Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to date
in [Physics]
|
From: mpc755 on 3 Dec 2009 16:36 On Dec 3, 4:31 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 3, 2:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 2:19 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 3, 12:32 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 12:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 12:10 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:23 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:16 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:14 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:00 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:47 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonsense. We certain do have a good idea how it physically works. > > > > > > > > > > > > > How does instantaneous action at a distance physically work? > > > > > > > > > > > > How does entanglement physically work? > > > > > > > > > > > > How does a particle physically create an interference pattern in a > > > > > > > > > > > > double slit experiment? (And once you respond with 'function' or > > > > > > > > > > > > 'probability' it will be noted that these are mathematical constructs > > > > > > > > > > > > and have nothing to do with nature). > > > > > > > > > > > > How is something physically delayed in a delayed choice experiment? > > > > > > > > > > > > How is something physically erased in a quantum eraser experiment? > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, you see, you've asked a bunch of questions, but you're not really > > > > > > > > > > > interested in the answers. I can see this because you instead jump in > > > > > > > > > > > with *your own* shallow, uninformed answers. You'd rather make up your > > > > > > > > > > > own answer to a question than to learn what the right answer is. I > > > > > > > > > > > take it that's because you're intimidated by learning what the right > > > > > > > > > > > answer is. > > > > > > > > > > > > So you PRETEND that there isn't any other answer other than what you > > > > > > > > > > > want to believe. This is easier for your fragile ego to swallow. > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a personality defect, MPC. It will inhibit your ability to > > > > > > > > > > > learn anything. Fear of learning often forces the insecure person to > > > > > > > > > > > make up their own answers. > > > > > > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to > > > > > > > > > > date. > > > > > > > > > > > Your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the above sentence. > > > > > > > > > > Congratulations, MPC, you're moving into fully-ignited psychosis, > > > > > > > > > exhibiting the classic symptom of thinking that your statements are > > > > > > > > > true but too advanced for other mortals to understand. It hasn't taken > > > > > > > > > you long to move to this stage, and so I expect it won't take long for > > > > > > > > > you to descend into complete breakdown and incapacitation.. > > > > > > > > > That's not what I am saying at all. I am saying your mediocre mind is > > > > > > > > incapable of understanding a photon consists of a displacement wave in > > > > > > > > the aether and the ability to be detected as a quantum of aether. I am > > > > > > > > saying your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding when a photon > > > > > > > > is downgraded to a photon pair, the pair must have exact opposite > > > > > > > > momentum due to conservation of momentum. > > > > > > > > > Of course, you think you speak for everyone, when in fact, that is > > > > > > > > just more evidence of your mediocre mind. > > > > > > > > And who have you found that DOES understand that nature behaves > > > > > > > according to your description? > > > > > > > Who doesn't understand a wave propagating through a medium will enter > > > > > > multiple slits besides you? > > > > > > > Who doesn't understand a downgraded photon pair must have exact > > > > > > opposite momentum due to conservation of momentum besides you? > > > > > > You didn't answer my question. > > > > > > Now you've added another symptom of psychosis, having imaginary > > > > > friends that think like you do, just because that makes sense to YOU. > > > > > > You do know you have a problem, right? > > > > > Do you understand a wave in a medium is able to travel multiple paths? > > > > > Do you realize the C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the > > > > aether in a double slit experiment? > > > > > Choosing to believe 60 interconnected atoms can travel through > > > > multiple slits simultaneously without requiring energy, releasing > > > > energy, or having a change in momentum vs. aether exists is the sign > > > > of a mediocre mind. > > > > > Choosing to believe the future determines the past vs. aether exists > > > > is the sign of a mediocre mind. > > > > > Choosing to believe in instantaneous action at a distance and > > > > entanglement and not being able to understand a downgraded photon pair > > > > must have exact opposite momentum in order to conserve momentum is the > > > > sign of a mediocre mind. > > > > > Refusing to believe a not at rest displaced aether physically explains > > > > gravity, quantum eraser experiments, delayed choice experiments and > > > > double slit experiments is the sign of a mediocre mind. > > > > .....aaaaand so being unable to face the personality issues that are > > > impeding your ability to actually learn anything, you fall back on the > > > reliable, passive-aggressive strategy of repeating your self-generated > > > statements over and over and over again, the verbose analog of "La-la- > > > la-la-la! I can't HEAR YOU!" > > > Anyone who chooses to believe a moving C-60 molecule, 60 > > interconnected atoms, enters, travels through, and exits multiple > > slits simultaneously without requiring energy, releasing energy, or > > having a change in momentum, is a more correct physical description of > > the observed behaviors of C-60 molecules in a double slit experiment > > vs. the moving C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the aether > > is incorrect. > > Thanks for exemplifying my previous evaluation of you. > > You'd be interesting if you weren't so pathetically transparent. Anyone who chooses to believe a C-60 molecule will enter a single slit or not depending upon detectors being placed at the exits to the slits in the future (while the C-60 molecule is in the slit(s)) is a more correct physical description of the observed behaviors of a C-60 molecule in a double slit experiment vs. the moving C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the aether is incorrect.
