From: Robert Coe on 22 Jun 2010 22:19 On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:26:57 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: : On Jun 21, 10:39�pm, Robert Coe <b...(a)1776.COM> wrote: : > On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:18:16 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote: : > : > : CCD seems to be able to avoid motion problems that CMOS suffers from. : > : How about Canon's 5DII, does it have these issues with video? : > : > Right, Rich. And I once read a very compelling argument that for various : > aerodynamic reasons a bumblebee can't fly. : > : > Bob : : I remember a plane in WW2 that had roughly the same shape as a : bumblebee and it flew. If the bumblebee had a 16-cylinder gasoline-powered engine, nobody would have doubted he could fly. Bob
From: /dev/null/ on 22 Jun 2010 22:42 "Robert Coe" <bob(a)1776.COM> wrote in message news:bkr226dorhsmur8pkp1ev5p8p7n4odc5rs(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:26:57 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > : On Jun 21, 10:39 pm, Robert Coe <b...(a)1776.COM> wrote: > : > On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:18:16 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > : > > : > : CCD seems to be able to avoid motion problems that CMOS suffers > from. > : > : How about Canon's 5DII, does it have these issues with video? > : > > : > Right, Rich. And I once read a very compelling argument that for > various > : > aerodynamic reasons a bumblebee can't fly. > : > > : > Bob > : > : I remember a plane in WW2 that had roughly the same shape as a > : bumblebee and it flew. > > If the bumblebee had a 16-cylinder gasoline-powered engine, nobody would > have > doubted he could fly. > > Bob The GeeBee was quite a handful to fly. It took all the skills the pilot had, plus some rather large gonads!
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: How to tell a rank amateur from a seasoned one, or a pro Next: Sunset flyby |