From: Hammy on
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:57:28 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
<zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>"Jim Thompson" <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote in
>message news:ucavr5hlkgrvich7dm596kvhn56riofd0f(a)4ax.com...
>> You mean none that you recognize.
>
>Right -- essentially the first BJT model you encounter in school.
>
>I realize that while this is a good enough model to design, I dunno, audio
>amplifiers or oscillators and maybe get a start on a 741, anyone doing
>BJT-based design today (at least for money :-) ) is using far more
>sophisticated models that do rely heavily on the actual device parameters.
>

I wouldnt waste your time. Transistors will be obsolete according to
HP. ;-)

I never heard of this (memristors)?

"Hewlett-Packard scientists on Thursday are to report advances in the
design of a new class of diminutive switches capable of replacing
transistors as computer chips shrink closer to the atomic scale. "

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/08/science/08chips.html

"The most advanced transistor technology today is based on minimum
feature sizes of 30 to 40 nanometers � by contrast a biological virus
is typically about 100 nanometers � and Dr. Williams said that H.P.
now has working 3-nanometer memristors that can switch on and off in
about a nanosecond, or a billionth of a second. "
From: Tim Williams on
"Hammy" <spam(a)spam.com> wrote in message
news:o6evr5t12h4qqat3cfmkeqm1abaem8slie(a)4ax.com...
> "The most advanced transistor technology today is based on minimum
> feature sizes of 30 to 40 nanometers � by contrast a biological virus
> is typically about 100 nanometers � and Dr. Williams said that H.P.
> now has working 3-nanometer memristors that can switch on and off in
> about a nanosecond, or a billionth of a second. "

Wow, that's slow. I have 2N3904s that avalanche faster than that!

'Course, they're referring to the memristance effect, which is fundamentally
different. When it comes to moving ions in a crystal, that's not too bad.

Heh...speaking of moving ions... wouldn't the gate threshold voltage
hysteresis of sodium impurities have a similar effect? But since it's on a
gate, it would be more of a transmemristance effect? :-) I wonder if a
couple sodium ions buried into a regular DRAM cell could have any useful
effect. (Note it's probably a good idea to deposit sodium only in the
active cells, and not the word line switches...)

Tim

--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms


From: Paul Keinanen on
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:25:45 +0100, John Devereux
<john(a)devereux.me.uk> wrote:

>"E" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> writes:
>
>> "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> kirjoitti
>> viestiss�:fmLvn.199280$rq1.66072(a)en-nntp-02.dc1.easynews.com...
>>> "E" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:hpnv2c$5it$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Distribution is a bit strange looking with two spikes
>>>
>>> Maybe two different batches of parts?
>>>
>>
>> Possibly, alltought they were all from same bag.
>> Or maybe just from different wafers?
>> How many BC337 fit one wafer? Probably quite many...
>>
>> -ek
>>
>>
>
>Perhaps they take all the middle ones for a tighter-spec version?

In Europe, traditionally a letter is appended at the end of the type
designator to signify the current gain group. If you specify just
"BC337", it is quite possible that transistors belonging to a specific
group may have been taken out.

In a similar way, if you order 5 or 10 % resistors/capacitors, there
might be deep dips in the distribution close to the nominal E12/E24
values, as these are selected out and sold as 1 % components.

From: Helmut Sennewald on
"E" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:hpnv2c$5it$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> Just measured hfe from some BC337-40 at about 5 mA collector current.
> Unfortunately nothing very interesting there
>
> Results:
> Sample size: 960 pcs
> minimum hfe: 388
> maximum hfe 513
> (datasheet limits are 250 and 630)
> avarage: 452
> avarage deviation: 27
> median: 463
> mode: 477
> Distribution is a bit strange looking with two spikes
> Histogram here: http://koti.mbnet.fi/hsahko/hfe/
>
> -ek

Hello ek,

Have you measured half of the transistors on the other day when the
room temperature was a few degrees different?
Current gain of transistors heavily depends on temperature.

Best regards,
Helmut


From: E on

"Helmut Sennewald" <helmutsennewald(a)t-online.de> kirjoitti
viestiss�:hppqkr$hm6$03$1(a)news.t-online.com...
> "E" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:hpnv2c$5it$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> Just measured hfe from some BC337-40 at about 5 mA collector current.
>> Unfortunately nothing very interesting there
>>
>> Results:
>> Sample size: 960 pcs
>> minimum hfe: 388
>> maximum hfe 513
>> (datasheet limits are 250 and 630)
>> avarage: 452
>> avarage deviation: 27
>> median: 463
>> mode: 477
>> Distribution is a bit strange looking with two spikes
>> Histogram here: http://koti.mbnet.fi/hsahko/hfe/
>>
>> -ek
>
> Hello ek,
>
> Have you measured half of the transistors on the other day when the
> room temperature was a few degrees different?
> Current gain of transistors heavily depends on temperature.
>
> Best regards,
> Helmut
>
>

No, they are all measured within three hours.
I just looked at the data file in 250 pcs slices and
distribution looks about same in each slice.

-ek