911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: Al Dykes on 5 Oct 2009 13:41 In article <a9b2b9b8-2a29-42f5-aad8-13d49397aa28(a)a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Oct 5, 6:51=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> In article <f8c12e60-843f-47e3-b46a-b135a89da...(a)j9g2000prh.googlegroups.= >com>, >> >> >> >> =A0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >On Oct 4, 4:07=3DA0pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> >> In article <e8591c31-2930-460b-b10e-203db9e19...(a)q40g2000prh.googlegro= >ups=3D >> >.com>, >> >> >> =3DA0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >On Oct 4, 2:46=3D3DA0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> >> >> In article <63ec6e4d-819a-4c83-9c1d-80479509c...(a)b25g2000prb.google= >gro=3D >> >ups=3D3D >> >> >.com>, >> >> >> >> =3D3DA0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> >On Oct 3, 2:04=3D3D3DA0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Oct 3, 1:46=3D3D3DA0pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wro= >te: >> >> >> >> >> > Innews:e32b8bbc-63db-4a1e-aacb-8a37dcbcbabc(a)i4g2000prm.googleg= >rou=3D >> >ps.=3D3D >> >> >com=3D3D3D >> >> >> >, >> >> >> >> > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> >> >> >> >> > > On Oct 3, 7:11 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> Innews:216eb011-4375-45a9-a6e3-8b8c16716135(a)y28g2000prd.goo= >gle=3D >> >gro=3D3D >> >> >ups=3D3D3D >> >> >> >.com, >> >> >> >> > >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> >> >> >> >> > >>> On Oct 2, 4:39 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote= >: >> >> >> >> > >>>> Innews:6a329f66-529c-4225-b022-39c9f5eb0426(a)v37g2000prg.g= >oog=3D >> >leg=3D3D >> >> >rou=3D3D3D >> >> >> >ps.com, >> >> >> >> > >>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>> On Oct 1, 2:35 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wro= >te: >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> Innews:852aa34a-add3-464d-abed-3068ff9b03db(a)g1g2000pra.= >goo=3D >> >gle=3D3D >> >> >gro=3D3D3D >> >> >> >ups.com, >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> On Oct 1, 12:22 pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> In article >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> <dd6e9f5e-86fd-4222-a0ae-dde189490...(a)d9g2000prh.goog= >leg=3D >> >rou=3D3D >> >> >ps.=3D3D3D >> >> >> >com>, >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 8:13=3D3D3D3DA0am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.= >com> =3D >> >wrote=3D3D >> >> >: >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 7:58=3D3D3D3DA0am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)exper= >ts.or=3D >> >g> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel wrote: >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 23, 3:49 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D3D3DA0 And even there had been, it couldn't= > have=3D >> > melt=3D3D >> >> >ed >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the steel, >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It didn't melt the steel, and it didn't have to. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D3D3DA0 We know the fires didn't melt the stee= >l. On=3D >> >ly >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> thermite explains it. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> No steel melted, and it is physically impossible fo= >r >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> thermite to produce what happened on 9/11. Other th= >an >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> that, Hankie, you're still batting 0.000. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> How does one become such a liar? >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> There is no eyewitness reports of molten steel on the= > pi=3D >> >le >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> at WTC. >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> All the reports are second-hand. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> -- >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> So who took the "first hand" evidence away? >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> There are EYEWITNESS accounts of "red hot flowing molt= >en" >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> SOMETHING. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> Even if that fantasy were true, it's not proof that it = >was >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> steel. Moreover, you've never shown how any controlled >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> demolition has ever resulted in pools of molten steel. