From: porky_pig_jr on
On Jun 3, 5:39 pm, Akira Bergman <akiraberg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> "...you were talking well above your pay grade."
> Grigory Perelman and Garrett
> Lisi emerge

What do *you* know about Grigory Perelman anyway? Outsider? Give us a
break. He is an accomplished mathematician. You sound like an
accomplished loser.
From: Gerry Myerson on
In article
<5e0b35d0-c395-4bc2-b3c8-842365439573(a)a16g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Akira Bergman <akirabergman(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Every now and then, total outsiders like Grigory Perelman and Garrett
> Lisi emerge and show you clowns how true science is done.

I don't recall Perelman ever suggesting an isomorphism
between the natural and the complex numbers.

--
Gerry Myerson (gerry(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)
From: Akira Bergman on
On Jun 4, 8:59 am, "porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com" <porky_pig...(a)my-
deja.com> wrote:
> On Jun 3, 5:39 pm, Akira Bergman <akiraberg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "...you were talking well above your pay grade."
> > Grigory Perelman and Garrett
> > Lisi emerge
>
> What do *you* know about Grigory Perelman anyway? Outsider? Give us a
> break. He is an accomplished mathematician. You sound like an
> accomplished loser.

He has been called names and betrayed by people you just because he
did not accept the stinking rewards of the establishment.

I never compared myself to him. I do not claim to be mathematician. Do
not jump.
From: Akira Bergman on
On Jun 4, 8:57 am, "porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com" <porky_pig...(a)my-
deja.com> wrote:
> On Jun 1, 11:29 pm, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Akira Bergman <akiraberg...(a)gmail.com> writes:
> > > On Jun 2, 12:30 pm, Arturo Magidin <magi...(a)member.ams.org> wrote:
>
> > >> And since this is trivial point for anyone who uses the word
> > >> "isomorphism" knowing what it means, and knows some of the basic facts
> > >> about real numbers (e.g., that they are *uncountable*), the comment
> > >> about "credentials" was a pointed remark indicating that you were
> > >> either talking about things you did not understand (e.g., the meaning
> > >> "isomorphism"), or you were a crank (thinking that complex numbers are
> > >> countable), or both.
>
> > >> Perhaps you can put that "knowledge" and intuition of yours behind
> > >> some actual learning?
>
> > >> --
> > >> Arturo Magidin
>
> > > Now you are jumping. Porky's "credentials" comment was motivated (at
> > > least in part) by my reply to his previous frivolous "my head
> > > spinning" comment. He could not come back to that reply, so he jumped
> > > on another more suitable one. His "thanks" was for giving him a chance
> > > for a come back.
>
> > Yes, that must be it.
>
> > After all, a brilliant riposte like "Which part is spinning? The pork
> > or the pig?" is simply devastating.  Porky must have really been
> > seething over the way you bested him like that.
>
> > --
>
> Yeah. I threw away my Brown & Churchill and Ahlfors textbooks and wept
> through the whole night. Even rolling in the mud didn't make me feel
> better.

You are in the mud of conformism, formalism and mob mentality. Is that
why you call yourself a pig?
From: Akira Bergman on
On Jun 4, 9:07 am, Gerry Myerson <ge...(a)maths.mq.edi.ai.i2u4email>
wrote:
> In article
> <5e0b35d0-c395-4bc2-b3c8-842365439...(a)a16g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
>  Akira Bergman <akiraberg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Every now and then, total outsiders like Grigory Perelman and Garrett
> > Lisi emerge and show you clowns how true science is done.
>
> I don't recall Perelman ever suggesting an isomorphism
> between the natural and the complex numbers.
>
> --
> Gerry Myerson (ge...(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)

As I said, I never compared myself to him. Do not jump.

Did I hurt your feelings so much with my comments about the academic
conformism that they made you jump so high?