From: gufus on 5 Apr 2010 11:52 Hi ~BD~, Monday April 05 2010, ~BD~ writes to Dustin Cook: > XPost: alt.privacy.spyware, microsoft.public.security.virus > From: BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk > Your comments read and noted, Dustin. I dumped this thread! Boring .... gufus -- K Klement Enhance your marketing at http://www.gypsy-designs.com mailto:info(a)gypsy-designs.com Gypsy Designs Fax: (403) 242-3221 .... Don't stop at one bug.
From: David H. Lipman on 5 Apr 2010 18:08 From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> | David H. Lipman wrote: >> From: "FromTheRafters"<erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org> >> | "~BD~"<BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >> | news:v9adnYvt7piHOiTWnZ2dnUVZ7tudnZ2d(a)bt.com... >>>> I do not believe he/she is involved in Cybercrime in any way. /Those/ >>>> are the 'bad guys' in which I am interested. >> | Software piracy isn't cybercrime? >> Bindo !! >> IP theft of the Internet is indeed a "cybercrime". | It is exactly what TRT accused Malwarebytes of doing - and they did! NO. Malwarebytes never committed ANY crime. They blocked access to an IP and had signature detection for his plagiarized utility. Not a crime in any sense of the word. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: FromTheRafters on 5 Apr 2010 18:19 "Peter Foldes" <okf22(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:hpdafi$8p2$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > Since 1974 ? Hmmmm. I doubt it that you were programming at that time. > Have you used punch cards at all in your time at all ? if that what > you posted would be only be true. I've been computering since 1972. Programming in BASIC, FORTRAN, ALGOL, and COBOL. No IBM cards involved (did have paper tape though). I believe Ant has been doing this longer than I. I may claim an earlier date, but I believe he was "hands-on" where I was via teletype.
From: Peter Foldes on 5 Apr 2010 18:55 > Not "frustrating" then? Depends in what context. In your case Yes -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:TYqdnVFXO8zTxifWnZ2dnUVZ8tVi4p2d(a)bt.com... > Peter Foldes wrote: >> It is also unfortunate >> > > Not "frustrating" then?
From: ~BD~ on 5 Apr 2010 19:06
David H. Lipman wrote: To be clear: > They *blocked access* to an IP and had signature detection for his plagiarized utility. Not > a crime in any sense of the word. That, dear Sir, is a matter of opinion ...... IMO. |