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> The eyewitness couldn't cart the "evidence" away becau= >se =3D >> >it >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> was CONTROLLED. >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> ANY "true scientific" analysis is "IMPOSSIBLE" since t= >he >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> evidence "we" >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> have is "in dispute." >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> So you have no proof for your claims because it's your = >cla=3D >> >im >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> that all the proof was stolen. Do you have any proof of= > TH=3D >> >AT >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> claim? >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>> Where is the building? >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> In the middle of the largest city in the world. >> >> >> >> >> > >>> Liar. >> >> >> >> > >>> It was hauled away under heavy guard. >> >> >> >> >> > >> In the middle of one of the largest cities in the world, an= >d >> >> >> >> > >> then over to various sites to which almost anyone had acces= >s. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>> Who has it? >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> Did you expect it to be saved forever? >> >> >> >> >> > >>> No answer noted. >> >> >> >> >> > >> Yes, your non answer is noted. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>> Did it disappear? >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> Not before it was thouroughly examined by anyone who want= >ed =3D >> >to >> >> >> >> > >>>> see it. >> >> >> >> >> > >>> Liar. >> >> >> >> >> > >> Prove it. >> >> >> >> >> > >>> And the evidence of what was examined has been ignored. >> >> >> >> >> > >> All the real evidence of what happened was thoroughly inclu= >ded >> >> >> >> > >> in the determination of the real conclusion. >> >> >> >> >> > >>> So you and the report writers lie about it. >> >> >> >> >> > >> Prove it. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>> If there is none does that mean the buildings never exis= >ted=3D >> >? >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> It means that your imaginary thermite didn't exist. >> >> >> >> >> > >>> Liar. >> >> >> >> > >>>http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Na= >no-=3D >> >1.p=3D3D >> >> >df >> >> >> >> >> > >> Nothing there is proof of anything at all. It's all just >> >> >> >> > >> fantasies and arm waving. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>> How convenient. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> So all of your proof is that THE truth is convenient? >> >> >> >> >> > >>> The truth is the truth. >> >> >> >> >> > >> Of which you seem to be incapable of recognizing. >> >> >> >> >> > >>> You are in denial. >> >> >> >> >> > >> Of fantasies. >> >> >> >> >> > > Your Mossad tactics. >> >> >> >> > >http://www.google.com/search?hl=3D3D3D3Den&rlz=3D3D3D3D1G1GGL= >Q_ENUS3=3D >> >45&q=3D3D3D=3D3D >> >> >3Ddisinfo=3D3D3D >> >> >> >+tact... >> >> >> >> >> > So THAT's where you learned your tactics. =3D3D3DA0got it. >> >> >> >> >> He's finally exposing himself for the anti-semitic kooker he is.= > It >> >> >> >> all comes down to the evil joooooooooos for these asswipes. >> >> >> >> >http://rense.com/general87/nhe.htm >> >> >> >> >Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass media= > is >> >> >> >owned and controlled by Zionist Jews. This is a statement of fact = >and >> >> >> >should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way. >> >> >> >> What does this have to do with the eyewitnesses, possibly as many a= >s >> >> >> 100,000 that saw to some aspect of 9/11 and none of whom have joine= >d >> >> >> any "truth" movement. >> >> >> >"None?" >> >> >Proof? >> >> >> Name one. >> >> >> -- >> >> Al Dykes >> >> >You made the claim. >> >You back it up. >> >Liar snippage noted. > >> Here is the list of all the eyewitnesses I know of that have joined the T= >ruth Movement. >> >> 1. >> 2. >> 3. >> >> You are welcome to add to it. Names, please. Not URLS. >> >> -- >> Al Dykes > >So, you live under a Zionist rock. >What else is new? >You are nothing. >You provide nothing but distractions. >You snip the links provided and arm wave. >Who do you work for? >Do you live in america? >Are you a citizen? >How many other nyms do you use? >How long have you been working as a disinfo agent? >http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html BEEP BEEP BEEP k00k makes ad hominem attack instead of addressing point BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP k00k changes topics instead of addressing point BEEP BEEP BEEP -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