From: mpc755 on 3 Dec 2009 21:43 On Dec 3, 4:31 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 3, 2:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 2:19 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 3, 12:32 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 12:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 12:10 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:23 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:16 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:14 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:00 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:47 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonsense. We certain do have a good idea how it physically works. > > > > > > > > > > > > > How does instantaneous action at a distance physically work? > > > > > > > > > > > > How does entanglement physically work? > > > > > > > > > > > > How does a particle physically create an interference pattern in a > > > > > > > > > > > > double slit experiment? (And once you respond with 'function' or > > > > > > > > > > > > 'probability' it will be noted that these are mathematical constructs > > > > > > > > > > > > and have nothing to do with nature). > > > > > > > > > > > > How is something physically delayed in a delayed choice experiment? > > > > > > > > > > > > How is something physically erased in a quantum eraser experiment? > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, you see, you've asked a bunch of questions, but you're not really > > > > > > > > > > > interested in the answers. I can see this because you instead jump in > > > > > > > > > > > with *your own* shallow, uninformed answers. You'd rather make up your > > > > > > > > > > > own answer to a question than to learn what the right answer is. I > > > > > > > > > > > take it that's because you're intimidated by learning what the right > > > > > > > > > > > answer is. > > > > > > > > > > > > So you PRETEND that there isn't any other answer other than what you > > > > > > > > > > > want to believe. This is easier for your fragile ego to swallow. > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a personality defect, MPC. It will inhibit your ability to > > > > > > > > > > > learn anything. Fear of learning often forces the insecure person to > > > > > > > > > > > make up their own answers. > > > > > > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to > > > > > > > > > > date. > > > > > > > > > > > Your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the above sentence. > > > > > > > > > > Congratulations, MPC, you're moving into fully-ignited psychosis, > > > > > > > > > exhibiting the classic symptom of thinking that your statements are > > > > > > > > > true but too advanced for other mortals to understand. It hasn't taken > > > > > > > > > you long to move to this stage, and so I expect it won't take long for > > > > > > > > > you to descend into complete breakdown and incapacitation.. > > > > > > > > > That's not what I am saying at all. I am saying your mediocre mind is > > > > > > > > incapable of understanding a photon consists of a displacement wave in > > > > > > > > the aether and the ability to be detected as a quantum of aether. I am > > > > > > > > saying your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding when a photon > > > > > > > > is downgraded to a photon pair, the pair must have exact opposite > > > > > > > > momentum due to conservation of momentum. > > > > > > > > > Of course, you think you speak for everyone, when in fact, that is > > > > > > > > just more evidence of your mediocre mind. > > > > > > > > And who have you found that DOES understand that nature behaves > > > > > > > according to your description? > > > > > > > Who doesn't understand a wave propagating through a medium will enter > > > > > > multiple slits besides you? > > > > > > > Who doesn't understand a downgraded photon pair must have exact > > > > > > opposite momentum due to conservation of momentum besides you? > > > > > > You didn't answer my question. > > > > > > Now you've added another symptom of psychosis, having imaginary > > > > > friends that think like you do, just because that makes sense to YOU. > > > > > > You do know you have a problem, right? > > > > > Do you understand a wave in a medium is able to travel multiple paths? > > > > > Do you realize the C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the > > > > aether in a double slit experiment? > > > > > Choosing to believe 60 interconnected atoms can travel through > > > > multiple slits simultaneously without requiring energy, releasing > > > > energy, or having a change in momentum vs. aether exists is the sign > > > > of a mediocre mind. > > > > > Choosing to believe the future determines the past vs. aether exists > > > > is the sign of a mediocre mind. > > > > > Choosing to believe in instantaneous action at a distance and > > > > entanglement and not being able to understand a downgraded photon pair > > > > must have exact opposite momentum in order to conserve momentum is the > > > > sign of a mediocre mind. > > > > > Refusing to believe a not at rest displaced aether physically explains > > > > gravity, quantum eraser experiments, delayed choice experiments and > > > > double slit experiments is the sign of a mediocre mind. > > > > .....aaaaand so being unable to face the personality issues that are > > > impeding your ability to actually learn anything, you fall back on the > > > reliable, passive-aggressive strategy of repeating your self-generated > > > statements over and over and over again, the verbose analog of "La-la- > > > la-la-la! I can't HEAR YOU!" > > > Anyone who chooses to believe a moving C-60 molecule, 60 > > interconnected atoms, enters, travels through, and exits multiple > > slits simultaneously without requiring energy, releasing energy, or > > having a change in momentum, is a more correct physical description of > > the observed behaviors of C-60 molecules in a double slit experiment > > vs. the moving C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the aether > > is incorrect. > > Thanks for exemplifying my previous evaluation of you. > > You'd be interesting if you weren't so pathetically transparent. Anyone who chooses to believe a C-60 molecule will enter a single slit or multiple slits depending upon detectors being placed at the exits to the slits in the future (while the C-60 molecule is in the slit(s)) is a more correct physical description of the observed behaviors of a C-60 molecule in a double slit experiment vs. the moving C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the aether is incorrect.
