911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: PV on 1 Oct 2009 17:51 Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> writes: >> Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds > >There was a volcano in lower Manhattan that day? The world must have >missed that. I love that he uses that word. It never appeared in a chewie post until the day after I used it on HIM. * -- * PV Something like badgers, something like lizards, and something like corkscrews.
From: PV on 1 Oct 2009 17:58 Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> writes: >On Oct 1, 1:26�pm, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> �~ BG > >Are you fucked in the head, KKKook? Is he *ever*. Brad also believes the moon landings never happened. * -- * PV Something like badgers, something like lizards, and something like corkscrews.
From: knews4u2chew on 1 Oct 2009 18:00 On Oct 1, 2:35 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > Innews:852aa34a-add3-464d-abed-3068ff9b03db(a)g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com, > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > > > > On Oct 1, 12:22 pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > >> In article > >> <dd6e9f5e-86fd-4222-a0ae-dde189490...(a)d9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, > > >> <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>> On Oct 1, 8:13=A0am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>>> On Oct 1, 7:58=A0am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > > >>>>> Daniel wrote: > >>>>>> On Sep 23, 3:49 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > >>>>>>> =A0 And even there had been, it couldn't have melted the > >>>>>>> steel, > >>>>>> It didn't melt the steel, and it didn't have to. > > >>>>> =A0 We know the fires didn't melt the steel. Only thermite > >>>>> explains it. > > >>>> No steel melted, and it is physically impossible for thermite > >>>> to produce what happened on 9/11. Other than that, Hankie, > >>>> you're still batting 0.000. > > >>> How does one become such a liar? > > >> There is no eyewitness reports of molten steel on the pile at > >> WTC. > >> All the reports are second-hand. > > >> -- > > So who took the "first hand" evidence away? > > There are EYEWITNESS accounts of "red hot flowing molten" > > SOMETHING. > > Even if that fantasy were true, it's not proof that it was steel. > Moreover, you've never shown how any controlled demolition has ever > resulted in pools of molten steel. > > > The eyewitness couldn't cart the "evidence" away because it was > > CONTROLLED. > > ANY "true scientific" analysis is "IMPOSSIBLE" since the > > evidence "we" > > have is "in dispute." > > So you have no proof for your claims because it's your claim that > all the proof was stolen. Do you have any proof of THAT claim? Where is the building? Where is the rubble? Who has it? Did it disappear? If there is none does that mean the buildings never existed? How convenient.
From: Iarnrod on 1 Oct 2009 18:25 On Oct 1, 3:14 pm, DanB <a...(a)some.net> wrote: > Iarnrod wrote: > > On Oct 1, 12:51 am, DanB <a...(a)some.net> wrote: > >> Iarnrod wrote: > >>> On Sep 30, 5:49 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > >>>> A controlled demolition could have bee performed in many manners not > >>>> seen as "standard" demolitions. > >>> No it could not have. > >> Not sure what bees have to do with this but you need a comma after 'No'. > > > No I don't. > > Yes you do. No I, don't.
From: Iarnrod on 1 Oct 2009 18:26
On Oct 1, 2:34 pm, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 20, 2:47 pm, "Kirby M. Wilson" <kir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > n Aug 20, 1:07 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > > >http://www.voltairnet.org/article16636.html > > >http://algxy.com/psych/9-11sceario.htmlhttp://libertycalling.com/cmom.... > > > If only George Bush Jr. and his Jewish Illuminati conspirators would > > stop their terrorist activities > > http://www.metroactive.com/metro/09.09.09/cover-0936.html > > ~ BG Wow, you ARE fucked in the head!! |