From: knews4u2chew on 5 Oct 2009 14:26 On Oct 5, 10:41 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > In article <a9b2b9b8-2a29-42f5-aad8-13d49397a...(a)a39g2000pre.googlegroups..com>, > > > > <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >On Oct 5, 6:51=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > >> In article <f8c12e60-843f-47e3-b46a-b135a89da...(a)j9g2000prh.googlegroups.= > >com>, > > >> =A0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >On Oct 4, 4:07=3DA0pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > >> >> In article <e8591c31-2930-460b-b10e-203db9e19...(a)q40g2000prh.googlegro= > >ups=3D > >> >.com>, > > >> >> =3DA0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> >On Oct 4, 2:46=3D3DA0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > >> >> >> In article <63ec6e4d-819a-4c83-9c1d-80479509c...(a)b25g2000prb.google= > >gro=3D > >> >ups=3D3D > >> >> >.com>, > > >> >> >> =3D3DA0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >On Oct 3, 2:04=3D3D3DA0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Oct 3, 1:46=3D3D3DA0pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wro= > >te: > > >> >> >> >> > Innews:e32b8bbc-63db-4a1e-aacb-8a37dcbcbabc(a)i4g2000prm.googleg= > >rou=3D > >> >ps.=3D3D > >> >> >com=3D3D3D > >> >> >> >, > >> >> >> >> > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >> >> >> >> > > On Oct 3, 7:11 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> Innews:216eb011-4375-45a9-a6e3-8b8c16716135(a)y28g2000prd.goo= > >gle=3D > >> >gro=3D3D > >> >> >ups=3D3D3D > >> >> >> >.com, > >> >> >> >> > >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >> >> >> >> > >>> On Oct 2, 4:39 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote= > >: > >> >> >> >> > >>>> Innews:6a329f66-529c-4225-b022-39c9f5eb0426(a)v37g2000prg.g= > >oog=3D > >> >leg=3D3D > >> >> >rou=3D3D3D > >> >> >> >ps.com, > >> >> >> >> > >>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>> On Oct 1, 2:35 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wro= > >te: > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> Innews:852aa34a-add3-464d-abed-3068ff9b03db(a)g1g2000pra.= > >goo=3D > >> >gle=3D3D > >> >> >gro=3D3D3D > >> >> >> >ups.com, > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> On Oct 1, 12:22 pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> In article > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> <dd6e9f5e-86fd-4222-a0ae-dde189490...(a)d9g2000prh.goog= > >leg=3D > >> >rou=3D3D > >> >> >ps.=3D3D3D > >> >> >> >com>, > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 8:13=3D3D3D3DA0am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.= > >com> =3D > >> >wrote=3D3D > >> >> >: > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 7:58=3D3D3D3DA0am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)exper= > >ts.or=3D > >> >g> > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 23, 3:49 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D3D3DA0 And even there had been, it couldn't= > > have=3D > >> > melt=3D3D > >> >> >ed > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the steel, > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It didn't melt the steel, and it didn't have to. > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D3D3DA0 We know the fires didn't melt the stee= > >l. On=3D > >> >ly > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> thermite explains it. > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> No steel melted, and it is physically impossible fo= > >r > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> thermite to produce what happened on 9/11. Other th= > >an > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> that, Hankie, you're still batting 0.000. > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> How does one become such a liar? > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> There is no eyewitness reports of molten steel on the= > > pi=3D > >> >le > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> at WTC. > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> All the reports are second-hand. > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> -- > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> So who took the "first hand" evidence away? > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> There are EYEWITNESS accounts of "red hot flowing molt= > >en" > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> SOMETHING. > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> Even if that fantasy were true, it's not proof that it = > >was > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> steel. Moreover, you've