911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: AllYou! on 21 Sep 2009 11:34 In news:c913816d-d4a2-4917-aeb2-2db21dca9e15(a)z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> By the way, the 707 was a lighter airplane than the modern 757 >> and 767, and the design took into account a low-fuel instrument >> approach to LGA going off course at low approach speed hitting >> the building, not fully-laden and fueled heavier jetliners >> slamming in at 500+ mph. BIG difference. > > Doesn't matter. > "Multiple jet hits." Right. "HITS" The WTC towers didn't fall due to the HITS. They fell due to the fires from which structural steel is supposed to be insulated.
From: AllYou! on 21 Sep 2009 11:36 In news:8b5a1301-cad7-4b17-a3ee-52095febed12(a)m3g2000pri.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused: > Buildings don't collapse from "office fires." Then why is the structural steel in office buildings supposed to be fire insulated?
From: knews4u2chew on 21 Sep 2009 14:10 On Sep 21, 8:39 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > In article <psKdnZYItuyXACrXnZ2dnUVZ_oWdn...(a)posted.choiceonecommunications>, > > > > AllYou! <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > >In > >news:c913816d-d4a2-4917-aeb2-2db21dca9e15(a)z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com, > >knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >>> By the way, the 707 was a lighter airplane than the modern 757 > >>> and 767, and the design took into account a low-fuel instrument > >>> approach to LGA going off course at low approach speed hitting > >>> the building, not fully-laden and fueled heavier jetliners > >>> slamming in at 500+ mph. BIG difference. > > >> Doesn't matter. > >> "Multiple jet hits." > > >Right. "HITS" The WTC towers didn't fall due to the HITS. They > >fell due to the fires from which structural steel is supposed to be > >insulated. > > In "Report From Ground Zero" (pgs 310-311), FDNY structures expert > Vincent Dunn describes how the WTC towers had effectively no > fireproofing when compared to the older steel buildings, built to > standards that required 2 inches of brick and masonry on all > structural steel. Dunn also says that the WTC towers were unique in > the minimal fireproofing. > > Source:http://snurl.com/j54ud [Page 310, Report From Ground Zero] > > Who is Vincent Dunn? > http://unjobs.org/authors/vincent-dunn > And for whom does he make the most money for "consulting?"
From: Al Dykes on 21 Sep 2009 14:16 In article <ca141024-af33-42ac-8b10-763aa0791085(a)m3g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Sep 21, 8:39=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> In article <psKdnZYItuyXACrXnZ2dnUVZ_oWdn...(a)posted.choiceonecommunicatio= >ns>, >> >> >> >> AllYou! <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> >In >> >news:c913816d-d4a2-4917-aeb2-2db21dca9e15(a)z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com, >> >knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> >> >>> By the way, the 707 was a lighter airplane than the modern 757 >> >>> and 767, and the design took into account a low-fuel instrument >> >>> approach to LGA going off course at low approach speed hitting >> >>> the building, not fully-laden and fueled heavier jetliners >> >>> slamming in at 500+ mph. BIG difference. >> >> >> Doesn't matter. >> >> "Multiple jet hits." >> >> >Right. =A0"HITS" =A0The WTC towers didn't fall due to the HITS. =A0They >> >fell due to the fires from which structural steel is supposed to be >> >insulated. >> >> =A0 In "Report From Ground Zero" (pgs 310-311), FDNY structures expert >> =A0 Vincent Dunn describes how the WTC towers had effectively no >> =A0 fireproofing when compared to the older steel buildings, built to >> =A0 standards that required 2 inches of brick and masonry on all >> =A0 structural steel. =A0Dunn also says that the WTC towers were unique i= >n >> =A0 the minimal fireproofing. >> >> =A0 =A0 Source:http://snurl.com/j54ud=A0[Page 310, Report From Ground Zer= >o] >> >> =A0 Who is Vincent Dunn? >> =A0http://unjobs.org/authors/vincent-dunn >> >And for whom does he make the most money for "consulting?" > Ad hominem much? -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
From: knews4u2chew on 21 Sep 2009 14:35
On Sep 21, 11:16 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > In article <ca141024-af33-42ac-8b10-763aa0791...(a)m3g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, > > > > <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >On Sep 21, 8:39=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > >> In article <psKdnZYItuyXACrXnZ2dnUVZ_oWdn...(a)posted.choiceonecommunicatio= > >ns>, > > >> AllYou! <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > >> >In > >> >news:c913816d-d4a2-4917-aeb2-2db21dca9e15(a)z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com, > >> >knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >> >>> By the way, the 707 was a lighter airplane than the modern 757 > >> >>> and 767, and the design took into account a low-fuel instrument > >> >>> approach to LGA going off course at low approach speed hitting > >> >>> the building, not fully-laden and fueled heavier jetliners > >> >>> slamming in at 500+ mph. BIG difference. > > >> >> Doesn't matter. > >> >> "Multiple jet hits." > > >> >Right. =A0"HITS" =A0The WTC towers didn't fall due to the HITS. =A0They > >> >fell due to the fires from which structural steel is supposed to be > >> >insulated. > > >> =A0 In "Report From Ground Zero" (pgs 310-311), FDNY structures expert > >> =A0 Vincent Dunn describes how the WTC towers had effectively no > >> =A0 fireproofing when compared to the older steel buildings, built to > >> =A0 standards that required 2 inches of brick and masonry on all > >> =A0 structural steel. =A0Dunn also says that the WTC towers were unique i= > >n > >> =A0 the minimal fireproofing. > > >> =A0 =A0 Source:http://snurl.com/j54ud=A0[Page 310, Report From Ground Zer= > >o] > > >> =A0 Who is Vincent Dunn? > >> =A0http://unjobs.org/authors/vincent-dunn > > >And for whom does he make the most money for "consulting?" > > Ad hominem much? > > -- > Al Dykes > News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. > - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail You don't think it's a fair question? You don't think the government is hiring ANYONE but their old buddy "contractors" to review their "dirty" work? Where's an "independent" investigation? All most "truthers" want is just that. Besides the traitor's head that is. http://journalof911studies.com/ www.ae911truth.org |