Prev: THIS IS WHAT CARL SAGAN LEARNED ABOUT HINDU PRINCIPLES
Next: PNAC of course said it "wanted" the 9/11 attacks"
From: PD on 30 Jun 2010 12:12
On Jun 29, 8:43 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 29, 9:10 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 29, 12:20 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 28, 2:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 26, 5:34 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jun 26, 10:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jun 25, 8:48 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Jun 25, 11:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Jun 25, 5:32 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Some important formulas show it's impossible for cosmic rays to
> > > > > > > > > produce 10^20 eV.
>
> > > > > > > > A formula is useless if it "proves" something cannot exist that has
> > > > > > > > been observed directly to exist.
>
> > > > > > > #1. That or the observation is incorrect.
>
> > > > > > It's independently confirmed. What now?
>
> > > > > Not really, if so then what is an electron cloud, since it's much
> > > > > bigger than an electron, then what is it?
>
> > > > > How can they tell how many electrons in a cloud if they can't tell
> > > > > it's an electron in orbit?
>
> > > > > From what I read they can't really detect particles...just mass and
> > > > > velocity by radiation deviation and momentum.
>
> > > > > Show me how their detectors determined the mass of a cosmic ray that
> > > > > produces 10^20 eV, you don't know how, and now you are precipitating
> > > > > to find how.
>
> > > > Try googling High Resolution Fly's Eye Detector.
>
> > > Well you ran nicely, and it is exactly how I said they do it:
>
> > > > From what I read they can't really detect particles...just mass and
> > > > > velocity by radiation deviation and momentum.
>
> > > The cetector cannot decipher if one or more particles are hitting it's
> > > detector simultaneously.
>
> > That's not correct.
>
> You are correcting me?

Yes. You are wrong.

>
> I know & "understand" how it works, how about you tell everyone in two
> sentences how it works. And in your own words, any idiot can copy and
> paste.
>
> Uh oh!
>
>
>
> > > It just records the energy (Luminosity) that occurs per unit of time,
>
> > Luminosity is not deposition of energy. Try again.
>
> You're an idiot, otherwise you wouldn't be saying that, brightness
> recorded tells you the entire luminosity, thus energy of a collision.

Not in particle collisions. Try again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminosity#In_scattering_theory_and_accelerator_physics

>
> If not an idiot, then a TROLL.
>
>
>
>
>
> > > all it knows is that's it's the highest light energy per unit of time
> > > from a collision ever recorded by a camera.
>
> > > Further more it defies the most dominant rule:
>
> > > Which is they need to go high up to record the higher energies cause
> > > that's where the PRIMARY collisions occur. The Fly's eye is much
> > > lower.
>
> > > Go back to school PD or should I say to your internet.
>
> > Would you like journal articles to read instead?
>
> > > > > Strange how you need the internet to convey your claim.
>
> > > > > > > #2. A brain is useless is it "proves" it cannot understand what is
> > > > > > > also written below here@!
>
> > > > > > > > >..Hawking's formula shows it's impossible for Aunt Al
> > > > > > > > > & LHC to produce a black hole.
>
> > > > > > > > > 10^17 eV cosmic ray simulation produces 14 TeV particles.
>
> > > > > > > > > In pool, a cue ball collision can cause three or more balls to stick
> > > > > > > > > together as they move forward...thus generating a higher kinetic
> > > > > > > > > energy. ....but in no way do these 3 pool balls occupy the space thus
> > > > > > > > > density of one ball, likewise for 10^20 eV to produce a black hole.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

From: guskz on 1 Jul 2010 15:56
On Jun 30, 12:12 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 29, 8:43 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 29, 9:10 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 29, 12:20 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 28, 2:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jun 26, 5:34 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jun 26, 10:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Jun 25, 8:48 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Jun 25, 11:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On Jun 25, 5:32 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Some important formulas show it's impossible for cosmic rays to
> > > > > > > > > > produce 10^20 eV.
>
> > > > > > > > > A formula is useless if it "proves" something cannot exist that has
> > > > > > > > > been observed directly to exist.
>
> > > > > > > > #1. That or the observation is incorrect.
>
> > > > > > > It's independently confirmed. What now?
>
> > > > > > Not really, if so then what is an electron cloud, since it's much
> > > > > > bigger than an electron, then what is it?
>
> > > > > > How can they tell how many electrons in a cloud if they can't tell
> > > > > > it's an electron in orbit?
>
> > > > > > From what I read they can't really detect particles...just mass and
> > > > > > velocity by radiation deviation and momentum.
>
> > > > > > Show me how their detectors determined the mass of a cosmic ray that
> > > > > > produces 10^20 eV, you don't know how, and now you are precipitating
> > > > > > to find how.
>
> > > > > Try googling High Resolution Fly's Eye Detector.
>
> > > > Well you ran nicely, and it is exactly how I said they do it:
>
> > > > > From what I read they can't really detect particles...just mass and
> > > > > > velocity by radiation deviation and momentum.
>
> > > > The cetector cannot decipher if one or more particles are hitting it's
> > > > detector simultaneously.
>
> > > That's not correct.
>
> > You are correcting me?
>
> Yes. You are wrong.
>
>
>
> > I know & "understand" how it works, how about you tell everyone in two
> > sentences how it works. And in your own words, any idiot can copy and
> > paste.
>
> > Uh oh!
>
> > > > It just records the energy (Luminosity) that occurs per unit of time,
>
> > > Luminosity is not deposition of energy. Try again.
>
> > You're an idiot, otherwise you wouldn't be saying that, brightness
> > recorded tells you the entire luminosity, thus energy of a collision.
>
> Not in particle collisions. Try again.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminosity#In_scattering_theory_and_acce...
>
>
>
> > If not an idiot, then a TROLL.
>
> > > > all it knows is that's it's the highest light energy per unit of time
> > > > from a collision ever recorded by a camera.
>
> > > > Further more it defies the most dominant rule:
>
> > > > Which is they need to go high up to record the higher energies cause
> > > > that's where the PRIMARY collisions occur. The Fly's eye is much
> > > > lower.
>
> > > > Go back to school PD or should I say to your internet.
>
> > > Would you like journal articles to read instead?
>
> > > > > > Strange how you need the internet to convey your claim.
>
> > > > > > > > #2. A brain is useless is it "proves" it cannot understand what is
> > > > > > > > also written below here@!
>
> > > > > > > > > >..Hawking's formula shows it's impossible for Aunt Al
> > > > > > > > > > & LHC to produce a black hole.
>
> > > > > > > > > > 10^17 eV cosmic ray simulation produces 14 TeV particles.
>
> > > > > > > > > > In pool, a cue ball collision can cause three or more balls to stick
> > > > > > > > > > together as they move forward...thus generating a higher kinetic
> > > > > > > > > > energy. ....but in no way do these 3 pool balls occupy the space thus
> > > > > > > > > > density of one ball, likewise for 10^20 eV to produce a black hole.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>

TROLL AWAY YOU & YOUR STUPID THEORY
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: THIS IS WHAT CARL SAGAN LEARNED ABOUT HINDU PRINCIPLES
Next: PNAC of course said it "wanted" the 9/11 attacks"