never shown how any controlled > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> demolition has ever resulted in pools of molten steel. > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> The eyewitness couldn't cart the "evidence" away becau= > >se =3D > >> >it > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> was CONTROLLED. > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> ANY "true scientific" analysis is "IMPOSSIBLE" since t= > >he > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> evidence "we" > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> have is "in dispute." > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> So you have no proof for your claims because it's your = > >cla=3D > >> >im > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> that all the proof was stolen. Do you have any proof of= > > TH=3D > >> >AT > >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> claim? > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>> Where is the building? > > >> >> >> >> > >>>> In the middle of the largest city in the world. > > >> >> >> >> > >>> Liar. > >> >> >> >> > >>> It was hauled away under heavy guard. > > >> >> >> >> > >> In the middle of one of the largest cities in the world, an= > >d > >> >> >> >> > >> then over to various sites to which almost anyone had acces= > >s. > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>> Who has it? > > >> >> >> >> > >>>> Did you expect it to be saved forever? > > >> >> >> >> > >>> No answer noted. > > >> >> >> >> > >> Yes, your non answer is noted. > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>> Did it disappear? > > >> >> >> >> > >>>> Not before it was thouroughly examined by anyone who want= > >ed =3D > >> >to > >> >> >> >> > >>>> see it. > > >> >> >> >> > >>> Liar. > > >> >> >> >> > >> Prove it. > > >> >> >> >> > >>> And the evidence of what was examined has been ignored. > > >> >> >> >> > >> All the real evidence of what happened was thoroughly inclu= > >ded > >> >> >> >> > >> in the determination of the real conclusion. > > >> >> >> >> > >>> So you and the report writers lie about it. > > >> >> >> >> > >> Prove it. > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>> If there is none does that mean the buildings never exis= > >ted=3D > >> >? > > >> >> >> >> > >>>> It means that your imaginary thermite didn't exist. > > >> >> >> >> > >>> Liar. > >> >> >> >> > >>>http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Na= > >no-=3D > >> >1.p=3D3D > >> >> >df > > >> >> >> >> > >> Nothing there is proof of anything at all. It's all just > >> >> >> >> > >> fantasies and arm waving. > > >> >> >> >> > >>>>> How convenient. > > >> >> >> >> > >>>> So all of your proof is that THE truth is convenient? > > >> >> >> >> > >>> The truth is the truth. > > >> >> >> >> > >> Of which you seem to be incapable of recognizing. > > >> >> >> >> > >>> You are in denial. > > >> >> >> >> > >> Of fantasies. > > >> >> >> >> > > Your Mossad tactics. > >> >> >> >> > >http://www.google.com/search?hl=3D3D3D3Den&rlz=3D3D3D3D1G1GGL= > >Q_ENUS3=3D > >> >45&q=3D3D3D=3D3D > >> >> >3Ddisinfo=3D3D3D > >> >> >> >+tact... > > >> >> >> >> > So THAT's where you learned your tactics. =3D3D3DA0got it.. > > >> >> >> >> He's finally exposing himself for the anti-semitic kooker he is.= > > It > >> >> >> >> all comes down to the evil joooooooooos for these asswipes. > > >> >> >> >http://rense.com/general87/nhe.htm > > >> >> >> >Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass media= > > is > >> >> >> >owned and controlled by Zionist Jews. This is a statement of fact = > >and > >> >> >> >should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way. > > >> >> >> What does this have to do with the eyewitnesses, possibly as many a= > >s > >> >> >> 100,000 that saw to some aspect of 9/11 and none of whom have joine= > >d > >> >> >> any "truth" movement. > > >> >> >"None?" > >> >> >Proof? > > >> >> Name one. > > >> >> -- > >> >> Al Dykes > > >> >You made the claim. > >> >You back it up. > > >Liar snippage noted. > > >> Here is the list of all the eyewitnesses I know of that have joined the T= > >ruth Movement. > > >> 1. > >> 2. > >> 3. > > >> You are welcome to add to it. Names, please. Not URLS. > > >> -- > >> Al Dykes > > >So, you live under a Zionist rock. > >What else is new? > >You are nothing. > >You provide nothing but distractions. > >You snip the links provided and arm wave. > >Who do you work for? > >Do you live in america? > >Are you a citizen? > >How many other nyms do you use? > >How long have you been working as a disinfo agent? > >http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html > > BEEP BEEP BEEP k00k makes ad hominem attack instead of addressing point BEEP BEEP BEEP > BEEP BEEP BEEP k00k changes topics instead of addressing point BEEP BEEP BEEP > > -- > Al Dykes So you won't answer any of the questions. So no one knows who you are posting for. So you corrupt these threads with your obfuscations. You will not address anything here specifically. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU
