911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: AllYou! on 30 Sep 2009 07:18 In news:c099b20c-32f0-487d-8c59-00b4c0edcb97(a)y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused: > On Sep 29, 1:37 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> Got anything besides your usual ad hominem and arm waving? >> >> I do neither. > > Liar. LOL! >>> You are blind. >>> You think everyone is more ignorant than you and will eat up >>> your >>> swill. >>> You lie. > You are blind, deaf, and dumb. BWAAAAAAAHAAAAAAA
From: AllYou! on 30 Sep 2009 07:46 In news:3593031c-7e5f-40f7-959b-08c5b2c3245e(a)z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused: > Ad hominem. > Denials. > Lie. > Easy as 1,2,3. > > Got anything else? > Like I said, you are blind, deaf, and dumb. LOL! Give it up. Your evidence doesn't hold any water whatsoever. That's why you've given up defending it, or trying to explain it, and just post links that, in most cases, have nothing at all to do with the issues or questions being posed to you. For instance, how could a controlled demolition of a building be so precsely timed so as to create the illusion of a free fall by using a substance which, at best, can only melt some steel, and really not be capable of doing so in a vertical position? When you're cornere with such practicalities, your answers are to either post links that don't provide any answeres, or to claim that it's through the use of "black ops" operatives using technologies that they've yet to make public. Obviously, you don't mind being a fool.
From: AllYou! on 30 Sep 2009 08:23 In news:h9vicq$5kc$4(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > Daniel wrote: >> On Sep 24, 8:10 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > >>> Why do you refuse to read, think or study the evidence? > >> The only credible evidence contradicts your k00k theories. > > Let us know what you're disputing from the write > up below. It proves that fires couldn't have caused > the free fall and symmetric drop of WTC7's hurricane > and earth quake resistant steel frame. I've done that many times now, and yet, you still claim that no one has disputed anything. So here's one question that you have refused to answer..... Where, in all of modern history, has there ever been a controlled demolition which has ever resulted in "pools of molten metal that flows like a river"?
From: knews4u2chew on 30 Sep 2009 14:20 On Sep 29, 8:55 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: <lies, ad hominem, and no facts snipped> Gee, nothing left. http://physics911.net www.ae911thruth.org http://journalof911studies.com
From: knews4u2chew on 30 Sep 2009 14:32
On Sep 29, 8:55 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >Hey, you're the fuckin' bozo who thinks explosives can go off >invisibly and without making any noise. Cite? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0qnHlVTaVs&feature=related There was plenty of noise at the WTC. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=WTC+explosions&search_type=&aq=f But then again you can see or hear them if you are deaf and blind. |