Prev: DIY studio strobe
Next: Basic Tools for Surface Mount.
From: JosephKK on 1 Feb 2010 02:07 On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:15:03 -0000, "Andrew Holme" <ah(a)nospam.co.uk> wrote: > >On Jan 29, 6:08 pm, FyberOptic <fyberop...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi folks, I'm in need of some info from someone who knows a lot more >> about this stuff than me! >> >> In a nutshell, I've never used programmable logic before, but I really >> want to get into it. I think it would make my life so much easier, >> because standard glue logic means so many wires, board space, and >> potential problems. The problem though is the commercial programmers, >> and how much they tend to cost. I simply can't afford it on my budget >> as a hobbyist. >> >> I did however managed to get my hands on an ATF22V10BQL, which is the >> Atmel flash-based equivalent to a 22V10 GAL if I understand properly. >> What I want to know is, how exactly do I program the thing? Atmel >> seems to offer no information on how this process is done. I've heard >> that normal GALs require high voltages to erase and program, but this >> one being flash-based I would assume that none of that is necessary? >> I heard about something called GALblast, but then I also heard that it >> won't work with ATF chips? So I'm at a standstill on trying to find >> anything out. > >> >> Basically, what I'm looking for is a way to do this from my parallel >> port. Heck, if I just knew HOW to program them, I would consider >> designing my own programmer if necessary, if there are no other free >> schematics available out there. >> >> I would really appreciate any info anyone could give. I'd also >> appreciate suggestions on other DIP-style programmable logic chips >> that I might should look into that have easy programmability. Thanks >> in advance! > >I played with 16V8 and 22V10 PLDs a few years back. > >I used WinCUPL http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/tools_card.asp?tool_id=2759 > >and an Xeltek SuperPro Z http://www.xeltek.com/product.php?productid=16225 > >Then I got into CPLDs. > >Then I got into FPGAs. > >So I went a step at a time. You could do the same, or you might be better >off going straight to CPLDs. You can fit a lot more logic in a CPLD. And >you can code in Verilog, which is a lot nicer than CUPL. > Wow, you must be a youngster. I was doing TTL with the then new MSI stuff, was like 16 X 4 ram. Then NMOS, PMOS, and PLDs like 16L2 and 16L8 were comming out. 22V10 was years later. |