From: eric gisse on 28 May 2010 07:36 Ken S. Tucker wrote: > On May 27, 11:20 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote: >> "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes: >> >> >> >> > On May 27, 11:01 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote: >> >> "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes: >> >> >> > Roberts was the type of student that would do pot and >> >> > LSD, while good students would do 3 hrs extra homework, >> >> > drinking coffee, from the love of the subject, so that >> >> > gives guys like us about 20-30 years experience on Tom, >> >> > but that's the US system, liberal socialism, Tom & ilk >> >> > pays money and Wizard of Oz sticks a diploma down there >> >> > pants, that's why we call them dopers. >> >> >> "We." So at least you admit you're schizoid. >> >> --John Park >> >> > Park, 500 PRO physicist's call you and Roberts flunky, >> > dopers, it looks like an honest call ;-). >> >> Which 500? And remember I know how much dope and LSD I've taken in my >> life, so I know what your delusions are worth. > > Are you people all stoned on Dope? Read the damn paper, > > http://www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/final/B/B10A/B10A.pdf > > That's the 2nd time I posted it in this thread! > (It's a hard read for me, where SM is concerned). > Ken Did you know that Tom Roberts is a particle physicist?
From: Ken S. Tucker on 29 May 2010 15:51 On May 28, 11:17 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca> wrote: > On May 27, 11:20 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote: > > > > > "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes: > > > > On May 27, 11:01 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote: > > >> "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes: > > > >> > Roberts was the type of student that would do pot and > > >> > LSD, while good students would do 3 hrs extra homework, > > >> > drinking coffee, from the love of the subject, so that > > >> > gives guys like us about 20-30 years experience on Tom, > > >> > but that's the US system, liberal socialism, Tom & ilk > > >> > pays money and Wizard of Oz sticks a diploma down there > > >> > pants, that's why we call them dopers. > > > >> "We." So at least you admit you're schizoid. > > >> --John Park > > > > Park, 500 PRO physicist's call you and Roberts flunky, > > > dopers, it looks like an honest call ;-). > > > Which 500? And remember I know how much dope and LSD I've taken in my > > life, so I know what your delusions are worth. > > Are you people all stoned on Dope? Read the damn paper, > > http://www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/final/B/B10A/B10A.pdf > > That's the 2nd time I posted it in this thread! > (It's a hard read for me, where SM is concerned). > Ken See Appendix A. Ken
From: BURT on 29 May 2010 15:55 On May 28, 4:36 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Ken S. Tucker wrote: > > On May 27, 11:20 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote: > >> "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes: > > >> > On May 27, 11:01 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote: > >> >> "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes: > > >> >> > Roberts was the type of student that would do pot and > >> >> > LSD, while good students would do 3 hrs extra homework, > >> >> > drinking coffee, from the love of the subject, so that > >> >> > gives guys like us about 20-30 years experience on Tom, > >> >> > but that's the US system, liberal socialism, Tom & ilk > >> >> > pays money and Wizard of Oz sticks a diploma down there > >> >> > pants, that's why we call them dopers. > > >> >> "We." So at least you admit you're schizoid. > >> >> --John Park > > >> > Park, 500 PRO physicist's call you and Roberts flunky, > >> > dopers, it looks like an honest call ;-). > > >> Which 500? And remember I know how much dope and LSD I've taken in my > >> life, so I know what your delusions are worth. > > > Are you people all stoned on Dope? Read the damn paper, > > >http://www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/final/B/B10A/B10A.pdf > > > That's the 2nd time I posted it in this thread! > > (It's a hard read for me, where SM is concerned). > > Ken > > Did you know that Tom Roberts is a particle physicist?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - These are the most confused scientists. They make up what they must be seeing in their bubble chambers. Mitch Raemsch
From: John Park on 29 May 2010 16:15 "Ken S. Tucker" (dynamics(a)vianet.on.ca) writes: > On May 27, 11:20 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote: >> "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes: >> >> >> >> > On May 27, 11:01 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote: >> >> "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes: >> >> >> > Roberts was the type of student that would do pot and >> >> > LSD, while good students would do 3 hrs extra homework, >> >> > drinking coffee, from the love of the subject, so that >> >> > gives guys like us about 20-30 years experience on Tom, >> >> > but that's the US system, liberal socialism, Tom & ilk >> >> > pays money and Wizard of Oz sticks a diploma down there >> >> > pants, that's why we call them dopers. >> >> >> "We." So at least you admit you're schizoid. >> >> --John Park >> >> > Park, 500 PRO physicist's call you and Roberts flunky, >> > dopers, it looks like an honest call ;-). >> >> Which 500? And remember I know how much dope and LSD I've taken in my >> life, so I know what your delusions are worth. > > Are you people all stoned on Dope? Read the damn paper, > > http://www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/final/B/B10A/B10A.pdf > > That's the 2nd time I posted it in this thread! > (It's a hard read for me, where SM is concerned). If you have 500 physicists who agree with you, ask them. --John Park
From: Ken S. Tucker on 29 May 2010 17:24 On May 29, 1:15 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote: > "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes: > > > > > On May 27, 11:20 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote: > >> "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes: > > >> > On May 27, 11:01 pm, af...(a)FreeNet.Carleton.CA (John Park) wrote: > >> >> "Ken S. Tucker" (dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca) writes: > > >> >> > Roberts was the type of student that would do pot and > >> >> > LSD, while good students would do 3 hrs extra homework, > >> >> > drinking coffee, from the love of the subject, so that > >> >> > gives guys like us about 20-30 years experience on Tom, > >> >> > but that's the US system, liberal socialism, Tom & ilk > >> >> > pays money and Wizard of Oz sticks a diploma down there > >> >> > pants, that's why we call them dopers. > > >> >> "We." So at least you admit you're schizoid. > >> >> --John Park > > >> > Park, 500 PRO physicist's call you and Roberts flunky, > >> > dopers, it looks like an honest call ;-). > > >> Which 500? And remember I know how much dope and LSD I've taken in my > >> life, so I know what your delusions are worth. > > > Are you people all stoned on Dope? Read the damn paper, > > >http://www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/final/B/B10A/B10A.pdf > > > That's the 2nd time I posted it in this thread! > > (It's a hard read for me, where SM is concerned). > > If you have 500 physicists who agree with you, ask them. > --John Park Read "physics beyond the standard model" in Appendix A. I'll see about sharing my notes with you, they are simple. Regards Ken S. Tucker
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: SR is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT - Tom Roberts Next: SR is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT - Tom Roberts |