From: Rowland McDonnell on
Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > That's the bottom of the wardrobe, right? Where the deep drifts of
> > designer handbags conceal strata of hundreds of pairs of once-worn
> > shoes, yes?
> >
> > I'm sure all of us have wives like that, even Sara.
>
> Nope. I don't. Mine's rather more tech-oriented. I'm fairly sure she doesn't
> possess even a single handbag. Shoes she buys once in a blue moon and only
> if she's going to wear them significantly more than just once.

My other half rides a motorcycle and wears a pair of these to do so:
<http://www.altberg.co.uk/Web/motorcycle_ClubClas.jsp> (me too, just
bigger).

She has precisely no designer handbags, nor any shoes worn merely once.

Sarcasm and irony are writing styles that I employ from time to time.

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: James Jolley on
On 2010-06-16 18:31:31 +0100,
real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid (Rowland McDonnell) said:

> D.M. Procida <real-not-anti-spam-address(a)apple-juice.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sure all of us have wives like that, even Sara.
>>
>> I doubt that even the married people here have more than one wife. And I
>> don't believe Sara has any at all.
>
> Even you have lost your sense of irony?
>
> Is it the weather?
>
> Rowland.

No, it's just him. He's like a bloody microprocessor, lives on logic
then uses it against you to irritate.

From: Jim on
Bruce Horrocks <07.013(a)scorecrow.com> wrote:

> > Nope. I don't. Mine's rather more tech-oriented. I'm fairly sure she doesn't
> > possess even a single handbag. Shoes she buys once in a blue moon and only
> > if she's going to wear them significantly more than just once.
>
> Why would she want a handbag when your sporran is always at the ready? ;-)

Well, quite!

Jim
--
"Microsoft admitted its Vista operating system was a 'less good
product' in what IT experts have described as the most ambitious
understatement since the captain of the Titanic reported some
slightly damp tablecloths." http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
From: Ian McCall on
On 2010-06-16 15:48:56 +0100, James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> said:

> On 2010-06-16 15:05:51 +0100, Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> said:
>
>> On 2010-06-16, Rowland McDonnell
>> <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> That's the bottom of the wardrobe, right? Where the deep drifts of
>>> designer handbags conceal strata of hundreds of pairs of once-worn
>>> shoes, yes?
>>>
>>> I'm sure all of us have wives like that, even Sara.
>>
>> Nope. I don't. Mine's rather more tech-oriented. I'm fairly sure she doesn't
>> possess even a single handbag. Shoes she buys once in a blue moon and only
>> if she's going to wear them significantly more than just once.
>>
>> Jim
>
> My partner's quite into tech also, loves her games, fun, TV and all the
> rest of it. Bit like me, except I love other gadgets, robots, that sort
> of idiocy.

Caz once ordered me out of the house and told me not to come back
without a Gamecube, four controllers and a copy of Super Monkeyball -
this was pretty much on launch week. She also wrote appreciation email
to the president of iRobot over the Roomba/Scooba combination.

Shoes? She's heard of them. Purses are not by whatever
Italian-of-the-week you're supposed to buy from today, but by Studio
Ghibli (as, indeed, are the films). Her opinion of Windows makes me
look like Balmer's right-hand man. She is the Right Girl(tm). (well, we
will skip over the sad predilection for TV trash anyway...)

Cheers,
Ian

From: Sara Merriman on
In article <slrni1hmhv.2btg.jim(a)wotan.magrathea.local>,
Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2010-06-16, Rowland McDonnell
> <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > That's the bottom of the wardrobe, right? Where the deep drifts of
> > designer handbags conceal strata of hundreds of pairs of once-worn
> > shoes, yes?
> >
> > I'm sure all of us have wives like that, even Sara.
>
> Nope. I don't. Mine's rather more tech-oriented. I'm fairly sure she doesn't
> possess even a single handbag. Shoes she buys once in a blue moon and only
> if she's going to wear them significantly more than just once.
>
I don't have a wife like that either ;-) although Rog actually has more
shoes than I do.

My excuse for a handbag is actually a fabric shopping bag that an ex's
mum made for me. Mind you, I probably would have more shoes/bags if it
wasn't so bloody difficult to buy vegetarian ones. Just as well really.

--
Sara

Cuddler of rats, cats and husband