Black holes violate laws
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 397.7: Austria and Hungary Relate Fibonacci Sequence to Probable Causation/Influence (PI) form via 3 term Arithmetic Progressions
Next: Salt on Venus
From: BURT on 2 Jun 2010 16:13 On Jun 2, 1:05 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 6/2/2010 1:59 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 2, 1:48 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 2, 4:23 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>> On 6/1/2010 11:10 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>> On Jun 1, 8:51 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >>>>> On 6/1/2010 10:39 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>>> On Jun 1, 8:08 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> On 6/1/2010 6:26 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>>>>> You mean bert not me. > > >>>>>>> You're both similarly nuts. > > >>>>>> I think you have a need to get back at me. > > >>>>> That presumes that what you think matters to me. It > >>>>> doesn't. > > >>>>>> Black holes violate laws. > > >>>>> So do you. > > >>>> Stop following me around unless you have something to say to me. > > >>> I've said it before and I'll say it again, you're crazy. And to > >>> think anyone would "follow you around" helps exemplify it. > > >>>> We are not seeing black holes but the extreme of red shift in a > >>>> limited strength gravity. > > >>> You have yet to define "limited strength gravity." You have yet to > >>> define "black hole." In fact, you have yet to define anything > >>> at all. You only blather in generalities and then tell us > >>> what a genius you are.- Hide quoted text - > > >>> - Show quoted text - > > >> Yes I am a genius. There are only a few. I have been recognised by > >> John Nash as a genius personally. > > > But John Nash was nutso himself. > > The last person who told me he was a genius was 40something, living > with and off his parents who had to tell him to brush his teeth and > to take a shower. Between those events with his parents he achieved > nothing. > > The measure of a genius is achievement. Neither that 40something > guy, nor you, achieved anything so the genius label doesn't belong > to either of you. > > Did you remember to brush your teeth? What was the last time you > had a bath or shower? Any time in the past 3 months? > > Do you have any teeth?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Everything that Stephen Hawking supposedly did will be seen as bunk physics. He is only someone because the world made him. He is an inferior genius that doesn't need God and people worship him because he is their God. If I am not a genius then show me where I am wrong or will you babbler on? Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 2 Jun 2010 16:21 On 6/2/2010 3:13 PM, BURT wrote: > On Jun 2, 1:05 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 6/2/2010 1:59 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jun 2, 1:48 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> On Jun 2, 4:23 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> >>>>> On 6/1/2010 11:10 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>>> On Jun 1, 8:51 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/1/2010 10:39 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>>>>> On Jun 1, 8:08 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/1/2010 6:26 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> You mean bert not me. >> >>>>>>>>> You're both similarly nuts. >> >>>>>>>> I think you have a need to get back at me. >> >>>>>>> That presumes that what you think matters to me. It >>>>>>> doesn't. >> >>>>>>>> Black holes violate laws. >> >>>>>>> So do you. >> >>>>>> Stop following me around unless you have something to say to me. >> >>>>> I've said it before and I'll say it again, you're crazy. And to >>>>> think anyone would "follow you around" helps exemplify it. >> >>>>>> We are not seeing black holes but the extreme of red shift in a >>>>>> limited strength gravity. >> >>>>> You have yet to define "limited strength gravity." You have yet to >>>>> define "black hole." In fact, you have yet to define anything >>>>> at all. You only blather in generalities and then tell us >>>>> what a genius you are.- Hide quoted text - >> >>>>> - Show quoted text - >> >>>> Yes I am a genius. There are only a few. I have been recognised by >>>> John Nash as a genius personally. >> >>> But John Nash was nutso himself. >> >> The last person who told me he was a genius was 40something, living >> with and off his parents who had to tell him to brush his teeth and >> to take a shower. Between those events with his parents he achieved >> nothing. >> >> The measure of a genius is achievement. Neither that 40something >> guy, nor you, achieved anything so the genius label doesn't belong >> to either of you. >> >> Did you remember to brush your teeth? What was the last time you >> had a bath or shower? Any time in the past 3 months? >> >> Do you have any teeth?- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Everything that Stephen Hawking supposedly did will be seen as bunk > physics. He is only someone because the world made him. He is an > inferior genius that doesn't need God and people worship him because > he is their God. > > If I am not a genius then show me where I am wrong or will you babbler > on? I'm still looking for something you've written that's right. I can't find anything that's right, so where do I start? Show me any achievement of yours that you think is right. Lets start from there.
From: BURT on 2 Jun 2010 16:28 On Jun 2, 1:12 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 6/2/2010 2:15 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 2, 11:59 am, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 2, 1:48 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>> On Jun 2, 4:23 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>>> On 6/1/2010 11:10 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>> On Jun 1, 8:51 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On 6/1/2010 10:39 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Jun 1, 8:08 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 6/1/2010 6:26 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> You mean bert not me. > > >>>>>>>> You're both similarly nuts. > > >>>>>>> I think you have a need to get back at me. > > >>>>>> That presumes that what you think matters to me. It > >>>>>> doesn't. > > >>>>>>> Black holes violate laws. > > >>>>>> So do you. > > >>>>> Stop following me around unless you have something to say to me. > > >>>> I've said it before and I'll say it again, you're crazy. And to > >>>> think anyone would "follow you around" helps exemplify it. > > >>>>> We are not seeing black holes but the extreme of red shift in a > >>>>> limited strength gravity. > > >>>> You have yet to define "limited strength gravity." You have yet to > >>>> define "black hole." In fact, you have yet to define anything > >>>> at all. You only blather in generalities and then tell us > >>>> what a genius you are.- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text - > > >>> Yes I am a genius. There are only a few. I have been recognised by > >>> John Nash as a genius personally. > > >> But John Nash was nutso himself.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > The point is he is a genius recognising me as a genius. He told me so > > after seeing some of my work in 2006. > > According to the IP address that you're posting from, you're in > Tuscon, Arizona. John Nash is in Princeton, New Jersey. Tell > us how it was that he saw your work and told you you're a genius? > John is heavily supervised in his daily activities. Is it possible > the two of you were roomies at a mental hospital? > > > I am not afraid to say I am a genius and I have been validated by > > others. > > - Show quoted text - I don't need to spill out the private details of my life. As far as I am concerned you can wait to find out who I am. Go ahead doubt me now because you're not going to be able to later. Yes this must be crazy. But I am willing to wait. Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 2 Jun 2010 18:11 On 6/2/2010 3:28 PM, BURT wrote: > On Jun 2, 1:12 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> According to the IP address that you're posting from, you're in >> Tuscon, Arizona. John Nash is in Princeton, New Jersey. Tell >> us how it was that he saw your work and told you you're a genius? >> John is heavily supervised in his daily activities. Is it possible >> the two of you were roomies at a mental hospital? > I don't need to spill out the private details of my life. > As far as I am concerned you can wait to find out who I am. > Go ahead doubt me now because you're not going to be able to later. > Yes this must be crazy. But I am willing to wait. > Mitch Raemsch There's no question about doubt, you've given no reason for anything else. When you proclaim yourself a genius you're making yourself either a public figure or, as in your case, a public spectacle. A public figure can have no private details about their life. A public spectacle usually does.
From: purple on 3 Jun 2010 07:26
On 6/3/2010 1:09 AM, J. Clarke wrote: > In other words you insist on going off on irrelevancies. Equating IQ with genius is irrelevant. > Bored now. Yes indeed, you sure have been. |