From: FromTheRafters on 5 Apr 2010 20:40 "Heather" <fergie(a)canada.invalid> wrote in message news:hpdrvv$f4p$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > See......teaching ******* does have its intellectual points. And > because that fatuous idiot in Devon reads these groups, I will not > divulge what I taught that involved time and space. Have you ever taught anything that didn't?
From: David H. Lipman on 5 Apr 2010 20:49 From: "ASCII" <me2(a)privacy.net> | FromTheRafters wrote: >>"ASCII" <me2(a)privacy.net> wrote in message >>news:4bb9dfdb.992437(a)EDCBIC... >>> ~BD~ wrote: >>> <cut to the chase> >>>> but in reality is a link to a hostile website. >>> I still maintain that with a properly configured browser, >>> there's no such thing as a hostile website. >>> At least no more hostile than someone's carelessness permits. >>> I've even gone so far as to exhort folk for an example, >>> yet no one has arisen to that challenge. >>Indeed, many exploits were of browser extensions rather than the browser >>itself. I used to disallow scripting and would never have dreamed of >>having my browser automatically open acrobat reader. | Acrobat isn't even on board here, | all pdf's point to foxit. | (with the run/save option box always presented) >>IMO a 'properly >>configured browser' as you put it, would be more like that - that shuts >>off a major ingress vector right there. | The fact that it's not that hard to do has me amused when some folk seem to | tremble in fear of browsing and are constantly seeking more 'protection', even | to the point of causing scanner collisions and conflicting actions. | And something else while I'm here; | How do so many people get plagued by malware bearing trojans if they're all as | clean cut above board web surfers as the fantasy suggests? Could it be that | this group would wither away without all the warez trafficking behavior that | is so hypocritically chastised? http://www.us-cert.gov/current/index.html#foxit_reader_3_2_1 -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: Dustin Cook on 5 Apr 2010 21:03 "Ant" <not(a)home.today> wrote in news:i_adne5lTqB90SfWnZ2dnUVZ7qUAAAAA(a)brightview.co.uk: > "Dustin Cook" wrote: > >> "Ant" wrote: >>> I just found out that I'm older than Dustin Cook's dad. With regard >>> to computers, I've been operating/programming them since 1974. >> >> 4 years prior to my even existing. :) Not that it matters much. In 8 >> more years, I'll be older than my Dad. > > Is he going to be stuck in time? Hang on a minute, are you saying he > was only 8 or 9 years old when you were born? No. He passed away at age 40. I'm almost 33 now. So in 8 years, I will be older than him; as he's dead and isn't aging anymore...It's just one of those things you don't expect, then one day.. it happens. >> I don't think I ever tried to say I'd be doing this longer than you >> Ant. :) > > You never know, you may end up doing that - or does being an old geek > not appeal? the geek doesn't bother me as much as it did in school; intelligence has nice rewards, but at the same time it's a double edged sword. I had a sinking feeling when I was a kid messing around computers how things would be when I got older. And for the most part, things worked out as I expected them too. Very disappointing, but predictable. If you wound up with a family and the nice house and pickett fence and all that jazz then you beat the norm. Being a geek usually includes antisocialism; and for me, it will eventually be my undoing. heh, the irony of the whole situation is I more than likely will be directly responsible; perhaps on purpose even. So to sum it up, if getting older (60s, 70s) or however old you are, under present conditions does not appeal to me. -- "Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior
From: Dustin Cook on 5 Apr 2010 21:03 ~BD~ <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:YqGdncs-IZP7yyfWnZ2dnUVZ8kednZ2d(a)bt.com: > Ant wrote: >> "Dustin Cook" wrote: >> >>> "Ant" wrote: >>>> I just found out that I'm older than Dustin Cook's dad. With regard >>>> to computers, I've been operating/programming them since 1974. >>> >>> 4 years prior to my even existing. :) Not that it matters much. In 8 >>> more years, I'll be older than my Dad. >> >> Is he going to be stuck in time? Hang on a minute, are you saying he >> was only 8 or 9 years old when you were born? >> >>> I don't think I ever tried to say I'd be doing this longer than you >>> Ant. :) >> >> You never know, you may end up doing that - or does being an old geek >> not appeal? >> >> > > I may be wrong, but I think Dustin's dad died at an early age (40?). > > It's always sad to lose a loved one. Car accident.. yea... -- "Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior
From: Dustin Cook on 5 Apr 2010 21:04
~BD~ <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:YqGdnco- IZNfyyfWnZ2dnUVZ8kdi4p2d(a)bt.com: > David H. Lipman wrote: >> From: "FromTheRafters"<erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org> >> >> | "~BD~"<BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >> | news:v9adnYvt7piHOiTWnZ2dnUVZ7tudnZ2d(a)bt.com... >> >>>> I do not believe he/she is involved in Cybercrime in any way. /Those/ >>>> are the 'bad guys' in which I am interested. >> >> | Software piracy isn't cybercrime? >> >> >> Bindo !! >> >> IP theft of the Internet is indeed a "cybercrime". >> > > It is exactly what TRT accused Malwarebytes of doing - and they did! Excuse me? Please explain exactly what you mean by this... -- "Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior |