From: Rowland McDonnell on
SteveH <italiancar(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
> > <http://www.ursaminorbeta.co.uk/VCF2010/index.html>
> >
> > Not great pictures, but a very enjoyable day out. Still on tomorrow if
> > anyone's insterested.
>
> Wow.
>
> Dragon 'Professional'.
>
> Want.
>
> Really badly want.

Any particular reason?

<http://www.dragonwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=GEC_Dragon>

Given that GEC Dragon seems to have operated between about February and
November 1984 only, erm?

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Jim on
Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:

> > Dragon 'Professional'.
> >
> > Want.
> >
> > Really badly want.
>
> Any particular reason?

They're -incredibly- rare. The machines pictures all had serial numbers
below 10. It's not known how many were made, but it's a very low number.

Jim
--
"Microsoft admitted its Vista operating system was a 'less good
product' in what IT experts have described as the most ambitious
understatement since the captain of the Titanic reported some
slightly damp tablecloths." http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
From: Jim on
Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> They're -incredibly- rare. The machines pictures all had serial numbers
----------------------------------------------^ 'pictured'

Post before coffee error.

Jim
--
"Microsoft admitted its Vista operating system was a 'less good
product' in what IT experts have described as the most ambitious
understatement since the captain of the Titanic reported some
slightly damp tablecloths." http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
From: T i m on
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:17:06 +0100, Bruce Horrocks
<07.013(a)scorecrow.com> wrote:

>On 20/06/2010 10:52, T i m wrote:
>> I didn't spot any of the Apple II clones on Jim or PD's shots. If
>> there weren't any I might drop Bletchley a line and see if they want
>> one.
>
>I didn't see any on display so probably is worth calling them.


OK I will do then (I'll include some pics as well).

Cheers, T i m
From: Woody on
Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:
>
>>> Dragon 'Professional'.
>>>
>>> Want.
>>>
>>> Really badly want.
>>
>> Any particular reason?
>
> They're -incredibly- rare. The machines pictures all had serial
> numbers
> below 10. It's not known how many were made, but it's a very low
> number.

That is understandable. The dragon was bad enough, why would you want to
expand on that?


--
Woody
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Prev: Security query
Next: Apple "Snow White Design Language"