From: RichA on 21 Jun 2010 17:18 CCD seems to be able to avoid motion problems that CMOS suffers from. How about Canon's 5DII, does it have these issues with video?
From: Bruce on 21 Jun 2010 17:23 On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:18:16 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >CCD seems to be able to avoid motion problems that CMOS suffers from. Based on what information, exactly? >How about Canon's 5DII, does it have these issues with video? What issues?
From: nospam on 21 Jun 2010 17:24 In article <c26d63aa-d4b9-4369-874b-c52a44825a8f(a)u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: > CCD seems to be able to avoid motion problems that CMOS suffers from. > How about Canon's 5DII, does it have these issues with video? the 'motion problems' are due to rolling shutters.
From: RichA on 21 Jun 2010 17:32 On Jun 21, 5:24 pm, nospam <nos...(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article > <c26d63aa-d4b9-4369-874b-c52a44825...(a)u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, > > RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > CCD seems to be able to avoid motion problems that CMOS suffers from. > > How about Canon's 5DII, does it have these issues with video? > > the 'motion problems' are due to rolling shutters. Ok, so the problem is not due to CCDs, just happens most P&S's still use them and DSLR's use CMOS and rolling shutters. I wonder what Panasonic's new 4/3rds video camera is going to use? $3000.00.
From: Robert Coe on 21 Jun 2010 22:39 On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:18:16 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: : CCD seems to be able to avoid motion problems that CMOS suffers from. : How about Canon's 5DII, does it have these issues with video? Right, Rich. And I once read a very compelling argument that for various aerodynamic reasons a bumblebee can't fly. Bob
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: How to tell a rank amateur from a seasoned one, or a pro Next: Sunset flyby |