From: JD on
GT wrote:
> "JD" <JD(a)No-where.con> wrote in message
> news:88di3fFeltU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>> What is the simplest software that would get them talking to one another?
>>
>> It seems that there are numerous ways to do this but lots of petty details
>> to work on.
>>
>> Let's assume Windows OSs.
>
> A short version of Paul's answer - if you are connecting the PCs together
> *directly* (not via a network), then a normal LAN cable (sometimes called
> patch) won't work - you need a 'crossover cable'.

Thank you GT. You have brought back memories.
About 20 years ago I actually
modified a parallel cable to a crossover. As I
recall there was only one wire to
be adjusted. I am the kind of guy who loathes
throwing away things he has made,
so I will go through my boxes to check if I still
have it or gave it away to someone.

Back soon :-)
From: JD on
Grinder wrote:
> On 6/23/2010 3:48 AM, GT wrote:
>> "JD"<JD(a)No-where.con> wrote in message
>> news:88di3fFeltU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>> What is the simplest software that would get them talking to one
>>> another?
>>>
>>> It seems that there are numerous ways to do this but lots of petty
>>> details
>>> to work on.
>>>
>>> Let's assume Windows OSs.
>>
>> A short version of Paul's answer - if you are connecting the PCs together
>> *directly* (not via a network), then a normal LAN cable (sometimes called
>> patch) won't work - you need a 'crossover cable'.
>
> Just an extra 2 cents here:
>
> I would recommend using a regular cable + crossover adapter instead of a
> crossover cable. For one off situations I guess it doesn't matter much,
> but I find that the adapters simplify options in the long run.
>
> http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/tools/7470/
>
> http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?p_id=5088

Thank you Grinder for the suggestion.

Now you, and earlier Paul about IDE to ATA, have
jogged my memory about these adapters. I will do a
few searches and, if nothing turns up, I contact a
small local computer store - the only one in the
area.

Thanks again to all :-)
From: GT on
"JD" <JD(a)No-where.con> wrote in message
news:88f1reF84nU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> GT wrote:
>> "JD" <JD(a)No-where.con> wrote in message
>> news:88di3fFeltU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>> What is the simplest software that would get them talking to one
>>> another?
>>>
>>> It seems that there are numerous ways to do this but lots of petty
>>> details to work on.
>>>
>>> Let's assume Windows OSs.
>>
>> A short version of Paul's answer - if you are connecting the PCs together
>> *directly* (not via a network), then a normal LAN cable (sometimes called
>> patch) won't work - you need a 'crossover cable'.
>
> Thank you GT. You have brought back memories. About 20 years ago I
> actually
> modified a parallel cable to a crossover. As I recall there was only one
> wire to
> be adjusted. I am the kind of guy who loathes throwing away things he has
> made,
> so I will go through my boxes to check if I still have it or gave it away
> to someone.
>
> Back soon :-)

Same with a network cable - there are only about 7 wires in there, so you
just need to swap a few round, but you really need a crimping tool to put
the connector back on.


From: JD on
GT wrote:
> "JD" <JD(a)No-where.con> wrote in message
> news:88f1reF84nU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>> GT wrote:
>>> "JD" <JD(a)No-where.con> wrote in message
>>> news:88di3fFeltU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>>> What is the simplest software that would get them talking to one
>>>> another?
>>>>
>>>> It seems that there are numerous ways to do this but lots of petty
>>>> details to work on.
>>>>
>>>> Let's assume Windows OSs.
>>> A short version of Paul's answer - if you are connecting the PCs together
>>> *directly* (not via a network), then a normal LAN cable (sometimes called
>>> patch) won't work - you need a 'crossover cable'.
>> Thank you GT. You have brought back memories. About 20 years ago I
>> actually
>> modified a parallel cable to a crossover. As I recall there was only one
>> wire to
>> be adjusted. I am the kind of guy who loathes throwing away things he has
>> made,
>> so I will go through my boxes to check if I still have it or gave it away
>> to someone.
>>
>> Back soon :-)
>
> Same with a network cable - there are only about 7 wires in there, so you
> just need to swap a few round, but you really need a crimping tool to put
> the connector back on.


Thanks again GT.

I found a USB cable with the usual rectangular
plug on each end. In the middle
is a lump with USB Network Cable written on it. I
assume some crossover happens there.
I have this cable connected to the computer and
Netbook and I am having the same zero success as I
had when both boxes were on the network and both
could see the Internet.
Either that USB cable is defective or the software
is killing me.
From: GMAN on
In article <88f9c8FkcoU1(a)mid.individual.net>, JD <JD(a)No-where.con> wrote:
>GT wrote:
>> "JD" <JD(a)No-where.con> wrote in message
>> news:88f1reF84nU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>> GT wrote:
>>>> "JD" <JD(a)No-where.con> wrote in message
>>>> news:88di3fFeltU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>>>> What is the simplest software that would get them talking to one
>>>>> another?
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems that there are numerous ways to do this but lots of petty
>>>>> details to work on.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's assume Windows OSs.
>>>> A short version of Paul's answer - if you are connecting the PCs together
>>>> *directly* (not via a network), then a normal LAN cable (sometimes called
>>>> patch) won't work - you need a 'crossover cable'.
>>> Thank you GT. You have brought back memories. About 20 years ago I
>>> actually
>>> modified a parallel cable to a crossover. As I recall there was only one
>>> wire to
>>> be adjusted. I am the kind of guy who loathes throwing away things he has
>>> made,
>>> so I will go through my boxes to check if I still have it or gave it away
>>> to someone.
>>>
>>> Back soon :-)
>>
>> Same with a network cable - there are only about 7 wires in there, so you
>> just need to swap a few round, but you really need a crimping tool to put
>> the connector back on.
>
>
>Thanks again GT.
>
>I found a USB cable with the usual rectangular
>plug on each end. In the middle
>is a lump with USB Network Cable written on it. I
>assume some crossover happens there.
>I have this cable connected to the computer and
>Netbook and I am having the same zero success as I
>had when both boxes were on the network and both
>could see the Internet.
>Either that USB cable is defective or the software
>is killing me.
You have to give your network a name