From: Leythos on 6 Apr 2010 16:06 In article <wsSdnW1_TeAo4CbWnZ2dnUVZ8k6dnZ2d(a)bt.com>, BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk says... > Dustin Cook wrote: > > > > > Yes.. and? That's not a crime. His website offered a tool which upon > > installation would disable malwarebytes software. A direct attack, if you > > will. At that point, his program clearly became malware and was treated > > as such. > > > > > > I do not wish to argue about this. > > Malwarebytes responded "in kind" IMO. > So, you're saying that defending one's self is the same as going on the offensive? -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: Ant on 6 Apr 2010 16:51 "Jenn" wrote: > "Dustin Cook" wrote: >> "Ant" wrote: >>> Is he going to be stuck in time? Hang on a minute, are you saying he >>> was only 8 or 9 years old when you were born? >> >> No. He passed away at age 40. I'm almost 33 now. So in 8 years, I will be >> older than him; as he's dead and isn't aging anymore...It's just one of >> those things you don't expect, then one day.. it happens. Oops... sorry. My dad's about 86 now and increasingly dependent on me for things like basic shopping. >> the geek doesn't bother me as much as it did in school; intelligence has >> nice rewards, but at the same time it's a double edged sword. I had a >> sinking feeling when I was a kid messing around computers how things >> would be when I got older. And for the most part, things worked out as I >> expected them too. Very disappointing, but predictable. Computers were unheard of in school when I was a kid. It was only after some years of work that I got into them and never looked back. >> If you wound up with a family and the nice house and pickett fence and >> all that jazz then you beat the norm. Being a geek usually includes >> antisocialism; and for me, it will eventually be my undoing. heh, the >> irony of the whole situation is I more than likely will be directly >> responsible; perhaps on purpose even. > > I'm a bit of a geek... and even more unusual a female geek.. sort of LOL > ... try wrapping your mind around that bit of irony ... only I am better at > the creative stuff .. LOL I think the notion that geeks (or computer > people) have an antisocial bent is a misinterpretation of the reality that > most of us are independent, practical, creative, artistic people, and also > good at math.. Are you good at math?? :) Creative people don't have the > same need for alot of social acceptance... not that creative people don't > enjoy it ... we just don't depend on it like some other personality types > might. FWIW.. you don't seem antisocial to me at all.. just normal. LOL Well said, Jenn. I can stay at home for days at a time and be totally wrapped up in what I'm doing, computing-wise. Fortunately, I have a circle of friends and acquaintances at my local pub and make a point of going there for lunch a few times a week to keep in touch with the real world! >> So to sum it up, if getting older (60s, 70s) or however old you are, >> under present conditions does not appeal to me. > > Actually, the older a person gets, the more comfortable it gets being true > to ones self. You are 33? It gets better ....... :) That's very true. Overall, I'm much more content and settled than I was in my 30's.
From: Leonard Agoado on 6 Apr 2010 17:05 "Leythos" <spam999free(a)rrohio.com> wrote > Punch cards, both the 96 and the earlier version as well as having to > toggle instructions into the "computer" via switches and then > increment... We've come a long way since those days. Punch cards using FORTRAN with WatIV and WatV. Nothing like the feeling of a stack of cards clutched in your hand as the squeezed middle explodes and scatters upward on your way to the batch tray. Next two hours on a wide expanse of floor reordering them - "Here's 0001, now here's 0693, now 0428, oh yeah 0002 after 0001, here's 1867..." Regards, Len Agoado agoado(a)msn.com
From: Bullwinkle on 6 Apr 2010 17:21 Is that what you told your wife when you found out about the other men? "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:wsSdnW1_TeAo4CbWnZ2dnUVZ8k6dnZ2d(a)bt.com... I do not wish to argue about this. -- Dave
From: David H. Lipman on 6 Apr 2010 17:28
From: "Leonard Agoado" <agoado(a)msn.com> | "Leythos" <spam999free(a)rrohio.com> wrote >> Punch cards, both the 96 and the earlier version as well as having to >> toggle instructions into the "computer" via switches and then >> increment... We've come a long way since those days. | Punch cards using FORTRAN with WatIV and WatV. | Nothing like the feeling of a stack of cards clutched in your hand as | the squeezed middle explodes and scatters upward on your way to the | batch tray. Next two hours on a wide expanse of floor reordering them - | "Here's 0001, now here's 0693, now 0428, oh yeah 0002 after 0001, here's | 1867..." :-) -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp |