From: Jolly Roger on 26 Feb 2010 20:22 In article <3i6aks.lug.19.1(a)news.alt.net>, Dylan Winslow <dylanw(a)xmission.dot.com> wrote: > On 2010-02-26 13:52:58 -0700, Robert Peirce said: > > > I am still on 10.4. My wife is on 10.5. I held off on upgrading > > because I kept hearing stories about various driver problems. I haven't > > been hearing those lately. Are we all clear at this point? > > It still has problems with some firewire storage devices. That's the > only serious issue I can think of. Which problems would those be? All of my Firewire devices on all of my machines running 10.6 work fine. -- Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts. JR
From: Juan Anonly on 26 Feb 2010 23:00 On 2010-02-26 14:42:53 -0800, Jolly Roger said: > In article <bob-45FB48.15525826022010(a)5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com>, > Robert Peirce <bob(a)peirce-family.com> wrote: > >> I am still on 10.4. My wife is on 10.5. I held off on upgrading >> because I kept hearing stories about various driver problems. I haven't >> been hearing those lately. Are we all clear at this point? > > Yep. All clear. In fact, I refuse to use a Mac without it. Same here. -- Helping others to help themselves.
From: Dan Becker on 26 Feb 2010 23:57 In article <jollyroger-D7DE37.19222826022010(a)news.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > In article <3i6aks.lug.19.1(a)news.alt.net>, > Dylan Winslow <dylanw(a)xmission.dot.com> wrote: > > > On 2010-02-26 13:52:58 -0700, Robert Peirce said: > > > > > I am still on 10.4. My wife is on 10.5. I held off on upgrading > > > because I kept hearing stories about various driver problems. > > It still has problems with some firewire storage devices. That's the > > only serious issue I can think of. > > Which problems would those be? > > All of my Firewire devices on all of my machines running 10.6 work fine. I think it's the problem where new MacBooks being delivered with 10.6 don't work with Firewire. Clearly a 10.6 issue. Dan
From: nospam on 26 Feb 2010 23:59 In article <260220102357221770%NoUCE(a)address.invalid>, Dan Becker <NoUCE(a)address.invalid> wrote: > I think it's the problem where new MacBooks being delivered with 10.6 > don't work with Firewire. Clearly a 10.6 issue. that's because new macbooks don't have firewire.
From: Richard Maine on 27 Feb 2010 00:09
nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <260220102357221770%NoUCE(a)address.invalid>, Dan Becker > <NoUCE(a)address.invalid> wrote: > > > I think it's the problem where new MacBooks being delivered with 10.6 > > don't work with Firewire. Clearly a 10.6 issue. > > that's because new macbooks don't have firewire. See <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony> in reference to the above "Clearly a 10.6 issue." -- Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience; email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgment. domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain |