911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: The Terminator on 19 Sep 2009 19:23 On Sep 19, 12:55 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > On Sep 19, 10:42 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > > > > > Innews:13d51727-f96e-48bb-a869-85726190495f(a)i18g2000pro.googlegroups.com, > > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > > > Listen to the desigued. > > > Don't you realize that you continue to prove that your claims have > > no credibility every time you respond with nonsense like you have > > above? > > > And if fire can't cause buildings to fail, then why is it that all > > major building codes in the world require all structural steel > > elements to be covered with fireproof insulation? > > Read, learn, discern. I don't know if you're the nuttiest person on the internet knews but thanks for the wacky conspiracy entertainment !
From: knews4u2chew on 19 Sep 2009 19:51 On Sep 19, 4:23 pm, The Terminator <kir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Sep 19, 12:55 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > > > > On Sep 19, 10:42 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > > > > Innews:13d51727-f96e-48bb-a869-85726190495f(a)i18g2000pro.googlegroups.com, > > > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > > > > Listen to the desigued. > > > > Don't you realize that you continue to prove that your claims have > > > no credibility every time you respond with nonsense like you have > > > above? > > > > And if fire can't cause buildings to fail, then why is it that all > > > major building codes in the world require all structural steel > > > elements to be covered with fireproof insulation? > > > Read, learn, discern. > > I don't know if you're the nuttiest person on the internet knews but > thanks for the wacky conspiracy entertainment ! Smears, name calling, and snippage lose. Read, learn, discern. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm
From: Iarnrod on 19 Sep 2009 20:24 On Sep 18, 10:44 pm, Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...(a)live.com> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:27:09 -0700,Iarnrod<iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Sorry, KKKook, but everything I claim is proven true. What you say is > > proven false. That's just the way it is. > > It is precisely that attitude and response that submarines any argument > you might make. How so? When someone says something that's been proven right, and points that out, you somehow think that undermines the truth of it? That begs for an explanation, and make it a good one!
From: Iarnrod on 19 Sep 2009 20:27 On Sep 19, 11:09 am, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > On Sep 19, 9:27 am, Daniel <sabot12...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 18, 12:40 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > > > On Sep 18, 3:31 am, Dave Johnson <nospam...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 17, 10:53 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > > > > > On Sep 17, 10:56 am, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 20, 2:47 pm, "Kirby M. Wilson" <kir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > If only George Bush Jr. and his Jewish Illuminati conspirators would > > > > > > > stop their terrorist activities > > > > > > > ~ BG > > > > > >t Zionist > > > > > controlled..... > > > > > you're a loony > > > > >http://www.911truth.com/ > > > >http://www.bunking911.com/links.htmhttp://en.ciawikipedia.org/wiki/Se....... > > > > And you are a blind fool to believe the government's fairy tail. > > > NO BUILDING IN HISTORY ever collapsed from fire. > > > The WTC buildings were built to withstand MULTIPLE jet hits. > > > Cite? And please use a credible one, and include the design specs. > > Listen to the designer.http://www.metacafe.com/watch/338148/wtc_designer_speaks/ > But then he's not credible is he? How does the fact that he was proven wrong by events support you? Turns out he was horribly wrong. By the way, the 707 was a lighter airplane than the modern 757 and 767, and the design took into account a low-fuel instrument approach to LGA going off course at low approach speed hitting the building, not fully-laden and fueled heavier jetliners slamming in at 500+ mph. BIG difference.
From: AllYou! on 19 Sep 2009 23:34
In news:e818a3d2-932f-488a-a341-5c0974e00ac1(a)o9g2000prg.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused: > On Sep 19, 10:42 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> Innews:13d51727-f96e-48bb-a869-85726190495f(a)i18g2000pro.googlegroups.com, >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> >>> Listen to the designer. >>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/338148/wtc_designer_speaks/ >>> But then he's not credible is he? >> >> The WTC didn't fall from the 'hit' (i.e., impact) from the >> planes, which is what the designer is talking about. The WTC >> fell due to the effects of the fire which then ensued. >> >> Don't you realize that you continue to prove that your claims >> have no credibility every time you respond with nonsense like >> you have above? >> >> And if fire can't cause buildings to fail, then why is it that >> all major building codes in the world require all structural >> steel elements to be covered with fireproof insulation? > > Read, learn, discern. > http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm As usual, your posted links don't even come close to answering the question asked. |