From: Bill Sloman on
On Jan 24, 7:09 pm, krw <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:17:41 -0600, John Fields
>
> <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
> >On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:10:53 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman
> ><bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >>Your idea of documenting an achievement is to post something on U-
> >>tube. Getting one's name on a patent is a little more difficult.
>
> >---
> >BTDT: US Patent #4,937,519.
>
> >Have you documented anything on YouTube?
> >---
>
> >>It
> >>doesn't necessarily imply mastery of a field - krw has boasted about
>
> What a sick loser, Slowman!  I "boasted" about my patentS (eight, BTW)
> because YOU specifically ASKED ME if I had and patents, implying that
> I did not and therefore you were somehow a superior being.

After I'd seen your "patents", I knew I was a superior being.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: Bill Sloman on
On Jan 24, 7:43 pm, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLe...(a)InfiniteSeries.Org>
wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:17:41 -0600, John Fields
>
> <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
> >If you think that you can use 10K (with typical rise and fall times of
> >1ns) without keeping transmission line effects in mind, then I suggest
> >you stay as far away from high-speed logic as you do from 555's, since
> >you obviously know very little about either.
>
>   And that, folks, pretty much says it all about Sloman.

It says what John Fields understands about me, which tells you rather
more about John Fields that me. That Archimedes' Lever shares that
understanding - or lack of it - is scarcely surprising.

<snip the pseudo-medical drivel>

>   His grip on electron theory or any other aspect of electronics or
> things electrical lock into step at a level that falls below that of
> eeyore.

Which tells us all we need to know about Archimedes' Lever, not that
we actually want to know anything about him, except perhaps the magic
formula fopr shutting him up.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

From: Archimedes' Lever on
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:06:55 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote:

>On Jan 24, 7:09�pm, krw <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:17:41 -0600, John Fields
>>
>> <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
>> >On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:10:53 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman
>> ><bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> >>Your idea of documenting an achievement is to post something on U-
>> >>tube. Getting one's name on a patent is a little more difficult.
>>
>> >---
>> >BTDT: US Patent #4,937,519.
>>
>> >Have you documented anything on YouTube?
>> >---
>>
>> >>It
>> >>doesn't necessarily imply mastery of a field - krw has boasted about
>>
>> What a sick loser, Slowman! �I "boasted" about my patentS (eight, BTW)
>> because YOU specifically ASKED ME if I had and patents, implying that
>> I did not and therefore you were somehow a superior being.
>
>After I'd seen your "patents", I knew I was a superior being.


Two fatal flaws. You claiming to know something, and you claiming to
be superior to anything.
From: Jim Thompson on
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:27:53 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:10:12 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman
><bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote:
>
[snip]
>>>
>>> I don't think Bill is an idiot. I think he's a reasonably intelligent
>>> person whose fatheaded personality neutralizes his ability to think.
>>
>>Actually, it isn't my fat-headed personality

Finally! Admission :-)

>>that neutralises my
>>ability to think like John Larkin - it's all the scientific stuff I've
>>learned about the world that he doesn't seem to have had the time to
>>find out.
>
[snip]

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: John Fields on
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:06:55 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote:

>On Jan 24, 7:09�pm, krw <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:17:41 -0600, John Fields
>>
>> <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
>> >On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:10:53 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman
>> ><bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> >>Your idea of documenting an achievement is to post something on U-
>> >>tube. Getting one's name on a patent is a little more difficult.
>>
>> >---
>> >BTDT: US Patent #4,937,519.
>>
>> >Have you documented anything on YouTube?
>> >---
>>
>> >>It
>> >>doesn't necessarily imply mastery of a field - krw has boasted about
>>
>> What a sick loser, Slowman! �I "boasted" about my patentS (eight, BTW)
>> because YOU specifically ASKED ME if I had and patents, implying that
>> I did not and therefore you were somehow a superior being.
>
>After I'd seen your "patents", I knew I was a superior being.

---
So thinks a chimp who has been taught to sign.

JF
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Prev: ZXSC400 LED driver problem
Next: calculate MTBF