Prev: Everything I know I learned from TV
Next: Biggest Lie Yet Of the Spill: BP "Couldn't Determine the Flow ?Rate"
From: Igor on 5 Jun 2010 13:57
On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle
> acceleration  physics. But how do we know what the particle
> experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never
> been observed to shrink either.
>
> It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion
> then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the
> forces within the atom itself.
>
> There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it?
> They remain spherical.

And you remain an ignorant twit.

From: BURT on 5 Jun 2010 14:14
On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
> On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle
> > acceleration  physics. But how do we know what the particle
> > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never
> > been observed to shrink either.
>
> > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion
> > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the
> > forces within the atom itself.
>
> > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it?
> > They remain spherical.
>
> And you remain an ignorant twit.

Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Igor on 6 Jun 2010 10:05
On Jun 5, 2:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle
> > > acceleration  physics. But how do we know what the particle
> > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never
> > > been observed to shrink either.
>
> > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion
> > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the
> > > forces within the atom itself.
>
> > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it?
> > > They remain spherical.
>
> > And you remain an ignorant twit.
>
> Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Maybe you could explain just what the hell that means. I can't seem
to find any such ridiculous statement in the literature. You need to
be very thankful for usenet, else you'd be ranting and raving about
your silly concepts on a dirty street corner.



From: BURT on 6 Jun 2010 14:57
On Jun 6, 7:05 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle
> > > > acceleration  physics. But how do we know what the particle
> > > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never
> > > > been observed to shrink either.
>
> > > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion
> > > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the
> > > > forces within the atom itself.
>
> > > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it?
> > > > They remain spherical.
>
> > > And you remain an ignorant twit.
>
> > Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> Maybe you could explain just what the hell that means.  I can't seem
> to find any such ridiculous statement in the literature.  You need to
> be very thankful for usenet, else you'd be ranting and raving about
> your silly concepts on a dirty street corner.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The dimensions of the matter forces change. They are no longer
spherically symmetrical. The whole atom size becomes lopsided.

Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 6 Jun 2010 15:25
On Jun 6, 7:05 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle
> > > > acceleration  physics. But how do we know what the particle
> > > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never
> > > > been observed to shrink either.
>
> > > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion
> > > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the
> > > > forces within the atom itself.
>
> > > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it?
> > > > They remain spherical.
>
> > > And you remain an ignorant twit.
>
> > Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> Maybe you could explain just what the hell that means.  I

Size contraction produces lopsided atoms along the direction of
travel. But have you ever tried to play marbles with a lopsided
marble?

It doesn't work. It is the same for the lopsided atomic form.

Mitch Raemsch

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Everything I know I learned from TV
Next: Biggest Lie Yet Of the Spill: BP "Couldn't Determine the Flow ?Rate"