Prev: product of tangents problem
Next: zeta zero
From: Dave on 22 Sep 2009 15:26 On Sep 22, 2:33 am, "M.MichaelMusatov" <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Black holes are visual effects. They do not physically exist as if you > were to approach one it would be the same as a heat mirage that looks > like water. The 'black hole' would give way to par equal visual space > and stars would be visual past and through it (or where it is seen to > have been by the human brain). You see much like microwaves there is a > lot to the world and the universe that is invisible we can explain but > we stumble over to absurdity trying to explain what we see but cannot > comprehend. > M.Michael Musatov Actually, they only appear to be visual effects. Dave
From: adamk on 22 Sep 2009 12:00 Imbecil musafuck wrote, after wiping another line of cocaine from his nose: > Black hos are visual effects. I don't think their pimps believe that. They do not > exist Nor does any intelligence nor talent on your part. as if you > >> we stumble over to absurdity everytime we read any of your posts. trying to explain what > we see but cannot > comprehend. To you, that is basically everything, right?. > M.Michael Musatov Loser.
From: dlzc on 22 Sep 2009 16:44 Followup set to more apporpriate group. On Sep 22, 12:33 am, "M.MichaelMusatov" <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Black holes are visual effects. Anything we measure are "visual effects", since somehow light is involved. > They do not physically exist .... neglecting the extensive evidence accumulating showing a lack of surface interactions. > as if you were to approach one it would > be the same as a heat mirage that looks > like water. No surface interactions, even though stuff is falling in. > The 'black hole' would give way to par > equal visual space and stars would be > visual past and through it (or where it > is seen to have been by the human brain). When you grow said brain... > You see much like microwaves there is a > lot to the world and the universe that > is invisible we can explain but we > stumble over to absurdity .... like what you post here? > trying to explain what we see but cannot > comprehend. Should anyone actually be interested in visualizations related to the black holes that MMM cannot accept on religious grounds: http://jilawww.colorado.edu/~pja/black_hole.html http://ccrg.rit.edu/movies/visualization David A. Smith
From: xxein on 22 Sep 2009 19:25 On Sep 22, 3:33 am, "M.MichaelMusatov" <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Black holes are visual effects. They do not physically exist as if you > were to approach one it would be the same as a heat mirage that looks > like water. The 'black hole' would give way to par equal visual space > and stars would be visual past and through it (or where it is seen to > have been by the human brain). You see much like microwaves there is a > lot to the world and the universe that is invisible we can explain but > we stumble over to absurdity trying to explain what we see but cannot > comprehend. > M.Michael Musatov xxein: Explain that again. This time, use the part of your brain that is still physically attached. Not the part in your penis either.
From: Michael on 22 Sep 2009 19:38
On Sep 22, 4:25 pm, xxein <xx...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Sep 22, 3:33 am, "M.MichaelMusatov" <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Black holes are visual effects. They do not physically exist as if you > > were to approach one it would be the same as a heat mirage that looks > > like water. The 'black hole' would give way to par equal visual space > > and stars would be visual past and through it (or where it is seen to > > have been by the human brain). You see much like microwaves there is a > > lot to the world and the universe that is invisible we can explain but > > we stumble over to absurdity trying to explain what we see but cannot > > comprehend. > > M.Michael Musatov > -xxein:== - that is > xxein: Explain that again. This time, use the part of your brain > that is still physically attached. Not the part in your penis either. |