Am I oversharpening
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Bart van der Wolf on 25 Jun 2005 13:11 "Bill Funk" <BigBill(a)there.com> wrote in message news:a02rb11fpr37nllcmm7uni2d4f18n4chhf(a)4ax.com... SNIP > ".. as a woman..."??!! > Your credibility is running away from you. Credibility?
From: Bart van der Wolf on 25 Jun 2005 13:39 <jennifer.wilson2(a)lycos.com> wrote in message news:1119713827.581194.90690(a)f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > > > Bart van der Wolf wrote: >> It was already clear that you don't understand the >> difference between monochrome (single color), and >> spectral band. Each sensel is natively sensitive to a >> spectrum of roughly 350 to 1000 nm, and filters restrict >> that to 3 (sometimes 4) slightly overlapping spectral >> bands. > > > George is right, Sure. Why should you contradict yourself? Yawn. Bart
From: Ray Fischer on 25 Jun 2005 14:26 <jennifer.wilson2(a)lycos.com> wrote: >KennyJr wrote: >> I've spent the last several days reading up on the foveon image sensor >> and I've got to say that I like the idea. One pixel site reading all >> three colors. It's a good idea with a lot of promise. >> >> I've also spent the last several days looking at pictures from Sigma SD9 >> and SD10 cameras. So far I haven't been impressed. > >I did the same thing today and I was extrememly impressed. That's because you're nuts. A preddy sockpuppet. > Digital photography isn't considered ready for >prime time by most, if not all photography afficionados, LOL! Kook! -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: KennyJr on 25 Jun 2005 16:00 In article <1119712736.084304.159520(a)g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, jennifer.wilson2(a)lycos.com says... > I did the same thing today and I was extrememly impressed. Such high > quality reproduction! Digital photography isn't considered ready for > prime time by most, if not all photography afficionados, but I doubt > many of them have seen what Foveon has to offer or realize how > differently their digital technology has developed. > Your easily impressed. Please post some links to these great Sigma/Foveon images. I've asked George to post links several weeks ago and I'm still waiting. I've posted links to Sigma SD10 images as well as images from a Canon A510. Amazing how much better the pictures from the under $200 A510 compared to the $1200 SD10. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
From: KennyJr on 25 Jun 2005 21:34
Had a little time to think about this and I'd like to add... In article <1119712736.084304.159520(a)g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, jennifer.wilson2(a)lycos.com says... > Digital photography isn't considered ready for > prime time by most, if not all photography afficionados, Really? I see more and more news organizations switching to digital. Called a buddy of mine who works for the local paper and asked what kind of cameras they use and he told me Canons and Nikons. I ask about Sigma and he told me they don't have any. When I asked why they switched to digital I he told me because of the speed of going from tkaing the shot to printing the paper. I've also seen quite a few wedding photographers with digital cameras. I've see a lot of Canons, Nikons, and even a few Sonys. Not a single Sigma. When my niece got her graduation pictures taken the photographer used a Canon digital camera. In fact most of the pros I use are now using digital for at least some, if not most, of their photography. > but I doubt > many of them have seen what Foveon has to offer Chances are they have seen what Sigma/Foveon has to offer and aren't impressed. > or realize how > differently their digital technology has developed. > Different doesn't always mean better. I'm still waiting for a link to one of these great Sigma/Foveon images. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |