Best Coolpix for HD and low light too?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 14:56 "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > > "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message > news:Xns9D9E777CEF27JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... >> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : >> >> >>> I put more stock in the rule of law, as composed by a democratic >>> legislature / committee, than I do in the rule of law as composed by a >>> lunatic neighbour with a handgun... >> >> And what if your mob ( legislature ) votes to seize everything you own >> and send you to a re-education camp? >> >> I know, serviles like you always trust your governments, up until they >> toss >> you into cattle cars, but keep in mind that the British just finally >> apologized for the thuggery of Bloody Sunday, which was, oh, way back >> in ancient history - 1972. >> >> >> -- >> - Jane Galt > > And, if you'd been around in Germany with a pistol in your pants, you'd > have held off the SS for how long? > Oh that's right, Mr. Defeatist. I may as well have just given up. Why try to take some of them with me, like the Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto did? Why they should have just given up too. If they'd had a simpering wimp like you with them, they likely would have slit your throat to stop your whining, so they could save their precious bullets for the Nazis. -- - Jane Galt
From: Dudley Hanks on 21 Jun 2010 14:56 "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message news:Xns9D9E79DC1A483JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... > Well I guess the camera thread here is officially over, co-opted by smears > from the far left loons. > > > -- > - Jane Galt Well, I guess I was wrong. I thought there was at least one member on the group who wouldn't resort to name calling when the going got tough... Too bad... I guess, if you can't baffle 'em with bullshit, run and hide, and pick 'em off with a sniper scope... Take Care, Dudley
From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 14:57 "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > > In groups, the sane ones have a chance to counter-balance the crazies... Read "People Of The Lie" sometime. It's called group evil, where people can do things that they'd never have the nerve to do by themselves. Ask my dead ancestors in Poland. -- - Jane Galt
From: Dudley Hanks on 21 Jun 2010 15:01 "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message news:Xns9D9E7AD637DB2JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... > "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > >> >> Thank you for providing such a colourful illustration that concealed >> carries are not necessary, even in the most dire of circumstances... ;) >> > > You still fail to grasp the concept of a Bill of Rights. People like you > should be sent to gulags, and probably will be someday, if your mob rule > reaches its inevitable conclusion. > > > -- > - Jane Galt I have no problem with a bill of rights, but I do care what rights are contained in it, how they are interpreted, and the ramifications of bad judgement... The funny thing is that you don't realize one of your Libertarian buddies might just be YOUR worst enemy, much more likely than a proponent of democracy... Take Care, Dudley
From: tony cooper on 21 Jun 2010 15:03
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:00:42 -0500, Jane Galt <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote: >tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote : > > >>>The marxist snobs, who smear anyone as "stupid" who doesnt agree with >>>their tyrannical politiks. >> >> The nutters who smear anyone as "marxist" who doesn't agree with their >> extremist positions, Beck manufactured conspiracies, Limbaugh lunacy, >> and Hannity hysteria. > >If the shoe fits, comrade. What exactly do you think grandiose >redistribution of wealth schemes are? > Excessive quoting indicates a person who is unable to form their own opinions. They rely on copy/pasting the thoughts of others because they don't have the capacity to form and elucidate their own thoughts. They are easily-led shallow thinkers because having a base of macros allows them to present themselves as informed, but - in reality - rely on other people to lead them to a quote base to provide what they can't articulate themselves. The bigger the macro base of quotes they have on tap, the more important and wise they think they are. They've become parrots with ability to key up Control C/Control V and are thus relieved of actual rational and objective analysis. >"From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs." >- Karl Marx > >People are in need! Give them endless unemployment, welfare, take from >those dirty rich and give it to the middle class and poor. > >From The London Chronicle, November 29, 1766: >"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. -- >I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in >poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I travelled >much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public >provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, >and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for >them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer. There is no >country in the world where so many provisions are established for them; so >many hospitals to receive them when they are sick or lame, founded and >maintained by voluntary charities; so many alms-houses for the aged of both >sexes, together with a solemn general law made by the rich to subject their >estates to a heavy tax for the support of the poor. Under all these >obligations, are our poor modest, humble, and thankful; and do they use >their best endeavours to maintain themselves, and lighten our shoulders of >this burthen? -- On the contrary, I affirm that there is no country in the >world in which the poor are more idle, dissolute, drunken, and insolent. >The day you passed that act, you took away from before their eyes the >greatest of all inducements to industry, frugality, and sobriety, by giving >them a dependance on somewhat else than a careful accumulation during youth >and health, for support in age or sickness. In short, you offered a premium >for the encouragement of idleness, and you should not now wonder that it >has had its effect in the increase of poverty. Repeal that law, and you >will soon see a change in their manners. St. Monday, and St. Tuesday, will >cease to be holidays. SIX days shalt thou labour, though one of the old >commandments long treated as out of date, will again be looked upon as a >respectable precept; industry will increase, and with it plenty among the >lower people; their circumstances will mend, and more will be done for >their happiness by inuring them to provide for themselves, than could be >done by dividing all your estates among them." - Benjamin Franklin, "On the >Price of Corn, and Management of the Poor" -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |