From: guskz on
Hubble once again proves the Universe is expanding at an accelerated
rate. But the error is that this Universe is in the PAST PAST PAST.

The farther the Universe, the more the acceleration but the farther
the universe the more it is the universe of the past that we are
seeing.

So the Universe of the past was moving faster than the universe of the
present....instead this would mean the present universe expansion is
slowing down thus leading to a big crunch.

From: guskz on
On Mar 27, 4:37 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hubble once again proves the Universe is expanding at an accelerated
> rate. But the error is that this Universe is in the PAST PAST PAST.
>
> The farther the Universe, the more the acceleration but the farther
> the universe the more it is the universe of the past that we are
> seeing.
>
> So the Universe of the past was moving faster than the universe of the
> present....instead this would mean the present universe expansion is
> slowing down thus leading to a big crunch.

And as for supernovas, matter increased along the year, more matter =
more gravity = more curved space.
Since gravity slows down light (time dilation), likewise more gravity.

For the above reason, science cannot assume sufficient prediction
based on supernovas and the other likewise observations.
From: Sam Wormley on
On 3/27/10 3:37 AM, guskz(a)hotmail.com wrote:
> Hubble once again proves the Universe is expanding at an accelerated
> rate. But the error is that this Universe is in the PAST PAST PAST.
>
> The farther the Universe, the more the acceleration

NO -- You are confusing acceleration and velocity.

but the farther
> the universe the more it is the universe of the past that we are
> seeing.
>
> So the Universe of the past was moving faster than the universe of the
> present....instead this would mean the present universe expansion is
> slowing down thus leading to a big crunch.
>

From: guskz on
On Mar 27, 7:20 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/27/10 3:37 AM, gu...(a)hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > Hubble once again proves the Universe is expanding at an accelerated
> > rate. But the error is that this Universe is in the PAST PAST PAST.
>
> > The farther the Universe, the more the acceleration
>
> NO -- You are confusing acceleration and velocity.
>
>   but the farther
>
> > the universe the more it is the universe of the past that we are
> > seeing.
>
> > So the Universe of the past was moving faster than the universe of the
> > present....instead this would mean the present universe expansion is
> > slowing down thus leading to a big crunch.
>
>

yes yes I always confuse the explanation given for redshifts which is
why I removed the post from this newsgroup.



From: Sam Wormley on
On 3/27/10 12:21 PM, guskz(a)hotmail.com wrote:
> On Mar 27, 7:20 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3/27/10 3:37 AM, gu...(a)hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hubble once again proves the Universe is expanding at an accelerated
>>> rate. But the error is that this Universe is in the PAST PAST PAST.
>>
>>> The farther the Universe, the more the acceleration
>>
>> NO -- You are confusing acceleration and velocity.
>>
>> but the farther
>>
>>> the universe the more it is the universe of the past that we are
>>> seeing.
>>
>>> So the Universe of the past was moving faster than the universe of the
>>> present....instead this would mean the present universe expansion is
>>> slowing down thus leading to a big crunch.
>>
>>
>
> yes yes I always confuse the explanation given for redshifts which is
> why I removed the post from this newsgroup.
>

Well that tells you something.