From: cjcountess on 4 Dec 2009 15:21 This is Conrad J Countess (E=mc^2) = (F=mv^2), (E=hf/c^2) = (F=mv/r^2) = (F=Gmm/r^2) Both inside and outside the particle. At the quatum level they are equvalent. Gravity inside particle at E=mc^2 = G=mc^2 is directly prportional to gravity outside particle of (E=hf/c^2) = (F=mv/r^2) = (F=Gmm/r^2) This takes into account the energy/mass equvalence and the inertia mass/gravity mass equvalence. These are all equivalent at the quantum level, and the poster is correct when he says that space or "the aether if you chose to call it that", pushes back on matter with and equal and oposite reaction, against matter. One can say equal and opposite, or equal and right angular reation, for reasons I can explain if nesessary. The more massive the object, the stronger the push, and if a smal mass is in vicinity of a large mass, it will be caught up in the push of the stronger mass, and pushed toward it, by a measure of (F=mv/r^2) = (Fmv^2) = (F=Gmm/r^2) in direct proportion to (E=mc^2) and (E=hf/c^2) as they do converge and are equvalent at the quantum level. See:http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dsn5q6f_101hgtjv9fb&hl=en Conrad J Countess
From: mpc755 on 4 Dec 2009 17:39 On Dec 4, 3:21 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > This is Conrad J Countess > > (E=mc^2) = (F=mv^2), (E=hf/c^2) = (F=mv/r^2) = (F=Gmm/r^2) > Both inside and outside the particle. At the quatum level they are > equvalent. Gravity inside particle at E=mc^2 = G=mc^2 is directly > prportional to gravity outside particle of (E=hf/c^2) = (F=mv/r^2) = > (F=Gmm/r^2) > This takes into account the energy/mass equvalence and the inertia > mass/gravity mass equvalence. > > These are all equivalent at the quantum level, and the poster is > correct when he says that space or "the aether if you chose to call it > that", I originally called the concept Spacial Displacement. The spelling of Spacial was intentional to infer it was space that was being displaced. But then it was confusing to discuss the 'stuff of space' which was being displaced vs. three dimensional space and since the 'stuff of space' is most often referred to as ether, or aether, I decided to call the concept Aether Displacement. > pushes back on matter with and equal and oposite reaction, > against matter. One can say equal and opposite, or equal and right > angular reation, for reasons I can explain if nesessary. > > The more massive the object, the stronger the push, and if a smal mass > is in vicinity of a large mass, it will be caught up in the push of > the stronger mass, and pushed toward it, by a measure of (F=mv/r^2) = > (Fmv^2) = (F=Gmm/r^2) in direct proportion to (E=mc^2) and (E=hf/c^2) > as they do converge and are equvalent at the quantum level. > > See:http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dsn5q6f_101hgtjv9fb&hl=en > > Conrad J Countess
From: BURT on 4 Dec 2009 21:58
On Dec 4, 2:39 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 4, 3:21 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > This is Conrad J Countess > > > (E=mc^2) = (F=mv^2), (E=hf/c^2) = (F=mv/r^2) = (F=Gmm/r^2) > > Both inside and outside the particle. At the quatum level they are > > equvalent. Gravity inside particle at E=mc^2 = G=mc^2 is directly > > prportional to gravity outside particle of (E=hf/c^2) = (F=mv/r^2) = > > (F=Gmm/r^2) > > This takes into account the energy/mass equvalence and the inertia > > mass/gravity mass equvalence. > > > These are all equivalent at the quantum level, and the poster is > > correct when he says that space or "the aether if you chose to call it > > that", > > I originally called the concept Spacial Displacement. The spelling of > Spacial was intentional to infer it was space that was being > displaced. But then it was confusing to discuss the 'stuff of space' > which was being displaced vs. three dimensional space and since the > 'stuff of space' is most often referred to as ether, or aether, I > decided to call the concept Aether Displacement. > > > > > pushes back on matter with and equal and oposite reaction, > > against matter. One can say equal and opposite, or equal and right > > angular reation, for reasons I can explain if nesessary. > > > The more massive the object, the stronger the push, and if a smal mass > > is in vicinity of a large mass, it will be caught up in the push of > > the stronger mass, and pushed toward it, by a measure of (F=mv/r^2) = > > (Fmv^2) = (F=Gmm/r^2) in direct proportion to (E=mc^2) and (E=hf/c^2) > > as they do converge and are equvalent at the quantum level. > > > See:http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dsn5q6f_101hgtjv9fb&hl=en > > > Conrad J Countess- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Aether flow is important. Mitch Raemsch |