Avast Doesn't Block XP Defender malware (ave.exe)
in [Spyware]
|
From: Peter Foldes on 5 Apr 2010 18:55 > Not "frustrating" then? Depends in what context. In your case Yes -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:TYqdnVFXO8zTxifWnZ2dnUVZ8tVi4p2d(a)bt.com... > Peter Foldes wrote: >> It is also unfortunate >> > > Not "frustrating" then?
From: ~BD~ on 5 Apr 2010 19:06 David H. Lipman wrote: To be clear: > They *blocked access* to an IP and had signature detection for his plagiarized utility. Not > a crime in any sense of the word. That, dear Sir, is a matter of opinion ...... IMO.
From: David H. Lipman on 5 Apr 2010 19:14 From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> | David H. Lipman wrote: | To be clear: >> They *blocked access* to an IP and had signature detection for his plagiarized >> utility. Not >> a crime in any sense of the word. | That, dear Sir, is a matter of opinion ...... IMO. It is NOT an opinion. Even if (and this is a big if) the personnel at Malwarebytes were wrong, it does not rise to the level of a crime. The fact is I know the personnel in the Malwarebytes staff and I know what they know and they have seen the proof that Butts has been plagiarizing the works of their peers. The information they have seen goes well BEYOND the information that is publicly available. Additionally, if one was to go by your faulty logic, Butts would be acting criminally for blocking access to PCTipp Magazine, an organization within the International Data Group (IDG). The worlds largest publisher. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: ~BD~ on 5 Apr 2010 19:28 David H. Lipman wrote: > From: "~BD~"<BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> > > | David H. Lipman wrote: > > | To be clear: > >>> They *blocked access* to an IP and had signature detection for his plagiarized >>> utility. Not >>> a crime in any sense of the word. > > | That, dear Sir, is a matter of opinion ...... IMO. > > It is NOT an opinion. Even if (and this is a big if) the personnel at Malwarebytes were > wrong, it does not rise to the level of a crime. In *your* view! > > The fact is I know the personnel in the Malwarebytes staff and I know what they know and > they have seen the proof that Butts has been plagiarizing the works of their peers. The > information they have seen goes well BEYOND the information that is publicly available. I /really/ do not like secrets. > > Additionally, if one was to go by your faulty logic, Butts would be acting criminally for > blocking access to PCTipp Magazine, an organization within the International Data Group > (IDG). The worlds largest publisher. > You now seem to be telling me that, in your opinion, his tools (or some of them) *are* effecting the normal operation of a computer on line. Yet you and your peers have done *nothing* about this as far as I can tell. Is that the case? -- Dave
From: David H. Lipman on 5 Apr 2010 20:02
From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> | David H. Lipman wrote: >> From: "~BD~"<BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> >> | David H. Lipman wrote: >> | To be clear: >>>> They *blocked access* to an IP and had signature detection for his plagiarized >>>> utility. Not >>>> a crime in any sense of the word. >> | That, dear Sir, is a matter of opinion ...... IMO. >> It is NOT an opinion. Even if (and this is a big if) the personnel at Malwarebytes >> were >> wrong, it does not rise to the level of a crime. | In *your* view! >> The fact is I know the personnel in the Malwarebytes staff and I know what they know >> and >> they have seen the proof that Butts has been plagiarizing the works of their peers. >> The >> information they have seen goes well BEYOND the information that is publicly >> available. | I /really/ do not like secrets. >> Additionally, if one was to go by your faulty logic, Butts would be acting criminally >> for >> blocking access to PCTipp Magazine, an organization within the International Data >> Group >> (IDG). The worlds largest publisher. | You now seem to be telling me that, in your opinion, his tools (or some | of them) *are* effecting the normal operation of a computer on line. | Yet you and your peers have done *nothing* about this as far as I can | tell. Is that the case? I'm not going to banter about with you. It won't sink in and I'll waste my time and energy for nothing. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp |