Prev: vegetable
Next: Snowing in Early August
From: LOL! on 1 Aug 2010 07:45 On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 03:00:06 -0700 (PDT), DanP <dan.petre(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Jul 31, 8:05�pm, Robert Coe <b...(a)1776.COM> wrote: >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:42:47 -0700, mer...(a)stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) >> wrote: >> : >>>>> "LOL!" == LOL! �<l...(a)lol.org> writes: >> : >> : By the way, unless you're posting on behalf of: >> : >> : � � $ whois lol.org >> : � � [...] >> : � � Registrant Name:Lord of Life Lutheran Church >> : � � Registrant Organization:Lord of Life Lutheran Church >> : � � Registrant Street1:14501 Nowthen Blvd NW >> : � � Registrant Street2: >> : � � Registrant Street3: >> : � � Registrant City:Ramsey >> : � � Registrant State/Province:MN >> : � � Registrant Postal Code:55303 >> : � � Registrant Country:US >> : � � Registrant Phone:+1.76342193 >> : � � Registrant Phone Ext.: >> : � � Registrant FAX: >> : � � Registrant FAX Ext.: >> : � � Registrant Email:jwbaum...(a)AOL.COM >> : � � [...] >> : >> : ... you should *not* be forging Usenet posts with their domain. >> : >> : The accepted convention is using ".invalid" for a TLD, like: >> : >> : l...(a)lol.invalid. >> : >> : Please make a note of it. >> >> You're missing the point. The Troll thinks he's Martin Luther. >> >> Bob > >This thread turned out OK. > >DanP Because, except for this one time, I stopped replying to the pathetically useless pretend-photographer thread-hijacking trolls just like you. LOL!
From: George Kerby on 1 Aug 2010 10:34 On 7/31/10 9:50 PM, in article 2010073119503382327-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > On 2010-07-31 18:49:51 -0700, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> said: > >> Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: >>> On 2010-07-31, Ofnuts wrote: >>>> On 31/07/2010 13:51, LOL! wrote: >>>> >>>>> Haven't you heard? I *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, >>>>> *NEVER* post the marketable shots. >>>> and we *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER* >>>> post shots of the dark side of the moon... >>> >>> There is no "dark side of the moon". There is a side that is not >>> visible from Earth, but it is not always dark. >> >> Yes there is! It was a smash hit album by Led Zeppelin. > > Sorry John, on this one you are not even close to being right. > > Though, if you are a true refugee of the 60's and early 70's you > probably wouldn't be able to remember who played what anyway. > "If you remember the 60's and 70's, you really weren't there." Or something like that, I can't remember...
From: John McWilliams on 1 Aug 2010 22:14 Savageduck wrote: > On 2010-07-31 18:49:51 -0700, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> said: > >> Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: >>> On 2010-07-31, Ofnuts wrote: >>>> On 31/07/2010 13:51, LOL! wrote: >>>> >>>>> Haven't you heard? I *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, >>>>> *NEVER*, >>>>> *NEVER* post the marketable shots. >>>> and we *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER* >>>> post shots of the dark side of the moon... >>> >>> There is no "dark side of the moon". There is a side that is not >>> visible from Earth, but it is not always dark. >> >> Yes there is! It was a smash hit album by Led Zeppelin. > > Sorry John, on this one you are not even close to being right. > > Though, if you are a true refugee of the 60's and early 70's you > probably wouldn't be able to remember who played what anyway. /Hangs head in shame/ Oy! So, the song with the most appropriate lyrics go:- [partial]. BRAIN DAMAGE The lunatic is on the grass. The lunatic is on the grass. Remembering games and daisy chains and laughs. Got to keep the loonies on the path. << Snipped bits out >> And if the cloud bursts, thunder in your ear You shout and no one seems to hear. And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes I'll see you on the dark side of the moon. 'I can't think of anything to say except... I think it's marvelous! Ha Ha Ha! ' Although, as not "not even close", at least both bands were humping back then. I mean, Gershwin- say Rhapsody in Blue would be further off, yes? Or Otis Redding? Ludwig Van? MJQ? -- john mcwilliams
