Prev: Quantum Gravity 397.7: Austria and Hungary Relate Fibonacci Sequence to Probable Causation/Influence (PI) form via 3 term Arithmetic Progressions
Next: Salt on Venus
From: BURT on 30 May 2010 21:57 First the event horizon accelerates matter at light speed. This is GR violating the motion laws set forth by SR. Second. The energy laws for light are also broken at the event horizon. The blueshift of incomming light will violate energy laws by going infinite. And the redshift for outgoing light makes its energy infinitely small. Black holes don't exist. And what we are seeing is a maximum red shift by what is short of a black hole. Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 30 May 2010 23:05 On 5/30/2010 8:57 PM, BURT wrote: > First the event horizon accelerates matter at light speed. This is GR > violating the motion laws set forth by SR. > > Second. The energy laws for light are also broken at the event > horizon. The blueshift of incomming light will violate energy laws by > going infinite. And the redshift for outgoing light makes its energy > infinitely small. > > Black holes don't exist. And what we are seeing is a maximum red shift > by what is short of a black hole. > > Mitch Raemsch Idiot.
From: BURT on 30 May 2010 23:09 On May 30, 8:05 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/30/2010 8:57 PM, BURT wrote: > > > First the event horizon accelerates matter at light speed. This is GR > > violating the motion laws set forth by SR. > > > Second. The energy laws for light are also broken at the event > > horizon. The blueshift of incomming light will violate energy laws by > > going infinite. And the redshift for outgoing light makes its energy > > infinitely small. > > > Black holes don't exist. And what we are seeing is a maximum red shift > > by what is short of a black hole. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Idiot. Perhaps you can correct me for pointing out the laws violated? Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 31 May 2010 00:21 On 5/30/2010 10:09 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 30, 8:05 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 5/30/2010 8:57 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>> First the event horizon accelerates matter at light speed. This is GR >>> violating the motion laws set forth by SR. >> >>> Second. The energy laws for light are also broken at the event >>> horizon. The blueshift of incomming light will violate energy laws by >>> going infinite. And the redshift for outgoing light makes its energy >>> infinitely small. >> >>> Black holes don't exist. And what we are seeing is a maximum red shift >>> by what is short of a black hole. >> >>> Mitch Raemsch >> >> Idiot. > > Perhaps you can correct me for pointing out the laws violated? Not a single thing you wrote was correct, beginning with the fact that the event horizon is a location with no properties to create acceleration. Before you get to blue shift, tell me about the difference in the internal and external dimensions of a theoretical black hole.
From: BURT on 31 May 2010 00:32
On May 30, 9:21 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/30/2010 10:09 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On May 30, 8:05 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 5/30/2010 8:57 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>> First the event horizon accelerates matter at light speed. This is GR > >>> violating the motion laws set forth by SR. > > >>> Second. The energy laws for light are also broken at the event > >>> horizon. The blueshift of incomming light will violate energy laws by > >>> going infinite. And the redshift for outgoing light makes its energy > >>> infinitely small. > > >>> Black holes don't exist. And what we are seeing is a maximum red shift > >>> by what is short of a black hole. > > >>> Mitch Raemsch > > >> Idiot. > > > Perhaps you can correct me for pointing out the laws violated? > > Not a single thing you wrote was correct, Nothing you know is correct. Absolutely everything in physics is to be corrected in the future. Black holes don't even exist. > beginning with the fact > that the event horizon is a location with no properties to create > acceleration. OH really? Please prove then that there is no gravity at an event horizon to accelerate energy. You can't do it. > > Before you get to blue shift, tell me about the difference > in the internal and external dimensions of a theoretical > black hole.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Blueshift comes first. This is another law broken at the event horizon. You see black hole theory predicts its own downfall just like Stephen Hawking said. Mitch Raemsch |