From: Petert on
On Sun, 16 May 2010 12:33:20 +0100, alexd <troffasky(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:

>On 16/05/10 11:23, Petert wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 May 2010 09:17:31 +0100, "Harry Stottle"
>
>>> The real reason is probably those that search the internet for items are
>>> usually looking for the cheapest price, whilst those that wander into the
>>> store are more likely to be influenced by sales patter, so they can get away
>>> with charging more in store.
>>
>> I think you've failed to spot that the OP is referring to CPW shop&
>> CPW On-line
>
>Not sure why you get that impression.

Because of the way the op phrased his question:

quote
but the price in store is �199 + top up but on
the website the price is �149 + top up!!
end quote

"The price in the store (CPW) is �199" & "on the website the price is
�149."

It was the "on the website" that indicated to me he meant the CPW
website, not anybody else's website.

I could of course be wrong, but the OP doesn't seem to have replied to
the thread to help out.
--
Cheers

Peter
From: alexd on
On 16/05/10 18:54, Petert wrote:

> Because of the way the op phrased his question:
>
> quote
> but the price in store is �199 + top up but on
> the website the price is �149 + top up!!
> end quote
>
> "The price in the store (CPW) is �199"& "on the website the price is
> �149."
>
> It was the "on the website" that indicated to me he meant the CPW
> website, not anybody else's website.

What Harry said is not incompatible with what the OP said. I think we'll
just have to agree to disagree here.

--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm(a)ale.cx)
22:54:21 up 18 days, 22:37, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.16, 0.13
It is better to have been wasted and then sober
than to never have been wasted at all
From: Petert on
On Sun, 16 May 2010 23:00:38 +0100, alexd <troffasky(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:

>On 16/05/10 18:54, Petert wrote:
>
>> Because of the way the op phrased his question:
>>
>> quote
>> but the price in store is �199 + top up but on
>> the website the price is �149 + top up!!
>> end quote
>>
>> "The price in the store (CPW) is �199"& "on the website the price is
>> �149."
>>
>> It was the "on the website" that indicated to me he meant the CPW
>> website, not anybody else's website.
>
>What Harry said is not incompatible with what the OP said. I think we'll
>just have to agree to disagree here.


I agree - it's too trivial to argue about
--
Cheers

Peter

(Reply to address is a spam trap - pse reply to the group)