From: AllYou! on 5 Oct 2009 14:29 In news:hadapp$1kl$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > Iarnrod wrote: >> On Oct 5, 8:11 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > >>> Please explain the violent 75 foot explosions seen >>> coming out the sides of both towers hundred of feet >>> below the "collapse" zone. > >> Uh, there were none. > > Your kook lies sure are blatant, absurd and just plain > stupid. Thanks for proving my point - even though it wasn't > quite what you had in "mind"... Prove there were any such explosions fo the type you describe. The rest of the sane world saw windows being blown out as the collapsing building was creating tremendous air pressure below it. What do you think you saw, and can you prove it?
From: Al Dykes on 5 Oct 2009 14:31 In article <83ad5a70-99aa-48cb-84a5-524658a78f31(a)f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Oct 5, 10:41=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> In article <a9b2b9b8-2a29-42f5-aad8-13d49397a...(a)a39g2000pre.googlegroups= >.com>, >> >> >> >> =A0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >On Oct 5, 6:51=3DA0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> >> In article <f8c12e60-843f-47e3-b46a-b135a89da...(a)j9g2000prh.googlegrou= >ps.=3D >> >com>, >> >> >> =3DA0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >On Oct 4, 4:07=3D3DA0pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> >> >> In article <e8591c31-2930-460b-b10e-203db9e19...(a)q40g2000prh.google= >gro=3D >> >ups=3D3D >> >> >.com>, >> >> >> >> =3D3DA0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> >On Oct 4, 2:46=3D3D3DA0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> >> >> >> In article <63ec6e4d-819a-4c83-9c1d-80479509c...(a)b25g2000prb.goo= >gle=3D >> >gro=3D3D >> >> >ups=3D3D3D >> >> >> >.com>, >> >> >> >> >> =3D3D3DA0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Oct 3, 2:04=3D3D3D3DA0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 3, 1:46=3D3D3D3DA0pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net= >> wro=3D >> >te: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Innews:e32b8bbc-63db-4a1e-aacb-8a37dcbcbabc(a)i4g2000prm.goog= >leg=3D >> >rou=3D3D >> >> >ps.=3D3D3D >> >> >> >com=3D3D3D3D >> >> >> >> >, >> >> >> >> >> > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> >> >> >> >> >> > > On Oct 3, 7:11 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrot= >e: >> >> >> >> >> > >> Innews:216eb011-4375-45a9-a6e3-8b8c16716135(a)y28g2000prd.= >goo=3D >> >gle=3D3D >> >> >gro=3D3D3D >> >> >> >ups=3D3D3D3D >> >> >> >> >.com, >> >> >> >> >> > >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> On Oct 2, 4:39 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wr= >ote=3D >> >: >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> Innews:6a329f66-529c-4225-b022-39c9f5eb0426(a)v37g2000pr= >g.g=3D >> >oog=3D3D >> >> >leg=3D3D3D >> >> >> >rou=3D3D3D3D >> >> >> >> >ps.com, >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>> On Oct 1, 2:35 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> = >wro=3D >> >te: >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> Innews:852aa34a-add3-464d-abed-3068ff9b03db(a)g1g2000p= >ra.=3D >> >goo=3D3D >> >> >gle=3D3D3D >> >> >> >gro=3D3D3D3D >> >> >> >> >ups.com, >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> muse= >d: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> On Oct 1, 12:22 pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wro= >te: >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> In article >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> <dd6e9f5e-86fd-4222-a0ae-dde189490...(a)d9g2000prh.g= >oog=3D >> >leg=3D3D >> >> >rou=3D3D3D >> >> >> >ps.=3D3D3D3D >> >> >> >> >com>, >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 8:13=3D3D3D3D3DA0am, Iarnrod <iarn...@y= >ahoo.=3D >> >com> =3D3D >> >> >wrote=3D3D3D >> >> >> >: >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 7:58=3D3D3D3D3DA0am, Henry <9-11tr...@= >exper=3D >> >ts.or=3D3D >> >> >g> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 23, 3:49 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.o= >rg> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D3D3D3DA0 And even there had been, it cou= >ldn't=3D >> > have=3D3D >> >> > melt=3D3D3D >> >> >> >ed >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the steel, >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It didn't melt the steel, and it didn't have t= >o. