Another 'Found' Waterfall
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: vegetable
Next: Snowing in Early August
From: Ofnuts on 2 Aug 2010 18:44 On 02/08/2010 23:27, -hh wrote: > On Jul 31, 7:51 am, LOL!<l...(a)lol.org> wrote: >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:27:57 +0100, Bruce<docnews2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:28:51 -0500, LOL!<l...(a)lol.org> wrote: >>>> This one spotted deep in "The Bob Marshall Wilderness" where I explored the >>>> region for about 3 months one summer, living off the land during most of >>>> those months. (Camera gear charged by folding solar-panels.) Heavy snows >>>> started to fall in front of this waterfall adding to its picturesque >>>> quality. Also taken in August. >> >>>> <http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4124/4845406935_eeee0ca97a_b.jpg> >> >>>> Are those enough photos now to prove that all the resident-trolls are >>>> slanderous consummate liars? >> >>> It's not exactly Ansel Adams, is it? >> >> Haven't you heard? I *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, >> *NEVER* post the marketable shots. > > It also seems like you "Never" leave them online for more than 48 > hours, in consideration of normal people who don't spend every waking > hour on the Internet. > > > > -hh > You aren't missing anything... -- Bertrand
From: SneakyP on 2 Aug 2010 19:37 Ofnuts <o.f.n.u.t.s(a)la.poste.net> wrote in news:4c541c41$0$24093$426a74cc(a)news.free.fr: Give me a good reason to "unplonk" the idiot. -- SneakyP To email me, you know what to do.
From: LOL! on 2 Aug 2010 21:30 On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:37:16 -0500, SneakyP <48umofa02(a)WHITELISTONLYsneakemail.com> wrote: >Ofnuts <o.f.n.u.t.s(a)la.poste.net> wrote in >news:4c541c41$0$24093$426a74cc(a)news.free.fr: > >Give me a good reason to "unplonk" the idiot. Huh. How about that. He filtered HIMSELF. LOL!
From: LOL! on 2 Aug 2010 23:52 On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:27:56 -0700 (PDT), -hh <recscuba_google(a)huntzinger.com> wrote: >On Jul 31, 7:51�am, LOL! <l...(a)lol.org> wrote: >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:27:57 +0100, Bruce <docnews2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:28:51 -0500, LOL! <l...(a)lol.org> wrote: >> >>This one spotted deep in "The Bob Marshall Wilderness" where I explored the >> >>region for about 3 months one summer, living off the land during most of >> >>those months. (Camera gear charged by folding solar-panels.) Heavy snows >> >>started to fall in front of this waterfall adding to its picturesque >> >>quality. Also taken in August. >> >> >><http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4124/4845406935_eeee0ca97a_b.jpg> >> >> >>Are those enough photos now to prove that all the resident-trolls are >> >>slanderous consummate liars? >> >> >It's not exactly Ansel Adams, is it? >> >> Haven't you heard? I *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, >> *NEVER* post the marketable shots. > >It also seems like you "Never" leave them online for more than 48 >hours, in consideration of normal people who don't spend every waking >hour on the Internet. > You have only the image thieving trolls to blame. No other. Consider this a perfect analogy to doing photography with a DSLR. If you have spent too much time changing your lenses, or trying to clean grunge off of your sensor, or you had to wait because your mirror fogged-up with condensation and were desperately trying to find a way to get it to clear again (under the very same conditions that caused it), or you were hauling too much gear and couldn't make it to your destination on time, or had to fumble with a tripod in order to use one of your longer lenses (if you were lucky enough to bring either along), or you went to a public performance and then were turned away at the door because you brought a DSLR ... then you have missed the chance at getting that shot forever more. I would think that most of you would be used to missing photo opportunities by now and it wouldn't concern you in the least. It's just daily part and parcel of using any DSLR. Been there, did that, it's why I ditched using them in favor of camera designs without all these inherent drawbacks long ago. I'm not stupid. LOL!
From: George Kerby on 3 Aug 2010 11:07
On 8/2/10 10:52 PM, in article bt3f5614rjod2l0n73pvsvbbae7pimd70r(a)4ax.com, "LOL!" <lol(a)lolololol.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:27:56 -0700 (PDT), -hh > <recscuba_google(a)huntzinger.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 31, 7:51�am, LOL! <l...(a)lol.org> wrote: >>> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:27:57 +0100, Bruce <docnews2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:28:51 -0500, LOL! <l...(a)lol.org> wrote: >>>>> This one spotted deep in "The Bob Marshall Wilderness" where I explored >>>>> the >>>>> region for about 3 months one summer, living off the land during most of >>>>> those months. (Camera gear charged by folding solar-panels.) Heavy snows >>>>> started to fall in front of this waterfall adding to its picturesque >>>>> quality. Also taken in August. >>> >>>>> <http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4124/4845406935_eeee0ca97a_b.jpg> >>> >>>>> Are those enough photos now to prove that all the resident-trolls are >>>>> slanderous consummate liars? >>> >>>> It's not exactly Ansel Adams, is it? >>> >>> Haven't you heard? I *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, *NEVER*, >>> *NEVER* post the marketable shots. >> >> It also seems like you "Never" leave them online for more than 48 >> hours, in consideration of normal people who don't spend every waking >> hour on the Internet. >> > > You have only the image thieving trolls to blame. No other. > You flatter yourself. |