Prev: Everything I know I learned from TV
Next: Biggest Lie Yet Of the Spill: BP "Couldn't Determine the Flow ?Rate"
From: Igor on 5 Jun 2010 13:57 On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle > acceleration physics. But how do we know what the particle > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never > been observed to shrink either. > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the > forces within the atom itself. > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it? > They remain spherical. And you remain an ignorant twit.
From: BURT on 5 Jun 2010 14:14 On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle > > acceleration physics. But how do we know what the particle > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never > > been observed to shrink either. > > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the > > forces within the atom itself. > > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it? > > They remain spherical. > > And you remain an ignorant twit. Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided. Mitch Raemsch
From: Igor on 6 Jun 2010 10:05 On Jun 5, 2:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle > > > acceleration physics. But how do we know what the particle > > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never > > > been observed to shrink either. > > > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion > > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the > > > forces within the atom itself. > > > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it? > > > They remain spherical. > > > And you remain an ignorant twit. > > Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided. > > Mitch Raemsch Maybe you could explain just what the hell that means. I can't seem to find any such ridiculous statement in the literature. You need to be very thankful for usenet, else you'd be ranting and raving about your silly concepts on a dirty street corner.
From: BURT on 6 Jun 2010 14:57 On Jun 6, 7:05 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Jun 5, 2:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle > > > > acceleration physics. But how do we know what the particle > > > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never > > > > been observed to shrink either. > > > > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion > > > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the > > > > forces within the atom itself. > > > > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it? > > > > They remain spherical. > > > > And you remain an ignorant twit. > > > Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Maybe you could explain just what the hell that means. I can't seem > to find any such ridiculous statement in the literature. You need to > be very thankful for usenet, else you'd be ranting and raving about > your silly concepts on a dirty street corner.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - The dimensions of the matter forces change. They are no longer spherically symmetrical. The whole atom size becomes lopsided. Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 6 Jun 2010 15:25 On Jun 6, 7:05 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Jun 5, 2:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle > > > > acceleration physics. But how do we know what the particle > > > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never > > > > been observed to shrink either. > > > > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion > > > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the > > > > forces within the atom itself. > > > > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it? > > > > They remain spherical. > > > > And you remain an ignorant twit. > > > Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Maybe you could explain just what the hell that means. I Size contraction produces lopsided atoms along the direction of travel. But have you ever tried to play marbles with a lopsided marble? It doesn't work. It is the same for the lopsided atomic form. Mitch Raemsch
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Everything I know I learned from TV Next: Biggest Lie Yet Of the Spill: BP "Couldn't Determine the Flow ?Rate" |