From: Savageduck on 2 Aug 2010 00:11 On 2010-08-01 19:14:17 -0700, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> said: > Savageduck wrote: >> On 2010-07-31 18:49:51 -0700, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> said: >> >>> Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: >>>> On 2010-07-31, Ofnuts wrote: >>>>> On 31/07/2010 13:51, LOL! wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Haven't you heard? I *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, >>>>>> *NEVER* post the marketable shots. >>>>> and we *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER* >>>>> post shots of the dark side of the moon... >>>> >>>> There is no "dark side of the moon". There is a side that is not >>>> visible from Earth, but it is not always dark. >>> >>> Yes there is! It was a smash hit album by Led Zeppelin. >> >> Sorry John, on this one you are not even close to being right. >> >> Though, if you are a true refugee of the 60's and early 70's you >> probably wouldn't be able to remember who played what anyway. > > /Hangs head in shame/ > > Oy! So, the song with the most appropriate lyrics go:- [partial]. > BRAIN DAMAGE > > The lunatic is on the grass. > The lunatic is on the grass. > Remembering games and daisy chains and laughs. > Got to keep the loonies on the path. > > << Snipped bits out >> > > And if the cloud bursts, thunder in your ear > You shout and no one seems to hear. > And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes > I'll see you on the dark side of the moon. > > 'I can't think of anything to say except... > I think it's marvelous! Ha Ha Ha! ' > > Although, as not "not even close", at least both bands were humping > back then. I mean, Gershwin- say Rhapsody in Blue would be further off, > yes? Or Otis Redding? Ludwig Van? MJQ? Well there is always this one by a certain Robert Zimmerman; There's a whole lot of people suffering tonight From the disease of conceit Whole lot of people struggling tonight From the disease of conceit Comes right down the highway Straight down the line Rips into your senses Through your body and your mind Nothing about it thats sweet The disease of conceit There's a whole lot of hearts breaking tonight From the disease of conceit Whole lot of hearts shaking tonight From the disease of conceit Steps into your room Eats your soul Over your senses You have no control Ain't nothing too discreet About the disease of conceit There's a whole lot of people dying tonight From the disease of conceit Whole lot of people crying tonight From the disease of conceit Comes right out of nowhere And you're down for the count From the outside world The pressure will mount Turn you into a piece of meat The disease of conceit Conceit is a disease That the doctors got no cure They've done a lot of research on it But what it is, they're still not sure There's a whole lot of people in trouble tonight From the disease of conceit Whole lot of people seeing double tonight From the disease of conceit Give ya delusions of grandeur And a evil eye Give you the idea that You're too good to die Then they bury you from your head to your feet From the disease of conceit -- Regards, Savageduck
From: -hh on 2 Aug 2010 17:27
On Jul 31, 7:51 am, LOL! <l...(a)lol.org> wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:27:57 +0100, Bruce <docnews2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:28:51 -0500, LOL! <l...(a)lol.org> wrote: > >>This one spotted deep in "The Bob Marshall Wilderness" where I explored the > >>region for about 3 months one summer, living off the land during most of > >>those months. (Camera gear charged by folding solar-panels.) Heavy snows > >>started to fall in front of this waterfall adding to its picturesque > >>quality. Also taken in August. > > >><http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4124/4845406935_eeee0ca97a_b.jpg> > > >>Are those enough photos now to prove that all the resident-trolls are > >>slanderous consummate liars? > > >It's not exactly Ansel Adams, is it? > > Haven't you heard? I *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, > *NEVER* post the marketable shots. It also seems like you "Never" leave them online for more than 48 hours, in consideration of normal people who don't spend every waking hour on the Internet. -hh |