What do you expect in drivel crossposted from news:alt.usage.english
>>>>> > other than small minds that try to make you think they are intelligent?
>>>>> > It would be a good place for 'Sloman' and 'D from B C' to hang out.
>>>>> > Neither of them seem to know electronics, yet they use a lot of words to
>>>>> > say nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you read, my lord?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Whatever strikes my fancy. I have a couple thousand books in my home
>>>>library. I have history books. I have some of the classics. Sci-Fi
>>>>novels, including a few that I wrote. I have Electrical & Mechanical
>>>>engineering texts. I have military history books. I collect old
>>>>hymnals, and early EE textbooks. Then there are hundreds of component
>>>>databooks. Biographies of famous people and companies.
>>>
>>>But apparently not Shakespeare...
>>
>>You must mean http://www.shakespeare-fishing.com/
>
>Those damn woosh birds are everywhere...

Even in your mirror, evidently. You really should get out more.
From: Mark Edwards on
No cluons were harmed when Hatunen wrote:
>As originally designed, a score of 500 on a test section was the
>average, while each 100 above or below represented a standard
>deviation.

While it may be true, I see no reason to call oTTo a deviant. Sheesh!


Mark Edwards
--
Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request

From: Hatunen on
On Wed, 05 May 2010 23:35:30 -0500, Mark Edwards
<Mark-Edwards(a)comcast.net> wrote:

>No cluons were harmed when Hatunen wrote:
>>As originally designed, a score of 500 on a test section was the
>>average, while each 100 above or below represented a standard
>>deviation.
>
>While it may be true, I see no reason to call oTTo a deviant. Sheesh!

Deviate.

--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
From: Bryce Utting on
Mark Edwards <Mark-Edwards(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> No cluons were harmed when Hatunen wrote:
>>As originally designed, a score of 500 on a test section was the
>>average, while each 100 above or below represented a standard
>>deviation.
>
> While it may be true, I see no reason to call oTTo a deviant. Sheesh!

damn straight! let's see some adjectives in there. otherwise you're
just calling him a *plain* deviant, and them's fightin' words.


butting

--
http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~butting
[Pedestrians, noun:] people who have found somewhere to park the car.
-- Guy Chapman