From: Petert on 16 May 2010 13:54 On Sun, 16 May 2010 12:33:20 +0100, alexd <troffasky(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On 16/05/10 11:23, Petert wrote: >> On Fri, 14 May 2010 09:17:31 +0100, "Harry Stottle" > >>> The real reason is probably those that search the internet for items are >>> usually looking for the cheapest price, whilst those that wander into the >>> store are more likely to be influenced by sales patter, so they can get away >>> with charging more in store. >> >> I think you've failed to spot that the OP is referring to CPW shop& >> CPW On-line > >Not sure why you get that impression. Because of the way the op phrased his question: quote but the price in store is �199 + top up but on the website the price is �149 + top up!! end quote "The price in the store (CPW) is �199" & "on the website the price is �149." It was the "on the website" that indicated to me he meant the CPW website, not anybody else's website. I could of course be wrong, but the OP doesn't seem to have replied to the thread to help out. -- Cheers Peter
From: alexd on 16 May 2010 18:00 On 16/05/10 18:54, Petert wrote: > Because of the way the op phrased his question: > > quote > but the price in store is �199 + top up but on > the website the price is �149 + top up!! > end quote > > "The price in the store (CPW) is �199"& "on the website the price is > �149." > > It was the "on the website" that indicated to me he meant the CPW > website, not anybody else's website. What Harry said is not incompatible with what the OP said. I think we'll just have to agree to disagree here. -- <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm(a)ale.cx) 22:54:21 up 18 days, 22:37, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.16, 0.13 It is better to have been wasted and then sober than to never have been wasted at all
From: Petert on 17 May 2010 14:19 On Sun, 16 May 2010 23:00:38 +0100, alexd <troffasky(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On 16/05/10 18:54, Petert wrote: > >> Because of the way the op phrased his question: >> >> quote >> but the price in store is �199 + top up but on >> the website the price is �149 + top up!! >> end quote >> >> "The price in the store (CPW) is �199"& "on the website the price is >> �149." >> >> It was the "on the website" that indicated to me he meant the CPW >> website, not anybody else's website. > >What Harry said is not incompatible with what the OP said. I think we'll >just have to agree to disagree here. I agree - it's too trivial to argue about -- Cheers Peter (Reply to address is a spam trap - pse reply to the group)
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Mobile phone repairs? Next: Do EU data bundles apply to *PAYG* SIM cards? |