Are TS555's really supposed to suck this much?
in [Design]
|
Prev: ZXSC400 LED driver problem
Next: calculate MTBF
From: Bill Sloman on 25 Jan 2010 17:49 On Jan 25, 6:17 am, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLe...(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:06:55 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman > > > > <bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote: > >On Jan 24, 7:09 pm, krw <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > >> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:17:41 -0600, John Fields > > >> <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: > >> >On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:10:53 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman > >> ><bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote: > > >> <snip> > > >> >>Your idea of documenting an achievement is to post something on U- > >> >>tube. Getting one's name on a patent is a little more difficult. > > >> >--- > >> >BTDT: US Patent #4,937,519. > > >> >Have you documented anything on YouTube? > >> >--- > > >> >>It > >> >>doesn't necessarily imply mastery of a field - krw has boasted about > > >> What a sick loser, Slowman! I "boasted" about my patentS (eight, BTW) > >> because YOU specifically ASKED ME if I had and patents, implying that > >> I did not and therefore you were somehow a superior being. > > >After I'd seen your "patents", I knew I was a superior being. > > Two fatal flaws. You claiming to know something, and you claiming to > be superior to anything. Fatal to whom? I'm not dead, so it obviously isn't me. I know I'm not dead, so I obviously know something, which is fatal to your argument, thus proving me superior to you. The fatal flaw does seem to be in your argument. It wouldn't be kind to wish you better luck next time - you realy don't have what it takes to compete with grown-ups. -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: Archimedes' Lever on 26 Jan 2010 01:29 On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:27:53 -0800, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >You are all hat and no horse. *DO* something. All our boys rely on MY gear.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 26 Jan 2010 01:34 On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:36:03 -0600, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >Get yourself a digital camera that can make videos, learn how to make >movies from them, and make the world a better place by displaying your >genius! MirrorMask! MaskMirror! He thinks that he rates the volcanic fury of Mt St Helens, when all he really rates is that of a lukewarm burp hole at Yellowstone.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 26 Jan 2010 01:36 On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:36:03 -0600, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >Morlock. Quick! Turn on the lights!
From: Archimedes' Lever on 26 Jan 2010 06:46
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:49:46 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >On Jan 25, 6:17�am, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLe...(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> >wrote: >> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:06:55 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman >> >> >> >> <bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote: >> >On Jan 24, 7:09 pm, krw <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:17:41 -0600, John Fields >> >> >> <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >> >> >On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:10:53 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman >> >> ><bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote: >> >> >> <snip> >> >> >> >>Your idea of documenting an achievement is to post something on U- >> >> >>tube. Getting one's name on a patent is a little more difficult. >> >> >> >--- >> >> >BTDT: US Patent #4,937,519. >> >> >> >Have you documented anything on YouTube? >> >> >--- >> >> >> >>It >> >> >>doesn't necessarily imply mastery of a field - krw has boasted about >> >> >> What a sick loser, Slowman! I "boasted" about my patentS (eight, BTW) >> >> because YOU specifically ASKED ME if I had and patents, implying that >> >> I did not and therefore you were somehow a superior being. >> >> >After I'd seen your "patents", I knew I was a superior being. >> >> � Two fatal flaws. �You claiming to know something, and you claiming to >> be superior to anything. > >Fatal to whom? I'm not dead, so it obviously isn't me. It is called a colloquialism, you obviously brain dead ditz! > I know I'm not >dead, so I obviously know something, which is fatal to your argument, >thus proving me superior to you. You have a complex about declaring your claim of superiority, don't cha, old man? Ever seek help for that mental illness? The reason I ask is because you rate being superior to none of us humans. Maybe you are superior to a dung beetle. > >The fatal flaw does seem to be in your argument. It wouldn't be kind >to wish you better luck next time - you realy don't have what it takes >to compete with grown-ups. You keep missing the fact that there is no competition taking place, and that it is you who is clearly the 'biggest loser' in this thread, much less these groups. You lost all credibility when you declared one of the most commonly used chips in the world as being obsolete and no longer viable, when the fact is that the description you keep spewing about it fits *you*. |