Prev: Relativity overturned!
Next: PORAT (the liar and theif) is defeated .. he cannot (or will not) answer
From: BURT on 27 Mar 2010 20:18
On Mar 27, 10:21 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 27, 7:20 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 3/27/10 3:37 AM, gu...(a)hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > > Hubble once again proves the Universe is expanding at an accelerated
> > > rate. But the error is that this Universe is in the PAST PAST PAST.
>
> > > The farther the Universe, the more the acceleration
>
> > NO -- You are confusing acceleration and velocity.
>
> >   but the farther
>
> > > the universe the more it is the universe of the past that we are
> > > seeing.
>
> > > So the Universe of the past was moving faster than the universe of the
> > > present....instead this would mean the present universe expansion is
> > > slowing down thus leading to a big crunch.
>
> yes yes I always confuse the explanation given for redshifts which is
> why I removed the post from this newsgroup.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

If objects are light years in distance did they travel at light speed
or less to get there?
If matter cannot move at ligtht speed these objects are older than
their distance.

Mitch Raemsch; The universe is 44 billion years old
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Relativity overturned!
Next: PORAT (the liar and theif) is defeated .. he cannot (or will not) answer