From: BURT on
On Jun 7, 4:15 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote:
> Igor wrote:
>
> > On Jun 6, 2:57 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Jun 6, 7:05 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 5, 2:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle
> > > > > > > acceleration  physics. But how do we know what the particle
> > > > > > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never
> > > > > > > been observed to shrink either.
>
> > > > > > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion
> > > > > > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the
> > > > > > > forces within the atom itself.
>
> > > > > > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it?
> > > > > > > They remain spherical.
>
> > > > > > And you remain an ignorant twit.
>
> > > > > Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided..
>
> > > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > > Maybe you could explain just what the hell that means.  I can't seem
> > > > to find any such ridiculous statement in the literature.  You need to
> > > > be very thankful for usenet, else you'd be ranting and raving about
> > > > your silly concepts on a dirty street corner.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > The dimensions of the matter forces change. They are no longer
> > > spherically symmetrical. The whole atom size becomes lopsided.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > You left out that part about the beeblebrontz zorjniffing the
> > gribbowaxem, resulting in a catastrophic effenzorch!
>
> effenzorchi, plural - conservation laws demand antimatter symmetries.
> Oh, wait... is it a Majorana effenzeroch?  Never mind.
>
> --
> Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
>  (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

You ducked a challenge al?

Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on
On Jun 6, 11:57 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 6, 7:05 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 5, 2:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle
> > > > > acceleration  physics. But how do we know what the particle
> > > > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never
> > > > > been observed to shrink either.
>
> > > > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion
> > > > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the
> > > > > forces within the atom itself.
>
> > > > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it?
> > > > > They remain spherical.
>
> > > > And you remain an ignorant twit.
>
> > > Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > Maybe you could explain just what the hell that means.  I can't seem
> > to find any such ridiculous statement in the literature.  You need to
> > be very thankful for usenet, else you'd be ranting and raving about
> > your silly concepts on a dirty street corner.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> The dimensions of the matter forces change. They are no longer
> spherically symmetrical. The whole atom size becomes lopsided.
>
> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

There is no gravity length contraction just time expansion of the
universe.

Mitch Raemsch