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D3D3D3DA0 We know the fires didn't melt the= > stee=3D >> >l. On=3D3D >> >> >ly >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> thermite explains it. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> No steel melted, and it is physically impossible= > fo=3D >> >r >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> thermite to produce what happened on 9/11. Other= > th=3D >> >an >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> that, Hankie, you're still batting 0.000. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> How does one become such a liar? >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> There is no eyewitness reports of molten steel on = >the=3D >> > pi=3D3D >> >> >le >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> at WTC. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> All the reports are second-hand. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> -- >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> So who took the "first hand" evidence away? >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> There are EYEWITNESS accounts of "red hot flowing m= >olt=3D >> >en" >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> SOMETHING. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> Even if that fantasy were true, it's not proof that = >it =3D >> >was >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> steel. Moreover, you've never shown how any controll= >ed >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> demolition has ever resulted in pools of molten stee= >l. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> The eyewitness couldn't cart the "evidence" away be= >cau=3D >> >se =3D3D >> >> >it >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> was CONTROLLED. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> ANY "true scientific" analysis is "IMPOSSIBLE" sinc= >e t=3D >> >he >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> evidence "we" >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>>> have is "in dispute." >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> So you have no proof for your claims because it's yo= >ur =3D >> >cla=3D3D >> >> >im >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> that all the proof was stolen. Do you have any proof= > of=3D >> > TH=3D3D >> >> >AT >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>>> claim? >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>> Where is the building? >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> In the middle of the largest city in the world. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> Liar. >> >> >> >> >> > >>> It was hauled away under heavy guard. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In the middle of one of the largest cities in the world,= > an=3D >> >d >> >> >> >> >> > >> then over to various sites to which almost anyone had ac= >ces=3D >> >s. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>> Who has it? >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> Did you expect it to be saved forever? >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> No answer noted. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Yes, your non answer is noted. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>> Did it disappear? >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> Not before it was thouroughly examined by anyone who w= >ant=3D >> >ed =3D3D >> >> >to >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> see it. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> Liar. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Prove it. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> And the evidence of what was examined has been ignored. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> All the real evidence of what happened was thoroughly in= >clu=3D >> >ded >> >> >> >> >> > >> in the determination of the real conclusion. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> So you and the report writers lie about it. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Prove it. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>> If there is none does that mean the buildings never e= >xis=3D >> >ted=3D3D >> >> >? >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> It means that your imaginary thermite didn't exist. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> Liar. >> >> >> >> >> > >>>http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and= >_Na=3D >> >no-=3D3D >> >> >1.p=3D3D3D >> >> >> >df >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Nothing there is proof of anything at all. It's all just >> >> >> >> >> > >> fantasies and arm waving. