CAUTIONARY NOTE ON THE AFTERLIFE
in [Physics]
|
Prev: geothermal energy
Next: First time: Haversian canal/blood vessels of meteorite magnified to 4000X
From: Autymn D. C. on 25 Dec 2009 08:27 On Dec 25, 4:38 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:25:01 -0800 (PST), Harbinger > <jhnguiney...(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > >[Geopelia] > >The main difficulty with the thesis is lack of evidence. > > [Hammond] > I'll be the judge of that thank you. In the first place > you're not a qualified physicist. In the second place your > knowledge of psychology and theology is pretty slim. I > happened to be a qualified professional expert in all three > fields. Harbinger, dumbshit. > >[Geopelia] > > OBE's happen, > >though, so I keep an open mind. My late friend, John Turner, a genuis > >if ever there were one, engaged in research into LCD systems, had an > >OBE whilst walking two Amsterdam Phillips collegues to the canteen for > >lunch, across a bleak quad in an ugly part of London - Croydon. Ugh! > >For maybe five or six seconds, he found himself looking down upon all > >three, yet was conscious of engaging in conversation with the other > >two in a chatty manner. He said, ''The experience changed my life, > >John!' Harbinger, dumbshit. Geopelia, thank parietal lobe. > [Hammond] > Well that's nothing but anecdotal evidence. > Hallucinogenic drugs will do exactly the same thing. > No I think what we need is a qualified physicist who has > spent 20 years studying psychology and theology to take a > serious look into the problem and the first thing he should > do is investigate whether or not the newly discovered already told you, dolt: whether or not = whether or not whether, ocsýmòrònic
From: Geopelia on 25 Dec 2009 16:32 "George Hammond" <Nowhere1(a)notspam.com> wrote in message news:8ub9j5lemmlrdj4hu7lfvmtcu4q5gl3s5n(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:25:01 -0800 (PST), Harbinger > <jhnguiney058(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > >>On 24 Dec, 23:09, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:59:19 -0800 (PST), >>> >>> "bigflet...(a)gmail.com" <bigflet...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >On Dec 24, 11:28 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: >>> >> CAUTIONARY NOTE ON THE AFTERLIFE >>> >>> >> Copyright: George Hammond 2009 >>> >>> >Copy wrong. >>> >>> >Afterlife is the ultimate oxymoron. >>> >>> [Hammond] >>> That's what you think. A PhD in Physics is more likely an >>> oxymoron. >>> >>> >BOfL >>> > >>> ======================================= >> >> >>[Geopelia] >>The main difficulty with the thesis is lack of evidence. It wasn't me who said that. Geopelia. >> >> > [Hammond] > I'll be the judge of that thank you. In the first place > you're not a qualified physicist. In the second place your > knowledge of psychology and theology is pretty slim. I > happened to be a qualified professional expert in all three > fields. Are you talking to me? Of course I don't know much. I just ask the ignorant questions. But I think you are replying to somebody else. Computers! Geopelia >> >>[Geopelia] >> OBE's happen, >>though, so I keep an open mind. My late friend, John Turner, a genuis >>if ever there were one, engaged in research into LCD systems, had an >>OBE whilst walking two Amsterdam Phillips collegues to the canteen for >>lunch, across a bleak quad in an ugly part of London - Croydon. Ugh! >>For maybe five or six seconds, he found himself looking down upon all >>three, yet was conscious of engaging in conversation with the other >>two in a chatty manner. He said, ''The experience changed my life, >>John!' This isn't me either! Geopelia >> >> > [Hammond] > Well that's nothing but anecdotal evidence. > Hallucinogenic drugs will do exactly the same thing. > No I think what we need is a qualified physicist who has > spent 20 years studying psychology and theology to take a > serious look into the problem and the first thing he should > do is investigate whether or not the newly discovered > microtubule-computer in the brain is capable of > cyber-resurrecting a person into virtual reality at death. > And that is just exactly what I am doing. so far the > world's leading expert in microtubule structure in the > cytoskeleton, Prof. Stuart Hameroff has told me personally > in an e-mail message that he judges the hypothesis to be > "possible" and then I would think is enough to indicate that > the theory is a competent and credible hypothesis. > ======================================== > GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE > Primary site > http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond > Mirror site > http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com > HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto > http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 > =======================================
From: Geopelia on 25 Dec 2009 16:35 "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:febcb78c-0dc2-4991-966e-480062a89d65(a)13g2000prl.googlegroups.com... On Dec 25, 4:38 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:25:01 -0800 (PST), Harbinger > <jhnguiney...(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > >[Geopelia] > >The main difficulty with the thesis is lack of evidence. Not me. Geopelia > > [Hammond] > I'll be the judge of that thank you. In the first place > you're not a qualified physicist. In the second place your > knowledge of psychology and theology is pretty slim. I > happened to be a qualified professional expert in all three > fields. Harbinger, dumbshit. > >[Geopelia] Not my post! Geopelia > > OBE's happen, > >though, so I keep an open mind. My late friend, John Turner, a genuis > >if ever there were one, engaged in research into LCD systems, had an > >OBE whilst walking two Amsterdam Phillips collegues to the canteen for > >lunch, across a bleak quad in an ugly part of London - Croydon. Ugh! > >For maybe five or six seconds, he found himself looking down upon all > >three, yet was conscious of engaging in conversation with the other > >two in a chatty manner. He said, ''The experience changed my life, > >John!' Harbinger, dumbshit. Geopelia, thank parietal lobe. > [Hammond] > Well that's nothing but anecdotal evidence. > Hallucinogenic drugs will do exactly the same thing. > No I think what we need is a qualified physicist who has > spent 20 years studying psychology and theology to take a > serious look into the problem and the first thing he should > do is investigate whether or not the newly discovered already told you, dolt: whether or not = whether or not whether, ocs�m�r�nic What's going on? I didn't say a lot of this. Geopelia
From: Tiger Would on 25 Dec 2009 16:41 On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:38:12 -0800, George Hammond wrote: > [Hammond] > Well that's nothing but anecdotal evidence. > Hallucinogenic drugs will do exactly the same thing. I've taken LSD hundreds of times and walked in an alternate reality yet always returned to my normal boring self. I've been trying to tie God and Science together all my life. -- tiger
From: Androcles on 25 Dec 2009 18:40
"nuny(a)bid.nes" <alien8752(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:a94f38a6-a9a6-4a5c-aa9f-54dc9d8e8b2d(a)r24g2000prf.googlegroups.com... On Dec 25, 1:41 pm, Tiger Would <theoreticalfo...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:38:12 -0800, George Hammond wrote: > > [Hammond] > > Well that's nothing but anecdotal evidence. > > Hallucinogenic drugs will do exactly the same thing. > > I've taken LSD hundreds of times and walked in an alternate reality yet > always returned to my normal boring self. I've been trying to tie God > and Science together all my life. I've taken LSD hundreds of times ========================================= That explains your lunacy, then. |