Bug on the Mac or on web server?
in [Mac Systems]
|
Prev: Ghost in the Mac
Next: Spotlight Question
From: dorayme on 21 Jun 2010 23:44 In article <michelle-BF93B0.06443021062010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>, Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > In article <tom_stiller-8FA65E.07181821062010(a)news.individual.net>, > Tom Stiller <tom_stiller(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > And that we don't have free wills? > > I had to pay for my will. You probably wasted your dough. You just need a something to write on that wont rot. -- dorayme
From: Mike Rosenberg on 22 Jun 2010 08:25 dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > I had to pay for my will. > > You probably wasted your dough. Eh, she won't be around to spend it when it counts. -- Favorite yoga position: Rosh hashavasana, the high holy pose Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi>
From: dorayme on 22 Jun 2010 22:27 In article <1jkhbdy.ad2z9huvg280N%mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com>, mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) wrote: > dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > > I had to pay for my will. > > > > You probably wasted your dough. > > Eh, she won't be around to spend it when it counts. This suggests she is on the miserly side, which makes my comment even more pertinent. I wrote mine out on the back of an envelope, literally! My lawyer has it and says it is perfectly good. Yes, I got witnesses to sign it at the time. I have heard that some mean folk write cheques ("check" to you Mr. Yank) on fridges ("refrigerators") so that the receiver has the utmost trouble cashing it. Apparently it is perfectly legal. <g> -- dorayme
From: dorayme on 22 Jun 2010 23:27 In article <michelle-C9366E.19480622062010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>, Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > In article <dorayme-7556B4.12275723062010(a)news.albasani.net>, > dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > I had to pay for my will. > > > > > > > > You probably wasted your dough. > > > > > > Eh, she won't be around to spend it when it counts. > > > > This suggests she is on the miserly side, > > If it really does suggest it, it's totally incorrect. > > > which makes my comment even more pertinent. > > The pertinency hasn't changed; it's still zero. To say that someone does not have to pay to make a will is pertinent to someone who declares she has paid for it. It may be wrong, it may even be impertinent. But it is still pertinent. -- dorayme
From: dorayme on 23 Jun 2010 00:26
In article <michelle-AE3699.20475422062010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>, Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > In article <dorayme-EC0A6B.13272223062010(a)news.albasani.net>, > dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > To say that someone does not have to pay to make a will is pertinent to > > someone who declares she has paid for it. It may be wrong, it may even > > be impertinent. But it is still pertinent. > > To say that it is a waste of money is not pertinent. You have no idea what > my estate will be nor how I want it distributed so your comment that I > wasted my money is not only not pertinent, but it is also asinine. To say that it is a waste of money may be asinine, but it is still pertinent. Just as it was pertinent to reply to you that your argument against John Wolf earlier: "If God can foresee from the beginning of time who will repent and who will not, then what's the point in trying to get anyone to repent? It will happen or not, just as God has foreseen, without your intervention." was - essentially - a bad one ("He might have foreseen that by John's efforts, some people repent."). Your reply to this was definitely asinine when you had an opportunity here to discuss something mildly interesting. (This usenet group is your chat room isn't it?) -- dorayme |