Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: DanB on 1 Oct 2009 02:51 Iarnrod wrote: > On Sep 30, 5:49 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: >> A controlled demolition could have bee performed in many manners not >> seen as "standard" demolitions. > > No it could not have. Not sure what bees have to do with this but you need a comma after 'No'.
From: Iarnrod on 1 Oct 2009 09:50 On Oct 1, 12:51 am, DanB <a...(a)some.net> wrote: > Iarnrod wrote: > > On Sep 30, 5:49 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > >> A controlled demolition could have bee performed in many manners not > >> seen as "standard" demolitions. > > > No it could not have. > > Not sure what bees have to do with this but you need a comma after 'No'. No I don't.
From: Henry on 1 Oct 2009 09:59 AllYou! wrote: > In news:h9dqiq$qm1$2(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >> AllYou! wrote: >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>>> They are exploding and disintegrating. >>> By your own standard, you're proving that you're a whacko. >> So says the deluded nut job who has obviously never >> even watched a video of the demolitions. Only on usenut. >> The towers quite literally exploded and disintegrated in >> a matter of seconds. Why do you refuse to read, think, view >> the evidence or study the expert research? Mindlessly parroting >> government lies and propagandas makes you look extremely >> foolish and gullible. >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjfoXbyffso&feature=related > Q. E. D. In your state of delusion, do those three letters "explain" why you "think" that a building that is quite clearly and beyond any doubt exploding and disintegrating with such incredible force that it's ejecting huge steel columns laterally for hundreds of feet in all directions... http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/expulsion.html and pulverizing thousands of tons of concrete into fine dust... http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/concrete.html ....is actually just sagging due to gradual softening of a few steel columns? -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Henry on 1 Oct 2009 10:00 AllYou! wrote: > In news:h9b2cn$qjt$3(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >> Daniel wrote: >> >>> There is not ONE BIT of evidence of explosives being used >> >> >> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/oralhistories/explosions.html >> >> Quotes from witnesses to the demolition: >> >> It was a frigging noise. At first I thought it was -- do you >> ever see professional demolition where they set the charges on >> certain floors and then you hear "Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop"? >> That's exactly what -- because I thought it was that. When I >> heard that frigging noise, that's when I saw the building coming >> down. >> Oh, when we came out of the building and we were walking across >> West Street when we first got out of the building, we're walking >> across the street and all you heard was like bombs going off >> above your head. You couldn't see it. It was just cloudy. And we >> found out later it was the military jets. That was an eerie >> sound. You couldn't see it and all you heard was like a "boom" >> and it just kept going. We couldn't see 50 feet above our head >> because of the dust. So we didn't know if it was bombs going off >> or whatever, but we didn't want to stay there. >> >> >> >> We were there I don't know, maybe 10, 15 minutes and then I just >> remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on >> television they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was >> going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions. >> >> It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane >> hit, because we originally had thought there was like an >> internal detonation explosives because it went in succession, >> boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down. With that >> everybody was just stunned for a second or two, looking at the >> tower coming down. >> >> And while I was still in that immediate area, the south tower, 2 >> World Trade Center, there was what appeared to be at first an >> explosion. It appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all >> four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there >> seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the >> beginning of the collapse. >> >> Somewhere around the middle of the World Trade Center, there >> was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just >> one flash. Then this flash just kept popping all the way around >> the building and that building had started to explode. The >> popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an >> orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it >> would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I >> could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting >> bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building. >> >> >> >> I was watching the fire, watching the people jump and hearing a >> noise and looking up and seeing -- it actually looked -- the >> lowest floor of fire in the south tower actually looked like >> someone had planted explosives around it because the whole >> bottom I could see -- I could see two sides of it and the other >> side -- it just looked like that floor blew out. I looked up and >> you could actually see everything blew out on the one floor. I >> thought, geez, this looks like an explosion up there, it blew >> out. >> >> I should say that people in the street and myself included >> thought that the roar was so loud that the explosive - bombs >> were going off inside the building. >> >> The sight of the jumpers was horrible and the turning around and >> seeing that first tower come down was unbelieveable. The sound >> it made. As I said I thought the terrorists planted explosives >> somewhere in the building. That's how loud it was, crackling >> explosive, a wall. That's about it. Any questions? >> Interview, 10/16/01, New York Times >> >> My initial reaction was that this was exactly the way it looks >> when they show you those implosions on TV. >> >> >> Then we heard a rumble, some twisting metal, we looked up in the >> air, and to be totally honest, at first, I don't know exactly -- >> but it looked to me just like an explosion. It didn't look like >> the building was coming down, it looked like just one floor had >> blown completely outside of it. > Imagine that. Two of the tallest buildings in the world Wrong. > are collapsing They are exploding and disintegrating. > at an alarming rate, and civilians hear loud pops that > the claim 'sound like' bombs or explosions. You delusions forced you to fail to comprehend what you read. Have someone help you read and comprehend this quote: "Somewhere around the middle of the World Trade Center, there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building." If you're unable to find any help, watch a video of the demolition. The building isn't gradually bending or sagging due to gradual weakening steel caused by heat. It's is quite literally exploding and disintegrating. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjfoXbyffso&feature=related -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Iarnrod on 1 Oct 2009 11:12
On Oct 1, 7:57 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > Daniel wrote: > > On Sep 24, 8:10 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > >> Why do you refuse to read, think or study the evidence? > > The only credible evidence contradicts your k00k theories. > > Let us know what you're disputing from the write > up below. It proves that fires couldn't have caused > the free fall and symmetric drop of WTC7's hurricane > and earth quake resistant steel frame. No it doesn't. |