Relativity overturned!
in [Relativity]
|
From: cosmojoe on 26 Mar 2010 16:15 March 15, 2010, Kaunakakai, Hawaii - Einstein wrong! Relativity overturned! Luminiferous ether discovered! -Molokai Dispatch News For more details go to http://www.zyx2.org
From: BURT on 26 Mar 2010 16:16 On Mar 26, 1:15 pm, cosmojoe <cosmo...(a)hawaiiantel.net> wrote: > March 15, 2010, Kaunakakai, Hawaii - Einstein wrong! > Relativity overturned! > Luminiferous ether discovered! > -Molokai Dispatch News > For more details go tohttp://www.zyx2.org When you create new motion as in accelerating and beginning to move there is always weight. Weight is detectability. Other forms appear to move around you and relative motion shrinks in the distance. Mitch Raemsch
From: Androcles on 26 Mar 2010 16:24 "cosmojoe" <cosmojoe(a)hawaiiantel.net> wrote in message news:4bad14e3$0$16264$6d36acad(a)usenetnewsserver.com... > March 15, 2010, Kaunakakai, Hawaii - Einstein wrong! > Relativity overturned! > Luminiferous ether discovered! > -Molokai Dispatch News > For more details go to http://www.zyx2.org You are a fuckwit. For more details go to alt.fuckwits.
From: Tom Roberts on 26 Mar 2010 18:39 cosmojoe wrote: > March 15, 2010, Kaunakakai, Hawaii - Einstein wrong! > Relativity overturned! > Luminiferous ether discovered! > -Molokai Dispatch News > For more details go to http://www.zyx2.org That has insufficient detail. In particular the following are lacking: 1. what material is in the light paths? -- I'm guessing air. 2. what temperature regulation is used? -- clearly none. 3. what temperature, humidity, and barometric pressure monitoring is used? -- I'm guessing 1 degree accuracy for temperature but only used occasionally, and none for the others. Note using air (#1) is known to have serious problems, and no such interferometer in air has ever given reliable or useful results. #2 implies the results are useless -- similar measurements require temperature stability better than 0.00001 degree during measurements [#]; without good temperature regulation you cannot possibly separate a cosmic signal from temperature effects. #3 implies you don't understand the importance of monitoring all sources of systematic errors -- just saying "they are small" or "I don't think they are important" is not good enough. [#] Estimate what temperature regulation is required by computing the change in air's index of refraction for a temperature change, and the fringe shift for such a change in the index; require this shift to be much smaller than the observed fringe shift. It is not clear precisely what you are recording. I'm guessing that when you look at the image on the screen you observe the fringes drifting slowly toward one of the laser spots -- this is almost certainly evidence of temperature variations: for much longer arms, estimates of fringe shifts are < 1 fringe per rotation, so yours are ENORMOUS. But for all such interferometers to date, temperature effects have been greatly larger than the expected cosmic signal. I point out you have performed no error analysis. That is essential in modern experimental physics. If you want to convince anybody of anything, you must advance beyond the level of playing with toys. Tom Roberts
From: Sue... on 26 Mar 2010 19:40
On Mar 26, 4:15 pm, cosmojoe <cosmo...(a)hawaiiantel.net> wrote: > March 15, 2010, Kaunakakai, Hawaii - Einstein wrong! > Relativity overturned! > Luminiferous ether discovered! > -Molokai Dispatch News > For more details go tohttp://www.zyx2.org When you can sit in the rear of an aeroplane and measure its speed by aiming a police radar at the forward bulkhead, then you have detected the "Luminiferous ether" Good hunting, Sue... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superseded_scientific_theory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impedance_of_free_space |