From: Rowland McDonnell on 16 Jun 2010 13:35 Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > > > > That's the bottom of the wardrobe, right? Where the deep drifts of > > designer handbags conceal strata of hundreds of pairs of once-worn > > shoes, yes? > > > > I'm sure all of us have wives like that, even Sara. > > Nope. I don't. Mine's rather more tech-oriented. I'm fairly sure she doesn't > possess even a single handbag. Shoes she buys once in a blue moon and only > if she's going to wear them significantly more than just once. My other half rides a motorcycle and wears a pair of these to do so: <http://www.altberg.co.uk/Web/motorcycle_ClubClas.jsp> (me too, just bigger). She has precisely no designer handbags, nor any shoes worn merely once. Sarcasm and irony are writing styles that I employ from time to time. Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: James Jolley on 16 Jun 2010 13:53 On 2010-06-16 18:31:31 +0100, real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid (Rowland McDonnell) said: > D.M. Procida <real-not-anti-spam-address(a)apple-juice.co.uk> wrote: > >> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: >> >>> I'm sure all of us have wives like that, even Sara. >> >> I doubt that even the married people here have more than one wife. And I >> don't believe Sara has any at all. > > Even you have lost your sense of irony? > > Is it the weather? > > Rowland. No, it's just him. He's like a bloody microprocessor, lives on logic then uses it against you to irritate.
From: Jim on 16 Jun 2010 14:00 Bruce Horrocks <07.013(a)scorecrow.com> wrote: > > Nope. I don't. Mine's rather more tech-oriented. I'm fairly sure she doesn't > > possess even a single handbag. Shoes she buys once in a blue moon and only > > if she's going to wear them significantly more than just once. > > Why would she want a handbag when your sporran is always at the ready? ;-) Well, quite! Jim -- "Microsoft admitted its Vista operating system was a 'less good product' in what IT experts have described as the most ambitious understatement since the captain of the Titanic reported some slightly damp tablecloths." http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
From: Ian McCall on 16 Jun 2010 15:32 On 2010-06-16 15:48:56 +0100, James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> said: > On 2010-06-16 15:05:51 +0100, Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> said: > >> On 2010-06-16, Rowland McDonnell >> <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> That's the bottom of the wardrobe, right? Where the deep drifts of >>> designer handbags conceal strata of hundreds of pairs of once-worn >>> shoes, yes? >>> >>> I'm sure all of us have wives like that, even Sara. >> >> Nope. I don't. Mine's rather more tech-oriented. I'm fairly sure she doesn't >> possess even a single handbag. Shoes she buys once in a blue moon and only >> if she's going to wear them significantly more than just once. >> >> Jim > > My partner's quite into tech also, loves her games, fun, TV and all the > rest of it. Bit like me, except I love other gadgets, robots, that sort > of idiocy. Caz once ordered me out of the house and told me not to come back without a Gamecube, four controllers and a copy of Super Monkeyball - this was pretty much on launch week. She also wrote appreciation email to the president of iRobot over the Roomba/Scooba combination. Shoes? She's heard of them. Purses are not by whatever Italian-of-the-week you're supposed to buy from today, but by Studio Ghibli (as, indeed, are the films). Her opinion of Windows makes me look like Balmer's right-hand man. She is the Right Girl(tm). (well, we will skip over the sad predilection for TV trash anyway...) Cheers, Ian
From: Sara Merriman on 16 Jun 2010 15:33
In article <slrni1hmhv.2btg.jim(a)wotan.magrathea.local>, Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > On 2010-06-16, Rowland McDonnell > <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > > > > That's the bottom of the wardrobe, right? Where the deep drifts of > > designer handbags conceal strata of hundreds of pairs of once-worn > > shoes, yes? > > > > I'm sure all of us have wives like that, even Sara. > > Nope. I don't. Mine's rather more tech-oriented. I'm fairly sure she doesn't > possess even a single handbag. Shoes she buys once in a blue moon and only > if she's going to wear them significantly more than just once. > I don't have a wife like that either ;-) although Rog actually has more shoes than I do. My excuse for a handbag is actually a fabric shopping bag that an ex's mum made for me. Mind you, I probably would have more shoes/bags if it wasn't so bloody difficult to buy vegetarian ones. Just as well really. -- Sara Cuddler of rats, cats and husband |