Bug on the Mac or on web server?
in [Mac Systems]
|
Prev: Ghost in the Mac
Next: Spotlight Question
From: Mike Rosenberg on 23 Jun 2010 21:21 dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > You were the one who said there is a time to spend money when it > > > counts. > > > > I did? In which post? > > > > It is a watertight deduction from: "she won't be around to spend > it when it counts.", Mr Suddenly All Literal. She won't be around to spend her money when the WILL counts. -- Favorite yoga position: Rosh hashavasana, the high holy pose Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi>
From: dorayme on 23 Jun 2010 22:02 In article <1jkk5zo.1fzhoa213iub40N%mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com>, mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) wrote: > dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > > > You were the one who said there is a time to spend money when it > > > > counts. > > > > > > I did? In which post? > > > > > > > It is a watertight deduction from: "she won't be around to spend > > it when it counts.", Mr Suddenly All Literal. > > She won't be around to spend her money when the WILL counts. Right, the will counts in a certain way after she dies. But hang on, it counts in another way before she dies. It probably bloody well counts in yet a third way at the very time she is dying. Shall we go on counting the way things count? When the will counts, she won't be around to spend it, you say. But this is *necessarily* false in the context because that is what a will is, a means to spend one's money when dead. Mike, you are making no sense here and no headway. What is going on? Why are you so interested in poor old Michelle's death, you morbid thing you? I hope no one thinks *I* am excessively animated by the prospect of poor Michelle's demise. While we have never got on much, I don't hate her that much! Reminds me of this tale: <http://dorayme.netweaver.com.au/jokes/bankManager.html> -- dorayme
From: dorayme on 23 Jun 2010 22:18 In article <michelle-F2D77C.18521723062010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>, Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > In article <dorayme-63BB64.08351324062010(a)news.albasani.net>, > dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > > I spent money for my will. You wrote yours on the back of an > > > envelope. Looks like you're the miserly one; too cheap to even use a > > > sheet of stationery. > > > > There is some truth in this but it is misleading. It was done in > > humbleness to eschew all pride in self. > > If you were really humble and eschewing all pride in self, you wouldn't be > bragging about it. > There are some things one must impress on others for their sake rather than one's. There is a difference between bragging (you must know by now that is the last thing I would do) and communicating. I tell you about my incredible qualities for the sole purpose of letting you model some of them. It is an evangelical thing I do in lieu of religion. > > > > Michelle chases every possible trivial thought and idea, > > > > > > Wrong again. > > > > I rest my case on this. > > Good idea; withdrawing when losing is always a good strategy. > It is not withdrawal, but then subtlety has never been your big thing. The idea here is that your pursuit of my statement (and all of mine are trivial and silly, anyone can see that) proves you chase such things. .... > > Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their > > shoes. > > Take your own advice; you need it more than I do. Why? I don't need shoes, I have plenty already. -- dorayme
From: dorayme on 24 Jun 2010 01:26 In article <michelle-AEBBE5.20034823062010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>, Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > In article <dorayme-C63A83.12181124062010(a)news.albasani.net>, > dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > There are some things one must impress on others for their sake rather > > than one's. There is a difference between bragging (you must know by now > > that is the last thing I would do) and communicating. I tell you about > > my incredible qualities for the sole purpose of letting you model some > > of them. It is an evangelical thing I do in lieu of religion. > > Actually, people would be much better off by eschewing what you do than > emulating them. I must let you have the last word on this. -- dorayme
From: Dan on 29 Jun 2010 15:38
On Jun 20, 8:55 pm, mikeP...(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) wrote: > As long as he's not having a period. He's a little young for it, but he > should have his colon checked out, though. There definitely seems to be > something stuffed up there. Or is that one of the signs of the > apostrophe? It's his asterisk... |