From: RichA on
CCD seems to be able to avoid motion problems that CMOS suffers from.
How about Canon's 5DII, does it have these issues with video?

From: Bruce on
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:18:16 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>CCD seems to be able to avoid motion problems that CMOS suffers from.


Based on what information, exactly?


>How about Canon's 5DII, does it have these issues with video?


What issues?

From: nospam on
In article
<c26d63aa-d4b9-4369-874b-c52a44825a8f(a)u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> CCD seems to be able to avoid motion problems that CMOS suffers from.
> How about Canon's 5DII, does it have these issues with video?

the 'motion problems' are due to rolling shutters.
From: RichA on
On Jun 21, 5:24 pm, nospam <nos...(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:
> In article
> <c26d63aa-d4b9-4369-874b-c52a44825...(a)u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
>
> RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > CCD seems to be able to avoid motion problems that CMOS suffers from.
> > How about Canon's 5DII, does it have these issues with video?
>
> the 'motion problems' are due to rolling shutters.

Ok, so the problem is not due to CCDs, just happens most P&S's still
use them and DSLR's use CMOS and rolling shutters. I wonder what
Panasonic's new 4/3rds video camera is going to use? $3000.00.
From: Robert Coe on
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:18:16 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:
: CCD seems to be able to avoid motion problems that CMOS suffers from.
: How about Canon's 5DII, does it have these issues with video?

Right, Rich. And I once read a very compelling argument that for various
aerodynamic reasons a bumblebee can't fly.

Bob