From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 00:44 "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > > "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message > news:Xns9D9DDE18D3661JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... >> Gilford Brimly <gilfordbrimly(a)spamless.com> wrote : >> >> >>> So let's see... you are so insecure and afraid that you wish everyone >>> had their own personal cop to protect them 24 hours a day. >> >> Isnt that called a police state? >> >> In a free society, we can all be armed for our own defense. >> >> I didn't realize he was in Canada though, a country that can arrest and >> try >> you if you say something that someone else "feels hurt" by. >> >> >> >> -- >> - Jane Galt > > With freedom goes responsibility... > Take Care, > Dudley Sounds like your country allows neither. -- - Jane Galt
From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 00:48 "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > > "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message > news:Xns9D9DDEE835DB7JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... >> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : >> >>> >>> I've nothing against self-defence, have gotten into more than a few >>> scraps myself takin' care of business... Even had to go one on three >>> with a few cops one night when they "exceeded their authority." >>> >>> But, my concern with the general public carrying weapons is that it >>> merely escalates the likelihood of innocents getting hurt. >> >> Actually quite the opposite. More guns, less crime. >> >> http://www.gunownersalliance.com/hupp-10.htm >> >> >> >> -- >> - Jane Galt > > Not really, current stats are based on a low percentage of gun owners to > general population. > > As guns become more prevalent, criminals become more cautious, up until > they reach a point where the criminal element knows there's going to be > armed resistance, so they take precautions and get more organized. > > Statistics from the old "wild west" would be more appropriate to a > modern civilization where concealed carry weapons are common place. The old wild west was safer than modern day London. All that you posted above is thoroughly debunked marxist propaganda, aimed at disarming and dissolving the United States. "All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all guns, that way no guns can ever be used to command the party." -- Mao Tse Tung "Selected Works of Mao Zedong," 1965 yet: Only an armed people can be the real bulwark of popular liberty. � Vladimir Lenin -- - Jane Galt
From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 00:49 tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote : > On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:00:50 -0500, Jane Galt <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> > wrote: > >>Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote : >> >> >>> Anybody using Beck as a rational source of information is on shakey >>> ground. >> >>So many people bash, lie and smear about him without ever having watched a >>single program. > > True. The more rational among us can make our determination about him > after watching only a small portion of one of his programs. There's > no need to watch an entire program. > > It's rather like spoiled meat. You don't have to eat the entire > sandwich to know. > > > You base your opinions by what you're fed from the likes of Huffington Post and Moveon.org, George Soros' puppeteers. -- - Jane Galt
From: Dudley Hanks on 21 Jun 2010 00:50 "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message news:Xns9D9DE758FB2BJaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... > "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > >> Stupid? >> >> You think walking around with a gun in your purse will help you if the >> perps know you've got it? > > False premise. No one knows what I got. > >> >> Don't want to burst your bubble, but think about it... > > Oh I have, apparently much more than you, servile. > > > -- > - Jane Galt And, you actually think you can open your purse, drag it out and get into firing position before a well-prepared thug rips your bag from your shoulder and renders you immobile? Must be nice to be so blissfully optomistic ... Take Care, Dudley
From: Dudley Hanks on 21 Jun 2010 00:56
"Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message news:Xns9D9DE769DD65BJaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... > "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > >> >> "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message >> news:Xns9D9DDE18D3661JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... >>> Gilford Brimly <gilfordbrimly(a)spamless.com> wrote : >>> >>> >>>> So let's see... you are so insecure and afraid that you wish everyone >>>> had their own personal cop to protect them 24 hours a day. >>> >>> Isnt that called a police state? >>> >>> In a free society, we can all be armed for our own defense. >>> >>> I didn't realize he was in Canada though, a country that can arrest and >>> try >>> you if you say something that someone else "feels hurt" by. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> - Jane Galt >> >> With freedom goes responsibility... >> Take Care, >> Dudley > > Sounds like your country allows neither. > > > > -- > - Jane Galt Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law: Rights and freedoms in Canada 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. Take Care, Dudley |