American Third Position Political Party
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: The detached observer, or semi-bad day in the mountains
Next: Anyone here use a Panasonic DMW-LT55 Teleconverter?
From: HEMI-Powered on 17 Jan 2010 12:12 Beam Me Up Scotty added these comments in the current discussion du jour ... >> Both left and right agree that the existing two-party >> system cannot handle the problems facing America. >> > There is no proof of that. Mostly we see that Liberalism and > Socialist plans installed are failing. > Socialist plans ALWAYS fail, no matter what country they are tried in. Sadly, though, the differences between the Red party, which are supposed to be conservatives,and the blue party, which are supposed to be literals are VERY small. By their actions, NONE have read the Constitution and NONE have any idea that their real bosses are the American people who elected them. -- Jerry, aka HP "Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less: A Handbook for Slashing Gas Prices and Solving Our Energy Crisis" - Newt Gingrich
From: Ray Fischer on 17 Jan 2010 13:23 HEMI-Powered <none(a)none.gn> wrote: >Beam Me Up Scotty added these comments in the current discussion >du jour ... >>> Both left and right agree that the existing two-party >>> system cannot handle the problems facing America. >>> >> There is no proof of that. Mostly we see that Liberalism and >> Socialist plans installed are failing. >> >Socialist plans ALWAYS fail, no matter what country they are tried >in. Rightards always find something to dislike about "socialist" plans. If they succeed in keeping people healthy then the must fail for costing money. If they succeed for being cheaper than the alternative, then they must fail for not spending enough in certain cases. And if a "socialist" plan succeeds then the rightards will insist that it cannot be "socialist". Anything to justify selfish greed. > Sadly, though, the differences between the Red party, which are >supposed to be conservatives,and the blue party, which are supposed Fascists hate liberalism and will fabricate justifications to hate liberalism. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: JerryD(upstateNY) on 17 Jan 2010 17:43 Ray Fischer" wrote in message ....And if a "socialist" plan succeeds then the rightards will insist that it cannot be "socialist". Cuba has a socialist plan that is succeeding as well as any have, why don't you go there and live ? It shoud be like heaven to you. Everyone put everyting they own into a pot and everyone take what they need from the pot. Sounds perfect, doesn't it ? NITWIT !!! -- JerryD(upstateNY)
From: Bruce on 17 Jan 2010 18:09 On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 05:55:07 -0600, Wing Ding <wingding6(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On 2010-01-16 07:23:54 -0600, striker714(a)mail.com said: > >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtAAw4cBevk >> >> Both left and right agree that the existing two-party >> system cannot handle the problems facing America. >> >> striker > >we're past that - Thomas Jefferson said we need a revolution every 200 >years. He was right on the theory but wrong on the time. We need >revolution. Flush the political toilet and start anew. > >Discuss. If there was a revolution now, the future of the US would be turned over to what is now the extreme right wing of the Republican Party. I don't like in the US, but I cannot think of a more repulsive political agenda.
From: GMAN on 17 Jan 2010 18:13
In article <d467l5l48t3tgd6173ihm95daclvel97kn(a)4ax.com>, Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 05:55:07 -0600, Wing Ding <wingding6(a)hotmail.com> >wrote: >>On 2010-01-16 07:23:54 -0600, striker714(a)mail.com said: >> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtAAw4cBevk >>> >>> Both left and right agree that the existing two-party >>> system cannot handle the problems facing America. >>> >>> striker >> >>we're past that - Thomas Jefferson said we need a revolution every 200 >>years. He was right on the theory but wrong on the time. We need >>revolution. Flush the political toilet and start anew. >> >>Discuss. > > >If there was a revolution now, the future of the US would be turned >over to what is now the extreme right wing of the Republican Party. > >I don't like in the US, but I cannot think of a more repulsive >political agenda. > I can, liberal. Take my money i worked hard for and give it to the likes of you? I dont think so! |