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>>> How convenient. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> So all of your proof is that THE truth is convenient? >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> The truth is the truth. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Of which you seem to be incapable of recognizing. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> You are in denial. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Of fantasies. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Your Mossad tactics. >> >> >> >> >> > >http://www.google.com/search?hl=3D3D3D3D3Den&rlz=3D3D3D3D3= >D1G1GGL=3D >> >Q_ENUS3=3D3D >> >> >45&q=3D3D3D3D=3D3D3D >> >> >> >3Ddisinfo=3D3D3D3D >> >> >> >> >+tact... >> >> >> >> >> >> > So THAT's where you learned your tactics. =3D3D3D3DA0got it= >. >> >> >> >> >> >> He's finally exposing himself for the anti-semitic kooker he = >is.=3D >> > It >> >> >> >> >> all comes down to the evil joooooooooos for these asswipes. >> >> >> >> >> >http://rense.com/general87/nhe.htm >> >> >> >> >> >Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass me= >dia=3D >> > is >> >> >> >> >owned and controlled by Zionist Jews. This is a statement of fa= >ct =3D >> >and >> >> >> >> >should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way. >> >> >> >> >> What does this have to do with the eyewitnesses, possibly as man= >y a=3D >> >s >> >> >> >> 100,000 that saw to some aspect of 9/11 and none of whom have jo= >ine=3D >> >d >> >> >> >> any "truth" movement. >> >> >> >> >"None?" >> >> >> >Proof? >> >> >> >> Name one. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Al Dykes >> >> >> >You made the claim. >> >> >You back it up. >> >> >Liar snippage noted. >> >> >> Here is the list of all the eyewitnesses I know of that have joined th= >e T=3D >> >ruth Movement. >> >> >> 1. >> >> 2. >> >> 3. >> >> >> You are welcome to add to it. Names, please. Not URLS. >> >> >> -- >> >> Al Dykes >> >> >So, you live under a Zionist rock. >> >What else is new? >> >You are nothing. >> >You provide nothing but distractions. >> >You snip the links provided and arm wave. >> >Who do you work for? >> >Do you live in america? >> >Are you a citizen? >> >How many other nyms do you use? >> >How long have you been working as a disinfo agent? >> >http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html >> >> BEEP BEEP BEEP =A0 k00k makes ad hominem attack instead of addressing poi= >nt =A0BEEP BEEP BEEP >> BEEP BEEP BEEP =A0 k00k changes topics instead of addressing point =A0 = >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 BEEP BEEP BEEP >> >> -- >> Al Dykes > >So you won't answer any of the questions. >So no one knows who you are posting for. Why does it matter. Reality is waht counts. There are no first-hand eyewitness reports of molten steel on the pile at WTC. All the reports are second-hand. There is no physical evidence for molten steel on the pile. There is no science that would show how the temperatures needed to maintain molten steel were created and maintained for weeks. Given that there is no evidence and no science, we can dismiss the second-hand stories as hyperbole. -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
From: AllYou! on 5 Oct 2009 14:33
In news:hadb5l$1kl$3(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>> AllYou! wrote: >>>> In news:h9b77b$740$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > >>>>> Please explain the violent 75 foot explosions seen >>>>> coming out the sides of both towers hundred of feet >>>>> below the "collapse" zone. > >>>> Even a school kid who's ever stomped his foot really fast onto >>>> an empty carton of milk knows the answer to that one. >>> But apparently (and predictably) you can't... <chuckle> >> >> I just did. > >>> Please explain the violent 75 foot explosions seen >>> coming out the sides of both towers hundred of feet >>> below the "collapse" zone. > >> Please provide proof that there were any such "explosions" of >> that magnitude > > So, nutjobs Ad hominems noted. > don't consider video evidence to be proof, eh? It's proof that windows were being blown out, and it's strong evidence that this was happening due to the extreme air pressure being built by the fact that the floors above were rapidly collapsing, and there was no where for the air to go quickly enough. What do the videos "prove" to you? > Please explain the violent 75 foot explosions seen > coming out the sides of both towers hundred of feet > below the "collapse" zone. See the above. |