From: LOL! on
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:51:13 +0200, Ofnuts <o.f.n.u.t.s(a)la.poste.net>
wrote:

>On 31/07/2010 13:51, LOL! wrote:
>
>> Haven't you heard? I *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*,
>> *NEVER* post the marketable shots.
>
>and we *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*
>post shots of the dark side of the moon...

As we watch the resident thread-hijacking pretend-photographer trolls run
off-topic as they always do.

Never realizing just how fuckingly transparent they are.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


The rest of you, take down their online names. I don't have to, I can
already identify them all in less than 2 sentences no matter what name they
switch to next time.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

From: Peter on
"Robert Coe" <bob(a)1776.COM> wrote in message
news:ggd856574kri1vs5stl0bjhb870mveojlq(a)4ax.com...
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:18:38 -0400, "Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net>
> wrote:
> : "J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet(a)cox.net> wrote in message
> : news:i31bqb01di3(a)news6.newsguy.com...
> : > On 7/31/2010 9:10 AM, Peter wrote:
> : >> "Ofnuts" <o.f.n.u.t.s(a)la.poste.net> wrote in message
> : >> news:4c541c41$0$24093$426a74cc(a)news.free.fr...
> : >>> On 31/07/2010 13:51, LOL! wrote:
> : >>>
> : >>>> Haven't you heard? I *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*,
> : >>>> *NEVER*,
> : >>>> *NEVER* post the marketable shots.
> : >>>
> : >>> and we *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*
> : >>> post shots of the dark side of the moon...
> : >>>
> : >>
> : >>
> : >> You said it better than I. so I deleted my response to it.
> : >
> : > Who *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*
> : > post shots of the dark side of the moon...?
> : >
> : > Search flickr.com on "crescent moon" and you'll find a zillion of
> them.
> :
> :
> : The predominant theme of which is the dark side of the moon and taken by
> : you?
>
> Don't dig the hole any deeper, Peter. The point, which may have escaped
> you,
> is that what's colloquially referred to as the "dark" side of the moon
> isn't
> always dark.
>


Of course!
But I responded to a comment that I interpreted as an oblique reference to
something that does not exist.


--
Peter
sometimes oblique references are at an incorrect angle.

From: ray on
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:51:44 -0500, LOL! wrote:

> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:27:57 +0100, Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:28:51 -0500, LOL! <lol(a)lol.org> wrote:
>>>This one spotted deep in "The Bob Marshall Wilderness" where I explored
>>>the region for about 3 months one summer, living off the land during
>>>most of those months. (Camera gear charged by folding solar-panels.)
>>>Heavy snows started to fall in front of this waterfall adding to its
>>>picturesque quality. Also taken in August.
>>>
>>><http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4124/4845406935_eeee0ca97a_b.jpg>
>>>
>>>Are those enough photos now to prove that all the resident-trolls are
>>>slanderous consummate liars?
>>
>>
>>It's not exactly Ansel Adams, is it?
>
> Haven't you heard? I *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*,
> *NEVER*, *NEVER* post the marketable shots.

You certainly didn't!


>
> LOL!

From: ray on
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:08:33 +0100, Bruce wrote:

> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:51:44 -0500, LOL! <lol(a)lol.org> wrote:
>>On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:27:57 +0100, Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:28:51 -0500, LOL! <lol(a)lol.org> wrote:
>>>>This one spotted deep in "The Bob Marshall Wilderness" where I
>>>>explored the region for about 3 months one summer, living off the land
>>>>during most of those months. (Camera gear charged by folding
>>>>solar-panels.) Heavy snows started to fall in front of this waterfall
>>>>adding to its picturesque quality. Also taken in August.
>>>>
>>>><http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4124/4845406935_eeee0ca97a_b.jpg>
>>>>
>>>>Are those enough photos now to prove that all the resident-trolls are
>>>>slanderous consummate liars?
>>>
>>>
>>>It's not exactly Ansel Adams, is it?
>>
>>Haven't you heard? I *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*,
>>*NEVER*, *NEVER* post the marketable shots.
>
>
> I know that, but you seem to be trying to assert your alleged
> superiority over the rest of us mere mortals with what appear to be very
> average snapshots, the sort that one would expect from a small-sensor
> P&S digicam in the hands of an average amateur.

Come now, it's not THAT good.
From: Randal L. Schwartz on
>>>>> "LOL!" == LOL! <lol(a)lol.org> writes:

By the way, unless you're posting on behalf of:

$ whois lol.org
[...]
Registrant Name:Lord of Life Lutheran Church
Registrant Organization:Lord of Life Lutheran Church
Registrant Street1:14501 Nowthen Blvd NW
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Ramsey
Registrant State/Province:MN
Registrant Postal Code:55303
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.76342193
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:jwbaumann(a)AOL.COM
[...]

.... you should *not* be forging Usenet posts with their domain.

The accepted convention is using ".invalid" for a TLD, like:

lol(a)lol.invalid.

Please make a note of it.

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(a)stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Prev: vegetable
Next: Snowing in Early August