CAUTIONARY NOTE ON THE AFTERLIFE
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Speed of Time
Next: "The Einstein Hoax"
From: BruceS on 8 Jan 2010 16:59 On Jan 8, 7:15 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On Jan 5, 12:00 pm, BruceS <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Just because you don't fully understand something someone else says, > > don't assume that they're more intelligent than you are. It's > > possible that they're talking more in their own specialty. It's also > > possible that they're quite insane, and that you aren't understanding > > them because they make no sense. Guess which Hammond is. > > Of course, some people fit both categories, but I won't name any names > > on that. > > someone != they > 1 != 2 > > a someone -> one > the someone -> who :s/they're/he's :s/them/him :s/they/he That should fix it. Sloppy typing is just lazy, but bad grammar is reprehensible. The penitent apologizes for his lapse and strives to improve.
From: Occidental on 14 Jan 2010 13:21 On Jan 14, 5:52 am, "Geopelia" <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > > Perhaps God is really a Goddess? > > Like the Venus of Willendorf. > "Occidental" <Occiden...(a)comcast.net> wrote > ..with a better waistline, one hopes. > > She's a Mother Goddess, not a fashion model. How many women, in the > Palaeolithic, could have become so fat? Being fat makes you a Goddess? Here is a side-by-side Goddess comparison: http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/492/godesses.jpg No competition.
From: Geopelia on 14 Jan 2010 14:40 "Occidental" <Occidental(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:0fbf3c84-76ca-40cf-93eb-a4451e24c874(a)g14g2000vbd.googlegroups.com... > On Jan 14, 5:52 am, "Geopelia" <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: >> > Perhaps God is really a Goddess? >> > Like the Venus of Willendorf. > >> "Occidental" <Occiden...(a)comcast.net> wrote >> ..with a better waistline, one hopes. >> >> She's a Mother Goddess, not a fashion model. How many women, in the >> Palaeolithic, could have become so fat? > > Being fat makes you a Goddess? > > Here is a side-by-side Goddess comparison: > > http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/492/godesses.jpg > > No competition. > That's Greta Garbo, isn't it? But these days even Marilyn Monroe would be considered too plump.
From: Occidental on 14 Jan 2010 19:45 On Jan 14, 2:40 pm, "Geopelia" <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > "Occidental" <Occiden...(a)comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:0fbf3c84-76ca-40cf-93eb-a4451e24c874(a)g14g2000vbd.googlegroups.com... > > > On Jan 14, 5:52 am, "Geopelia" <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > >> > Perhaps God is really a Goddess? > >> > Like the Venus of Willendorf. > > >> "Occidental" <Occiden...(a)comcast.net> wrote > >> ..with a better waistline, one hopes. > > >> She's a Mother Goddess, not a fashion model. How many women, in the > >> Palaeolithic, could have become so fat? > > > Being fat makes you a Goddess? > > > Here is a side-by-side Goddess comparison: > > >http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/492/godesses.jpg > > > No competition. > > That's Greta Garbo, isn't it? Yes, in Queen Christina (1933). > But these days even Marilyn Monroe would be considered too plump. Too plump for what?
From: Geopelia on 15 Jan 2010 05:30
"Occidental" <Occidental(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:43ef94b1-1fe1-4975-920f-6e33576d8a31(a)15g2000vbg.googlegroups.com... On Jan 14, 2:40 pm, "Geopelia" <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > "Occidental" <Occiden...(a)comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:0fbf3c84-76ca-40cf-93eb-a4451e24c874(a)g14g2000vbd.googlegroups.com... > > > On Jan 14, 5:52 am, "Geopelia" <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > >> > Perhaps God is really a Goddess? > >> > Like the Venus of Willendorf. > > >> "Occidental" <Occiden...(a)comcast.net> wrote > >> ..with a better waistline, one hopes. > > >> She's a Mother Goddess, not a fashion model. How many women, in the > >> Palaeolithic, could have become so fat? > > > Being fat makes you a Goddess? > > > Here is a side-by-side Goddess comparison: > > >http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/492/godesses.jpg > > > No competition. > > That's Greta Garbo, isn't it? Yes, in Queen Christina (1933). > But these days even Marilyn Monroe would be considered too plump. Too plump for what? For today's idea of beauty. She was 37 - 23 - 36 inches, as the Studio claimed. And no silicone! Today girls want to be size 8, or 10 at most. |