From: Geoff on 20 Jan 2007 19:29 Snappy wrote: > Good point, I'll give that a try too. I tried to get the signal out of > the guitar as clean as possible: there are a zillion gadgets available > if it comes to alter the tone after the guitar itself, but I wanted to > start off with a pure tone. That's the whole purpose of this exercise. > Have a listen to this (without the pot. meter though): > > http://home.tiscali.nl/prolingua/ > > Ciao, Arie What's the whole purpose ? To start off with a clean tone, or to use the zillion gadgets to alter the tone ? The samples sound like an ultra pure guitar pickup sound. Pretty much exactly like an unmodified guitar thru a DI box, and certainly no 'better' for all your inconvenience and complications. The bland characterless sound the pretty much the whole world tries to avoid in an electric guitar. geoff
From: Phildo on 20 Jan 2007 05:08 "Snappy" <snappy(a)tiscali.nl> wrote in message news:45B1C2BB.1090109(a)tiscali.nl... > Geoff schreef: >> It all seems incredibly misguided. What makes your requirements so >> stringent that what is good enough (if not actually necessary) for >> everybody else, is not good enough for you ? > > That's all nonsense Geoff: give these samples a listen if you will and > judge from what you hear. I'm certainly not like everybody else and I hope > you are neither since that would mean I (and the rest of mankind) were > like you ... > > http://home.tiscali.nl/prolingua/ Don't worry about Geoff. He made a complete idiot of himself on here last week and is in the middle of a tantrum as a result. Once his mummy changes his nappy he'll hopefully end this hissy fit. Until he gets over it and grows up a bit just ignore him. Phildo
From: Hamm Guitars on 20 Jan 2007 23:04 > ** Not true. A single gang, low value pot wired across the transformer's > output is the best way - assuming there is no grounded centre tap. Yup, you are absoutely correct. Using a dual pot to ground could potentially short out the mic preamp and the phantom power on the board. Never put that much thought into it as it made more sense to attenuate the unbalanced side. "Phil Allison" <philallison(a)tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:51fnciF1jjmjjU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > "Hamm Guitars" >> >> I see what you are after. You are a "straight wire with gain" kind of >> guy. >> >> Padding on either side of the DI shouldn't make that much of a >> difference, at least not one that I could hear, and putting the pad on >> the unbalanced side is pretty much exactly like putting the volume >> control back on the guitar - although it is allot easier than trying to >> put a variable pad on the balanced side, which would require a precision >> dual pot. > > > ** Not true. A single gang, low value pot wired across the transformer's > output is the best way - assuming there is no grounded centre tap. > > But in general, the BEST way to feed an electric guitar into a balanced > mic input is to use an * ACTIVE * DI unit with FET input. > > The jack lead from the guitar to the DI unit may be kept very short if the > DI is worn ( ie on a belt) by the player. > > The OP's issues with pots on his guitar affecting tone etc are the RESULT > of his using a transformer instead of an active DI. > > > > ....... Phil > > > > >
From: Tim Padrick on 25 Jan 2007 12:01
"Snappy" <snappy(a)tiscali.nl> wrote in message news:45B06ED3.2030302(a)tiscali.nl... > Geoff schreef: >> asdf wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> forgive me if this has been asked before: >>> >>> is it possible to place a vol. pot meter in a low impedance (1K, >>> microphone level), balanced line. It should be a stereo pot.meter in >>> order to be able to attenuate both lines simultaneously, but I'm >>> puzzled about its value. >>> Any ideas? Thanks a lot, >> >> Not something that would normally be done. What is your purpose, and >> what is the mic working into ? >> >> geoff > > Thanks so far, it would have been wiser to explain what is the reason for > asking. > > I built a mini DI-box into an electric guitar to change unbalanced into > balanced and to reduce the impedance significantly. Works like a charm, > very fine sound and I'm able to go directly into a mic.preamp. Just > advantages so far. But now I miss the possibility to alter the volume on > the guitar, hence my question: how to put a vol.pot meter into a bal.-low > impedance line. > Thanks again, > > Arie I expect that the DI you built has a much more detrimental effect on the sound of the guitar than do the pot and guitar cord you eleiminated, owing to the comparatively low input impedance of the DI. Put the guitar back to stock, and run it into a Radial J48 or Pro48 active DI. |