Prev: SR is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT - Tom Roberts
Next: SR is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT - Tom Roberts
From: John Park on 28 May 2010 02:01
"Ken S. Tucker" (dynamics(a)vianet.on.ca) writes:
> Roberts was the type of student that would do pot and
> LSD, while good students would do 3 hrs extra homework,
> drinking coffee, from the love of the subject, so that
> gives guys like us about 20-30 years experience on Tom,
> but that's the US system, liberal socialism, Tom & ilk
> pays money and Wizard of Oz sticks a diploma down there
> pants, that's why we call them dopers.

"We." So at least you admit you're schizoid.

--John Park
From: Ken S. Tucker on 28 May 2010 02:10
On May 27, 11:01 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote:
> "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes:
>
> > Roberts was the type of student that would do pot and
> > LSD, while good students would do 3 hrs extra homework,
> > drinking coffee, from the love of the subject, so that
> > gives guys like us about 20-30 years experience on Tom,
> > but that's the US system, liberal socialism, Tom & ilk
> > pays money and Wizard of Oz sticks a diploma down there
> > pants, that's why we call them dopers.
>
> "We." So at least you admit you're schizoid.
> --John Park

Park, 500 PRO physicist's call you and Roberts flunky,
dopers, it looks like an honest call ;-).
Ken
From: John Park on 28 May 2010 02:20
"Ken S. Tucker" (dynamics(a)vianet.on.ca) writes:
> On May 27, 11:01 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote:
>> "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes:
>>
>> > Roberts was the type of student that would do pot and
>> > LSD, while good students would do 3 hrs extra homework,
>> > drinking coffee, from the love of the subject, so that
>> > gives guys like us about 20-30 years experience on Tom,
>> > but that's the US system, liberal socialism, Tom & ilk
>> > pays money and Wizard of Oz sticks a diploma down there
>> > pants, that's why we call them dopers.
>>
>> "We." So at least you admit you're schizoid.
>> --John Park
>
> Park, 500 PRO physicist's call you and Roberts flunky,
> dopers, it looks like an honest call ;-).

Which 500? And remember I know how much dope and LSD I've taken in my
life, so I know what your delusions are worth.

--John Park
From: eric gisse on 28 May 2010 03:49
Ken S. Tucker wrote:

> On May 27, 1:03 pm, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote:
>> On May 27, 2:36 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>> > > We have good evidence that an e- + e+ => gamma rays,
>>
>> > Yes.
>>
>> > > I'm going to start working the conjecture v + v' => matter [...]
>>
>> > (your v means neutrino, your v' means antineutrino)
>>
>> > In the standard model, "v + v' => matter" is going to happen (where
>> > "matter" has appropriate quantum numbers); this will happen with an
>> > incredibly small cross-section. Note the neutrino and antineutrino must
>> > be of the same type (electron, muon, or tau). This is the same sort of
>> > lepton-antilepton annihilation as e+ e- annihilation mentioned above.
>>
>> > There is no instance in the history of physics of someone making a
>> > significant contribution who is ignorant of then-current theories and
>> > experiments.
>>
>> wrong, someone were under 30 at that
>> time, and definitely knew less, if any,
>> than his teachers, which were professors
>> and doctors
>>
>> i hear that that someone even had difficulties
>> doing homeworks and introduction basic
>> tests and examinations
>>
>> > You would
>> > be well-advised to STUDY what is already known.
>> > Tom Roberts
>>
>> i dont understand
>
> Roberts was the type of student that would do pot and
> LSD, while good students would do 3 hrs extra homework,
> drinking coffee, from the love of the subject, so that
> gives guys like us about 20-30 years experience on Tom,
> but that's the US system, liberal socialism, Tom & ilk
> pays money and Wizard of Oz sticks a diploma down there
> pants, that's why we call them dopers.
> Ken

Tom has a PhD in physics. How does that nugget of reality sit with your
idiotic spew?

From: Ken S. Tucker on 28 May 2010 14:17
On May 27, 11:20 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote:
> "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes:
>
>
>
> > On May 27, 11:01 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote:
> >> "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes:
>
> >> > Roberts was the type of student that would do pot and
> >> > LSD, while good students would do 3 hrs extra homework,
> >> > drinking coffee, from the love of the subject, so that
> >> > gives guys like us about 20-30 years experience on Tom,
> >> > but that's the US system, liberal socialism, Tom & ilk
> >> > pays money and Wizard of Oz sticks a diploma down there
> >> > pants, that's why we call them dopers.
>
> >> "We." So at least you admit you're schizoid.
> >> --John Park
>
> > Park, 500 PRO physicist's call you and Roberts flunky,
> > dopers, it looks like an honest call ;-).
>
> Which 500? And remember I know how much dope and LSD I've taken in my
> life, so I know what your delusions are worth.

Are you people all stoned on Dope? Read the damn paper,

http://www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/final/B/B10A/B10A.pdf

That's the 2nd time I posted it in this thread!
(It's a hard read for me, where SM is concerned).
Ken
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: SR is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT - Tom Roberts
Next: SR is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT - Tom Roberts