From: Dave on
On Sep 22, 2:33 am, "M.MichaelMusatov" <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Black holes are visual effects. They do not physically exist as if you
> were to approach one it would be the same as a heat mirage that looks
> like water. The 'black hole' would give way to par equal visual space
> and stars would be visual past and through it (or where it is seen to
> have been by the human brain). You see much like microwaves there is a
> lot to the world and the universe that is invisible we can explain but
> we stumble over to absurdity trying to explain what we see but cannot
> comprehend.
> M.Michael Musatov

Actually, they only appear to be visual effects.

Dave
From: adamk on
Imbecil musafuck wrote, after wiping another line of cocaine from his nose:

> Black hos are visual effects.

I don't think their pimps believe that.

They do not
> exist

Nor does any intelligence nor talent on your part.

as if you
>
>> we stumble over to absurdity

everytime we read any of your posts.

trying to explain what
> we see but cannot
> comprehend.

To you, that is basically everything, right?.

> M.Michael Musatov

Loser.
From: dlzc on
Followup set to more apporpriate group.

On Sep 22, 12:33 am, "M.MichaelMusatov" <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Black holes are visual effects.

Anything we measure are "visual effects", since somehow light is
involved.

> They do not physically exist

.... neglecting the extensive evidence accumulating showing a lack of
surface interactions.

> as if you were to approach one it would
> be the same as a heat mirage that looks
> like water.

No surface interactions, even though stuff is falling in.

> The 'black hole' would give way to par
> equal visual space and stars would be
> visual past and through it (or where it
> is seen to have been by the human brain).

When you grow said brain...

> You see much like microwaves there is a
> lot to the world and the universe that
> is invisible we can explain but we
> stumble over to absurdity

.... like what you post here?

> trying to explain what we see but cannot
> comprehend.

Should anyone actually be interested in visualizations related to the
black holes that MMM cannot accept on religious grounds:
http://jilawww.colorado.edu/~pja/black_hole.html
http://ccrg.rit.edu/movies/visualization

David A. Smith
From: xxein on
On Sep 22, 3:33 am, "M.MichaelMusatov" <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Black holes are visual effects. They do not physically exist as if you
> were to approach one it would be the same as a heat mirage that looks
> like water. The 'black hole' would give way to par equal visual space
> and stars would be visual past and through it (or where it is seen to
> have been by the human brain). You see much like microwaves there is a
> lot to the world and the universe that is invisible we can explain but
> we stumble over to absurdity trying to explain what we see but cannot
> comprehend.
> M.Michael Musatov

xxein: Explain that again. This time, use the part of your brain
that is still physically attached. Not the part in your penis either.
From: Michael on
On Sep 22, 4:25 pm, xxein <xx...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> On Sep 22, 3:33 am, "M.MichaelMusatov" <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Black holes are visual effects. They do not physically exist as if you
> > were to approach one it would be the same as a heat mirage that looks
> > like water. The 'black hole' would give way to par equal visual space
> > and stars would be visual past and through it (or where it is seen to
> > have been by the human brain). You see much like microwaves there is a
> > lot to the world and the universe that is invisible we can explain but
> > we stumble over to absurdity trying to explain what we see but cannot
> > comprehend.
> > M.Michael Musatov
>

-xxein:==
- that is
> xxein:  Explain that again.  This time, use the part of your brain
> that is still physically attached.  Not the part in your penis either.

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prev: product of tangents problem
Next: zeta zero