From: Robert Clark on
On Apr 7, 12:42 am, hcobb <henry.c...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> The fix is to get your air launched rocket into space, but not into
> orbit.
>
> It's a Virgin Galactic style shot that just clears the atmosphere at
> roughly zero velocity.
>
> Then bring in stream of tiny impactors at 60 km/s to power an ablative
> rocket and off you go.
>
> At 60 km/s these impactors have 400 times the energy their mass in TNT
> would provide so this is far more energetic than any chemical rocket
> could manage.
>
> Where do you get the 60 km/s?  Simply launch the micro-impactors clear
> of the Earth and have them slingshot around the Earth a half dozen
> times to flip the planes of their orbits around until they're
> counterorbital with respect to the Earth and you double Earth's
> roughly 30 km/s orbital speed for the impact.
>
> -HJC

Please don't give anyone any ideas about hypersonic bb's in orbit
counter rotating to manned craft and satellites.

Bob Clark
From: Richard Casady on
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 01:28:05 -0700 (PDT), Robert Clark
<rgregoryclark(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Apr 7, 12:42�am, hcobb <henry.c...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> The fix is to get your air launched rocket into space, but not into
>> orbit.
>>
>> It's a Virgin Galactic style shot that just clears the atmosphere at
>> roughly zero velocity.
>>
>> Then bring in stream of tiny impactors at 60 km/s to power an ablative
>> rocket and off you go.
>>
>> At 60 km/s these impactors have 400 times the energy their mass in TNT
>> would provide so this is far more energetic than any chemical rocket
>> could manage.
>>
>> Where do you get the 60 km/s? �Simply launch the micro-impactors clear
>> of the Earth and have them slingshot around the Earth a half dozen
>> times to flip the planes of their orbits around until they're
>> counterorbital with respect to the Earth and you double Earth's
>> roughly 30 km/s orbital speed for the impact.
>>
>> -HJC
>
> Please don't give anyone any ideas about hypersonic bb's in orbit
>counter rotating to manned craft and satellites.

Give someone ideas? I read about that one fifty years ago.

Casady
From: Pat Flannery on
On 4/6/2010 8:42 PM, hcobb wrote:
> The fix is to get your air launched rocket into space, but not into
> orbit.
>
> It's a Virgin Galactic style shot that just clears the atmosphere at
> roughly zero velocity.
>
> Then bring in stream of tiny impactors at 60 km/s to power an ablative
> rocket and off you go.
>
> At 60 km/s these impactors have 400 times the energy their mass in TNT
> would provide so this is far more energetic than any chemical rocket
> could manage.
>
> Where do you get the 60 km/s? Simply launch the micro-impactors clear
> of the Earth and have them slingshot around the Earth a half dozen
> times to flip the planes of their orbits around until they're
> counterorbital with respect to the Earth and you double Earth's
> roughly 30 km/s orbital speed for the impact.

So, in other words, you _want_ it to fly into a meteor storm, just like
in 1950's sci-fi movies?

Pat
From: Keith Willshaw on


"hcobb" <henry.cobb(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:881ce296-2434-4c5b-85a9-ac8b44a8665d(a)w17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> The fix is to get your air launched rocket into space, but not into
> orbit.
>
> It's a Virgin Galactic style shot that just clears the atmosphere at
> roughly zero velocity.
>
> Then bring in stream of tiny impactors at 60 km/s to power an ablative
> rocket and off you go.
>
> At 60 km/s these impactors have 400 times the energy their mass in TNT
> would provide so this is far more energetic than any chemical rocket
> could manage.
>
> Where do you get the 60 km/s? Simply launch the micro-impactors clear
> of the Earth and have them slingshot around the Earth a half dozen
> times to flip the planes of their orbits around until they're
> counterorbital with respect to the Earth and you double Earth's
> roughly 30 km/s orbital speed for the impact.
>
> -HJC
>

Henry you are a certifiable idiot.

1) The rotational speed of the planet is FAR slower than the velocity of an
object
in orbit. This is why satellites in low earth object circle the planet in
around 90 minutes.

2) Orbital velocity has nothing to do with the planets direction of
rotation.
Your particles moving at 60km/sec will NOT stay in orbit

3) Momentum is conserved so you gain NOTHING even if your cunning
plan could work.

4) Your energetic particles would be put into orbit by a chemical rocket.

Keith

From: J. Clarke on
On 4/7/2010 10:33 AM, Pat Flannery wrote:
> On 4/6/2010 8:42 PM, hcobb wrote:
>> The fix is to get your air launched rocket into space, but not into
>> orbit.
>>
>> It's a Virgin Galactic style shot that just clears the atmosphere at
>> roughly zero velocity.
>>
>> Then bring in stream of tiny impactors at 60 km/s to power an ablative
>> rocket and off you go.
>>
>> At 60 km/s these impactors have 400 times the energy their mass in TNT
>> would provide so this is far more energetic than any chemical rocket
>> could manage.
>>
>> Where do you get the 60 km/s? Simply launch the micro-impactors clear
>> of the Earth and have them slingshot around the Earth a half dozen
>> times to flip the planes of their orbits around until they're
>> counterorbital with respect to the Earth and you double Earth's
>> roughly 30 km/s orbital speed for the impact.
>
> So, in other words, you _want_ it to fly into a meteor storm, just like
> in 1950's sci-fi movies?

Actually it's a clever concept even though he doesn't seem to have a
clue how to actually make the thing work.

If I understand his notion correctly he's going to put some kind of big
armor plate on his orbiter and then shoot BBs or whatever into the armor
plate to provide acceleration. That part is no crazier than GA Orion.
The problem is getting the BBs to the necessary velocity and aimed with
sufficient accuracy, and his "slingshot around the Earth a half dozen
times to flip the planes of their orbits" sounds on the face of it to be
nuts.

But if you're going to do it that way why bother with the "Virgin
Galactic style shot", why not use the BBs for the entire flight?

Engineering questions--(1) how do you accelerate and aim the BBs, (2)
how much armor plate do you need.