CAUTIONARY NOTE ON THE AFTERLIFE
in [Physics]
|
Prev: geothermal energy
Next: First time: Haversian canal/blood vessels of meteorite magnified to 4000X
From: George Hammond on 26 Dec 2009 00:13 On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:32:37 +1300, "Geopelia" <phildoran(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: >>> >>> >> [Hammond] >> I'll be the judge of that thank you. In the first place >> you're not a qualified physicist. In the second place your >> knowledge of psychology and theology is pretty slim. I >> happened to be a qualified professional expert in all three >> fields. > >Are you talking to me? Of course I don't know much. I just ask the ignorant >questions. >But I think you are replying to somebody else. >Computers! > Geopelia > > [Hammond] I'm dictating this at 120 words a minute without lifting a finger using Dragon-10. Otherwise I wouldn't even bother to respond to it if I had to pound a stone age computer with my fingers. As I've suggested before people should at least type their initials or a least one initial at the beginning of their posts such as G: For Geopelia or H: for harbinger etc. All professional level e-mail discussion lists use brackets such as [Hammond] which is where I picked up the habit. Not being able to tell who said what in a conversation is a pain in the neck and so is trying to figure out >, >>, >>>, >>>>, >>>>> etc. ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: George Hammond on 26 Dec 2009 00:16 On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:41:50 -0500, Tiger Would <theoreticalfolly(a)aol.com> wrote: >On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:38:12 -0800, George Hammond wrote: > >> [Hammond] >> Well that's nothing but anecdotal evidence. >> Hallucinogenic drugs will do exactly the same thing. > >I've taken LSD hundreds of times and walked in an alternate reality yet >always returned to my normal boring self. I've been trying to tie God >and Science together all my life. > [Hammond] Only difference between you and me is I succeeded and you failed. if you have any logical, analytical or scientific ability how about posting something on topic? I'm using voice recognition and I don't have to lift a finger to talk to you. ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: George Hammond on 26 Dec 2009 00:57 On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:49:45 -0800 (PST), "bigfletch8(a)gmail.com" <bigfletch8(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >To GH...you are representative of many who have come befor you, by >trying to diuscect tissue to find life. I think the whole of Zen was >written for people like you....Im not knocking you btw. I have no >doubt in your sincerity. > >BOfL > > [Hammond] Well Boffle, I wish we could spend more time talking about competence rather than sincerity. Sincerity is cheap, competences expensive. If I remember correctly you are either a PhD student in theoretical physics or post doc or something. Correct me if I am wrong. Assuming you are a physics postdoc that probably means that you don't know a heck of a lot about biology. As an MS in physics the same goes for me. But as any physicist knows biology is mainly postage stamp collecting compared to mathematical physics. Having said that, have you ever had occasion to actually go and look at how muscles contract? Do you realize there are little things called "motor molecules" that actually have two legs and literally "walk along" these microtubules were talking about. And in the case of muscles they work in unison like galley slaves rowing one microtubule pasts another causing the entire muscle cell to contract. For Christ sakes Boffle, who would have imagined that such a thing was possible. These molecules by the way have a molecular weight in the hundreds of thousands of Daltons! They are apparently proteins that can "walk" on two legs by changing their conformation! And another thing Boffle, as you know there has been an explosion in scientific manpower in the past 40 years, we must have 10 times the number of scientists now that we had 40 years ago. This means that when something new is detected there is an army of scientific manpower ready to leap on it with both feet. The latest thing is, that they have discovered that these microtubules are hollow and the dimers in the walls switch between two different confirmations at microwave frequencies (Frohlich's frequency). They now believe that this causes something called "superradiance" in the interior of the microtubule and optical signals can be transmitted without any loss over large distances. By the way you'll never guess who was the first one to discover and publish a theory of "superradiace" in water: physicist Robert H. Dicke himself then at Princeton in 1954! Anyway, Stuart Hameroff met with Sir Roger Penrose in 1994 and Penrose became convinced along with Hameroff that these microtubules are switching dimer computers optically interconnected by massless bosons (e.g. optical photons). Meanwhile another physics genius, Prof. Frank Tipler at Tulane Published a celebrated book in1994 in which he pointed out that a large enough computer could actually resurrect a person to eternal life in virtual reality (cyberspace) inside the computer. Of course he pointed out that it would take an astronomically large computer to do so. But meanwhile, Penrose and Hameroff have already discovered that there is a gigantic microtubule computer already in the brain and that it has the advantage of having the whole cytoskeleton of the actual real human body built right into it, so that the size of the necessary computer is reduced by a double exponential sized factor! What I'm telling you as one physicist to another is that the scientific possibility of an actual literal life after death in "virtual reality" inside the microtubule computer is a DISTINCT scientific possibility! How about a competent comment about that rather than merely a sincere comment? ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: eric gisse on 26 Dec 2009 01:24 George Hammond wrote: [...] > What I now realize is that some of these drugs in very > minute quantities can affect the polymerization and > depolymerization of the microtubules in the neurons of the > brain. Tthank Christ they apparently sort of act like > anesthetics and the action is totally reversible. But I'll > bet there are drugs out there that aren't reversible. Now, > 40 years later, I realized how dangerous all that bullshit > was and how lucky we were to have survived it. I'm sure your the multiple times you have been institutionalized over the years is unrelated to your drug use! [...]
From: George Hammond on 26 Dec 2009 01:45
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 21:46:47 -0800 (PST), Don Stockbauer <don.stockbauer(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >God and the Universe are identical concepts. > > [Hammond] No they are not because God is a three letter word and Universe is an 8 letter word so obviously they are not identical. ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ======================================= |