911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: BradGuth on 17 Sep 2009 13:56 On Aug 20, 2:47 pm, "Kirby M. Wilson" <kir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > n Aug 20, 1:07 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > >http://www.voltairnet.org/article16636.html > >http://algxy.com/psych/9-11sceario.htmlhttp://libertycalling.com/cmom... > > If only George Bush Jr. and his Jewish Illuminati conspirators would > stop their terrorist activities > > http://www.911myths.com/http://www.debunking911.com/links.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attackshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debunking_9/11_Mythshttp://www.answers.com/topic/debunking-9-11-mythshttp://www.debunk911myths.org/http://www.slate.com/id/2088092/http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Myths-Conspiracy-Theories/dp/15881...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theorieshttp://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=fahrenheit-2777http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2006/04/...http://www.2spare.com/item_43133.aspxhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theoryhttp://www.carpenoctem.tv/cons/ Wishful thinking, and otherwise there's no fat chance of those Zionist Nazis giving up without a darn good fight to the deaths of most everyone. I'm beginning to think they've killed off our newsgroup contributor Warhol, because it has been 6 days and counting since his last topic/ reply. They'll obviously stop at noting, including the putting of Christ on a stick if need be, and we know as a matter of public record that they never police their own kind. ~ BG
From: Michael Moroney on 17 Sep 2009 13:58 knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com writes: >Particles of Metal in the Dust: The Deutsche Bank building, which was >right next to the Twin Towers, was heavily contaminated by dust >produced by their destruction. But Deutsche Bank's insurance company >refused to pay for the clean-up, claiming that this dust had not >resulted from the destruction of the WTC. So Deutsche Bank hired the >RJ Lee Group to do a study, which showed that the dust in the Deutsche >Bank was WTC dust, which had a unique signature. Part of this >signature was Spherical iron . . . particles. Microscopic iron particles aren't evidence of thermite. Large blobs of molten iron, maybe, but not microscopic particles. > The study even showed >that, whereas iron particles constitute only 0.04 percent of normal >building dust, they constituted almost 6 percent of WTC Dust -- meaning >almost 150 times as much as normal. [22] 6% of the huge amount of dust created? Do the math, do you really believe they somehow smuggled in enough superdupernanothermate to add 6% to the mass of the resulting dust? (even if superdupernanothermate really did produce microscopic iron, which is a fantasy)
From: knews4u2chew on 17 Sep 2009 22:53 On Sep 17, 10:56 am, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 20, 2:47 pm, "Kirby M. Wilson" <kir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > n Aug 20, 1:07 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > > >http://www.voltairnet.org/article16636.html > > >http://algxy.com/psych/9-11sceario.htmlhttp://libertycalling.com/cmom.... > > > If only George Bush Jr. and his Jewish Illuminati conspirators would > > stop their terrorist activities > > >http://www.911myths.com/http://www.debunking911.com/links.htmhttp://e... > > Wishful thinking, and otherwise there's no fat chance of those Zionist > Nazis giving up without a darn good fight to the deaths of most > everyone. > > I'm beginning to think they've killed off our newsgroup contributor > Warhol, because it has been 6 days and counting since his last topic/ > reply. They'll obviously stop at noting, including the putting of > Christ on a stick if need be, and we know as a matter of public record > that they never police their own kind. > > ~ BG Well at least one newspaper in Santa Barbara isn't Zionist controlled.....yet. http://www.independent.com/news/2009/sep/17/twin-towers-twin-myths/
From: Dave Johnson on 18 Sep 2009 06:31 On Sep 17, 10:53 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > On Sep 17, 10:56 am, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 20, 2:47 pm, "Kirby M. Wilson" <kir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > If only George Bush Jr. and his Jewish Illuminati conspirators would > > > stop their terrorist activities > > > > > ~ BG > >t Zionist > controlled..... you're a loony http://www.911myths.com/ http://www.debunking911.com/links.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debunking_9/11_Myths http://www.answers.com/topic/debunking-9-11-myths http://www.debunk911myths.org/
From: AllYou! on 18 Sep 2009 09:43
In news:7e9a13e2-872a-4bf2-a1ea-84a85db32c0c(a)z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused: > On Sep 17, 8:44 am, "P. Maffia" <pmaf...(a)centurytel.net> wrote: >> The mere fact hat he and his fellow whack jobs have had to >> concoct so many explanations to fit their moronic scenarios >> should be enough for even a boob like "Knews" to realize how >> preposterous their beliefs are. >> > Meaningless smear. For someone who constantly calls everyone who disagrees with him a liar, you're getting off pretty easy. >> Even his latest, that the building was pre-prepared for >> demolition when it was built defies any sense of logic. Any >> explosive material installed and left unattended for as long as >> they would have would have seen some natural deterioration so >> that, at least, some major portion of that material would >> become unstable enough that it would be impossible to predict >> just how they would effect the demolition when they were >> finally triggered. > > Proof? Common sense combined with the slightest knowledge of explosives. You have demonstrated that you have neither. >> That would be even more true in the case of a mini-nuke, which >> did not exist at the time the buildings were constructed. >> > And your assumption that it had to be built in is meaningless. > >> But when someone begins with a conclusion, as does "knews," and >> tries to concoct an explanation to support that conclusion one >> has to expect preposterous stories that continually change. >> > > You mean like "office fires" which NEVER in history cause a steel > framed building to collapse, caused three buildings to collapse > in one day? No, they caused two buildings to collapse in one day. But if fires could not possibly cause steel buildings to collapse, then why does virtually every building code in the US, and maybe even the world, require structural steel beams and columns to be wrapped with fire retardant insulation? > The NIST report is a FRAUD that ignores evidence and standard > crime scene investigation protocal. Proof? > You can name call and smear all you want but the evidence will > never go away. On that, we agree. |